Re: FreeBSD10: lock order reversal with portsnap extract

2013-06-01 Thread Walter Hurry
to a VM. >> >> One of the first things I do is a 'portsnap fetch extract'. As soon as >> the extract starts it produces a 'lock order reversal' message with a >> KDB stack backtrace, but then proceeds successfully to verify the >> integ

Re: FreeBSD10: lock order reversal with portsnap extract

2013-06-01 Thread Julian H. Stacey
on as > the extract starts it produces a 'lock order reversal' message with a KDB > stack backtrace, but then proceeds successfully to verify the integrity > and install the ports tree. > > Should I worry? Yes, you should worry ;-) Worry you didn't realise:

Re: FreeBSD10: lock order reversal with portsnap extract

2013-06-01 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
El 01/06/2013 15:44, "Walter Hurry" escribió: > > I'm installing FreeBSD10 (head; snapshot from 30 May 2013) into a VM. > > One of the first things I do is a 'portsnap fetch extract'. As soon as > the extract starts it produces a 'lock order revers

FreeBSD10: lock order reversal with portsnap extract

2013-06-01 Thread Walter Hurry
I'm installing FreeBSD10 (head; snapshot from 30 May 2013) into a VM. One of the first things I do is a 'portsnap fetch extract'. As soon as the extract starts it produces a 'lock order reversal' message with a KDB stack backtrace, but then proceeds successfully to

Re: lock order reversal @ FreeBSD 9.0B3

2011-10-14 Thread Lowell Gilbert
That looks like LOR #261, known not be a problem. [ http://ipv4.sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-q

lock order reversal @ FreeBSD 9.0B3

2011-10-14 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, I'm seeing weird messages at dmesg saying someting about "lock order reversal" (see below) on my FreeBSD 9.0 beta 3. I think this has something to do with the filesystem, so I'm a little bit worried. Does anybody know if this is a known bug? (If so, how do you know

Re: 7-STABLE lock order reversal

2008-08-20 Thread Al Plant
Per olof Ljungmark wrote: Al Plant wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Per olof Ljungmark wrote: 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 19 20:39:48 CEST 2008 After system update from June 12 sources to Aug 12 I have seen frequent lockups during network operations. Compiled debugging kernel and got the below during

Re: 7-STABLE lock order reversal

2008-08-20 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Al Plant wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Per olof Ljungmark wrote: 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 19 20:39:48 CEST 2008 After system update from June 12 sources to Aug 12 I have seen frequent lockups during network operations. Compiled debugging kernel and got the below during boot. Should I open a PR? S

Re: 7-STABLE lock order reversal

2008-08-20 Thread Al Plant
Al Plant wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Per olof Ljungmark wrote: 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 19 20:39:48 CEST 2008 After system update from June 12 sources to Aug 12 I have seen frequent lockups during network operations. Compiled debugging kernel and got the below during boot. Should I open a PR? S

Re: 7-STABLE lock order reversal

2008-08-20 Thread Al Plant
Kris Kennaway wrote: Per olof Ljungmark wrote: 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 19 20:39:48 CEST 2008 After system update from June 12 sources to Aug 12 I have seen frequent lockups during network operations. Compiled debugging kernel and got the below during boot. Should I open a PR? Suggestions welcom

Re: 7-STABLE lock order reversal

2008-08-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
Per olof Ljungmark wrote: 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 19 20:39:48 CEST 2008 After system update from June 12 sources to Aug 12 I have seen frequent lockups during network operations. Compiled debugging kernel and got the below during boot. Should I open a PR? Suggestions welcome. Thanks. Yes or tr

7-STABLE lock order reversal

2008-08-19 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
: uhid0: on uhub5 Aug 19 22:12:47 kreutzman kernel: lock order reversal: Aug 19 22:12:47 kreutzman kernel: 1st 0xc7077a14 rtentry (rtentry) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:328 Aug 19 22:12:47 kreutzman kernel: 2nd 0xc6eee07c radix node head (radix node head) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:879 Aug 19 22:12:47

Re: Lock order reversal submissions?

