At 09:08 AM 11/21/2008, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Hello all
We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in
front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB
module?
You may want to use FreeNAS which is made for NAS using FreeBSD.
-Derek
--
T
2008/11/21 Ansar Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think you are. We should care about a KERNEL module being bug free and
> high performance.
Agreed.
We did a migration from a Windows email server a while back (about 40,000
mail boxes). As customers logged into the FreeBSD boxes, a process was
kic
>
> > We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers
> in
> > front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel
> SMB
> > module?
> no idea. it worked many times when i wanted to fetch few files from
> windows. but i don't think anyone really cares very much
We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in
front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB
module?
no idea. it worked many times when i wanted to fetch few files from
windows. but i don't think anyone really cares very much about it being
very
Hello all
We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in
front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB
module?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
