On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:53:52PM -0600, Sean O'Neill wrote:
> Yeah I know - this is more appropriate for the ports mailing list ...
> hoping someone here knows before I go off and subscribe to the ports
> mailing list to ask the same question.
>
> Anyone know why ports/devel/libtool14 is actua
Yeah I know - this is more appropriate for the ports mailing list ...
hoping someone here knows before I go off and subscribe to the ports
mailing list to ask the same question.
Anyone know why ports/devel/libtool14 is actually libtool 1.3.4 and NOT
libtool 1.4.# ? 1.3.4 is pretty old. Hell, t
