> Well, I have dmesg output and the output from dmidecode. I may be dense
> but I don't see the sSpec number in the output. Can it be derived from
> these data?
from what I understand you get the sSpec number from
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.01-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "Genuin
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:15:26AM +0200, martin hudec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:44:46PM -0500 or thereabouts, Doug Poland wrote:
> > I've inherited an SMP machine for which I've no documentation and
> > don't have convenient access to the hardware itself. The computer
> > ha
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:48:34PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Glenn Dawson wrote:
> >At 03:57 PM 10/19/2005, Kurt Buff wrote:
> [ ... ]
> >>>You want to get the same speed, FSB, and family number of Xeon, and
> >>>it is preferable to get the same stepping number if possible.
> >
> >It's better to
At 04:48 PM 10/19/2005, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 03:57 PM 10/19/2005, Kurt Buff wrote:
[ ... ]
You want to get the same speed, FSB, and family number of Xeon, and it
is preferable to get the same stepping number if possible.
It's better to match the sSpec numbers...those inc
Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 03:57 PM 10/19/2005, Kurt Buff wrote:
[ ... ]
You want to get the same speed, FSB, and family number of Xeon, and it
is preferable to get the same stepping number if possible.
It's better to match the sSpec numbers...those include the stepping, and
not all processors
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 06:26:54PM -0500 or thereabouts, Doug Poland wrote:
> Well, I have dmesg output and the output from dmidecode. I may be dense
> but I don't see the sSpec number in the output. Can it be derived from
> these data?
Well I don't know anything at all about sSpec num
At 03:57 PM 10/19/2005, Kurt Buff wrote:
Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Doug Poland wrote:
>
>> I've inherited an SMP machine for which I've no documentation and don't
>> have convenient access to the hardware itself. The computer has a
>> single Xeon 2.8GHz CPU and I'd li
Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Doug Poland wrote:
>
>> I've inherited an SMP machine for which I've no documentation and don't
>> have convenient access to the hardware itself. The computer has a
>> single Xeon 2.8GHz CPU and I'd like to purchase another CPU. Question
>> i
At 01:44 PM 10/19/2005, Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
I've inherited an SMP machine for which I've no documentation and don't
have convenient access to the hardware itself. The computer has a
single Xeon 2.8GHz CPU and I'd like to purchase another CPU. Question
is, can I simply match another Xeon
On Oct 19, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Doug Poland wrote:
I've inherited an SMP machine for which I've no documentation and
don't
have convenient access to the hardware itself. The computer has a
single Xeon 2.8GHz CPU and I'd like to purchase another CPU. Question
is, can I simply match another Xeon o
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:44:46PM -0500 or thereabouts, Doug Poland wrote:
> I've inherited an SMP machine for which I've no documentation and don't
> have convenient access to the hardware itself. The computer has a
> single Xeon 2.8GHz CPU and I'd like to purchase another CPU. Question
Hello,
I've inherited an SMP machine for which I've no documentation and don't
have convenient access to the hardware itself. The computer has a
single Xeon 2.8GHz CPU and I'd like to purchase another CPU. Question
is, can I simply match another Xeon of the same speed and expect it to
work? If
12 matches
Mail list logo
