On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Bikrant Neupane wrote:
> > > Well, I have no problem with the MAC filtering rules.
> > > Only problem that I am having is that the pkts hit the matching rule
> > > twice as a result I get only half of the b/w than that specified in ipfw
> > > pipe command.
Yes, the packets wi
On Friday 24 September 2004 15:26, dima wrote:
> В пт, 24.09.2004, в 10:20, Bikrant Neupane пишет:
> > On Thursday 23 September 2004 22:29, Jon Simola wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Bikrant Neupane wrote:
> > > > Here is my rule set:
> > > >
> > > > #skip dependind the pkt layer
> > > > 01000
В пт, 24.09.2004, в 10:20, Bikrant Neupane пишет:
> On Thursday 23 September 2004 22:29, Jon Simola wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Bikrant Neupane wrote:
> > > Here is my rule set:
> > >
> > > #skip dependind the pkt layer
> > > 01000 32214780 skipto 1 ip from any to any layer2 in via xl
On Thursday 23 September 2004 22:29, Jon Simola wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Bikrant Neupane wrote:
> > Here is my rule set:
> >
> > #skip dependind the pkt layer
> > 01000 32214780 skipto 1 ip from any to any layer2 in via xl0
> > 01100 20093204 skipto 2 ip from any to any not
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:10:49AM -0600, Nathan Kinkade wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:36:57PM +0545, Bikrant Neupane wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > Well I am not looking for the count rule.
> >
> > Actually I have some other situation. I am trying to implement b/w shaping
> > using i
Here are my dummy net rules. Not sure if they are exactly work or not
but they keep my kids from using all the upstream bandwidth.
If anyone has a better way, please by all means let me know. The only
thing I'm not sure of, is where it goes in the rule set. Here is where
I have mine and how it i
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:36:57PM +0545, Bikrant Neupane wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
> Well I am not looking for the count rule.
>
> Actually I have some other situation. I am trying to implement b/w shaping
> using ipfw. And i am trying to include mac address based filtering in it as
> well
Thanks for the reply.
Well I am not looking for the count rule.
Actually I have some other situation. I am trying to implement b/w shaping
using ipfw. And i am trying to include mac address based filtering in it as
well. As long as I don't implement ipfw in ether (net.link.ether.ipfw=0/1)
pkts
Hi,
When a packet hits "allow | accept | pass | permit" rule the packet is
accepted and the search is retiminated at that point.
I need to accept the packet but still want the packet to continue travers
rules further below. However, once it hits "deny | drop" rule it should be
dropped and the