2008-05-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 05:26:29AM -0700, Tobias Hoellrich wrote: > Does anybody happen to know where I can submit lock order reversal > outputs (like the one below)? I don't want to spam freebsd-current and > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html seems to have not been >

Lock order reversal submissions?

2008-05-23 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
Does anybody happen to know where I can submit lock order reversal outputs (like the one below)? I don't want to spam freebsd-current and http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html seems to have not been updated in over a year now. Thanks - Tobias This is from 8.0-CURRENT: May 22 10:

Re: Stopevent / Lock order reversal / etc

2004-04-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:55:10PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > That you're seeing evidence of kernel bugs. Report to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], although they might already be fixed in > 5.2-CURRENT. I forgot to mention that before reporting them to current@ you should search the mailing list archive

Re: Stopevent / Lock order reversal / etc

2004-04-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
eld: > Apr 8 08:53:54 vjofn2 kernel: exclusive sleep mutex sigacts r = 0 (0xc8c90aa8) > locked @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_condvar.c:457 > Apr 8 08:53:54 vjofn2 kernel: lock order reversal > Apr 8 08:53:54 vjofn2 kernel: 1st 0xc8c90aa8 sigacts (sigacts) @ /usr/src/sys/k > ern/kern_condvar.c:

Stopevent / Lock order reversal / etc

2004-04-08 Thread Tuc
@ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_condvar.c:457 Apr 8 08:53:54 vjofn2 kernel: lock order reversal Apr 8 08:53:54 vjofn2 kernel: 1st 0xc8c90aa8 sigacts (sigacts) @ /usr/src/sys/k ern/kern_condvar.c:457 Apr 8 08:53:54 vjofn2 kernel: 2nd 0xc89e306c process lock (process lock) @ /usr /src/sys/kern/kern_synch.

Re: Lock order reversal

2004-01-29 Thread Jan Grant
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Piotr Gnyp wrote: > What is exactly lock order reversal? I`ve encountered something like > this on my console: > lock order reversal > 1st 0xc720dce4 vm object (vm object) @ vm/swap_pager.c:1323 > 2nd 0xc06c01a0 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) @ > vm

Re: Lock order reversal

2004-01-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:23:26PM +0100, Piotr Gnyp wrote: > What is exactly lock order reversal? I`ve encountered something like > this on my console: > lock order reversal > 1st 0xc720dce4 vm object (vm object) @ vm/swap_pager.c:1323 > 2nd 0xc06c01a0 swap_pager swhash (sw

Lock order reversal

2004-01-29 Thread Piotr Gnyp
What is exactly lock order reversal? I`ve encountered something like this on my console: lock order reversal 1st 0xc720dce4 vm object (vm object) @ vm/swap_pager.c:1323 2nd 0xc06c01a0 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) @ vm/swap_pager.c:1838 3rd 0xc0c358c4 vm object (vm object) @ vm

Re: Lock Order Reversal (5.1 CUR kern)

2003-07-31 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My thinking: the threading in the kernel for 5.1 CURRENT hasn't all the > kinks out yet. Does anyone know what is going on? > > Before rushing off to the FreeBSD people with it though, they 1) might > already be aware, and 2) maybe I don't understand the error

Re: Lock Order Reversal (5.1 CUR kern)

2003-07-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 11:30:18PM +0200, Pawel Kraszewski wrote: > Hello! > >I have it too, after compiling kernel with debug info and spinlock > witnessing. It does no harm, I guess... Problems with -current should not be discussed on the questions@ mailing list. Check the current@ archiv

Re: Lock Order Reversal (5.1 CUR kern)

2003-07-12 Thread Pawel Kraszewski
Hello! I have it too, after compiling kernel with debug info and spinlock witnessing. It does no harm, I guess... I get THIS *every* time I exit X-windows: lock order reversal 1st 0xc45f4b90 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:432 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map

Lock Order Reversal (5.1 CUR kern)

2003-07-10 Thread Dave
I get THIS *every* time I exit X-windows: lock order reversal 1st 0xc45f4b90 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:432 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:325 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c057b35f,c082f110,c058cfb6,c058cfb6,c058ce51) at backtrace