Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-08 Thread jaymax
you have been a tremendous help That was precisely the problem and solution, the capacity from df-k is back down to 10% thanks again with your permission I'd like to post your advise on the FreeBSD Forum, of course with credits =) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inconsi

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-08 Thread Mel Flynn
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 04:14:55 jaymax wrote: > > restore -tf /disk03/dump/root2.dump > rootrestore-0.lst > > To my surprise rootrestore-0.lst contains a whole listings of ./usr/ files > ex. > > > 2926 ./usr/include/bsnmp/snmpmod.h > > 2927 ./usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_atm.

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-07 Thread jaymax
> /dev/ad0s1f 36205990 25765232 754428077%/usr > Hope someone can make some sense of this. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25338956.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-07 Thread Richard Mahlerwein
--- On Mon, 9/7/09, jaymax wrote: >From: jaymax >Subject: Re: Inconsistency in root partition size >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Date: Monday, September 7, 2009, 7:06 PM > >Mel Flynn-2 wrote: >> >> On Monday 07 September 2009 20:54:51 jaymax wrote: >>

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-07 Thread jaymax
Mel Flynn-2 wrote: > > On Monday 07 September 2009 20:54:51 jaymax wrote: > Thanks, will do a new dump, one question - how can one determine that the dumpfile produced is good? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-07 Thread Mel Flynn
On Monday 07 September 2009 20:54:51 jaymax wrote: > > mach_1# df -k > > Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/ad0s1a5076304073845963687%/ > > devfs 1 10 100%/dev > > /dev/ad0s1e505646 14212 450984

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-07 Thread jaymax
/ORNUSR > 2.0K./WARD3V1 > 2.0K./ORND02 > 2.0K./WARUSR > 1.2M./package > 2.0K./service > 4.0K./lost+found > 43M. > 43Mtotal > Do these look normal or average, compare total with df - k output of /dev/ad0s1a I don't quite kn

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-07 Thread Mel Flynn
On Monday 07 September 2009 04:24:07 jaymax wrote: > Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a507630503694 -36674 108%/ > > Don't know if the above can show anything It is of course entirely possible at this point, that the disk *is* full. Could

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 23:12:07 -0700 (PDT), jaymax wrote: > Is there somewhere I can find a listing of files and directories that are > supposed to be at the / level? if there is perchance some bizarre file, that > du is not accounting for. You can of course read "man hier" to obtain information abo

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-06 Thread jaymax
tp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25325443.html Sent from the freeb

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-06 Thread Adam Vande More
Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, jaymax wrote: > > > > Mel Flynn-2 wrote: > > > > > > No, single user mode. Root partition in single user mode can be fsck'd > and > > repaired if mounted ro in single user. The system does fsck -p by > default, > > which skips partitions marked clean. Since you can s

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-06 Thread jaymax
507630503694 -36674 108%/ Don't know if the above can show anything Could this be a kernel issue, tuning etc? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p2532

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-06 Thread Mel Flynn
On Sunday 06 September 2009 12:17:59 jaymax wrote: > ran fsck on / mounted partition, is that reasonable or possible, since it > is / or do I have to use a livefs disk like Fixit or Frenzy for this No, single user mode. Root partition in single user mode can be fsck'd and repaired if mounted ro

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-06 Thread jaymax
-y before mounting the disks Still stuck, at least we have eliminated the "open file handler" belief Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25316313.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-06 Thread Mel Flynn
On Sunday 06 September 2009 04:34:20 jaymax wrote: > I apparently have open file handles in my / partitions. > It was partitioned at 512 Mb size, used about 150Mb > df shows > Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a496M492M-36M 108%/ > adjkerntz 1

Inconsistency in root partition size

2009-09-05 Thread jaymax
ions -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25314145.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o