Daren Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a VPN between two FBSD machines using IPSEC and Racoon. I
> managed to put this together a couple of years back with (getting) old
> hardware, although I am certainly no expert. One of the machines is
> about to be replaced as it is occasionally conking out
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2005 09:33:40 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
> you wrote:
>
>>A basic tunnel (without any encryption) works fine. As soon as
>>ipsec_enable is set in rc.conf, it fails.
>>
>>setkey -D shows No SAD entries.
>
>
>>If I start a ping from 192.168.1.254
On Tue, 17 May 2005 09:33:40 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
>A basic tunnel (without any encryption) works fine. As soon as
>ipsec_enable is set in rc.conf, it fails.
>
>setkey -D shows No SAD entries.
>
>If I start a ping from 192.168.1.254 -> 192.168.0.254, the receiving
>m
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2005 12:51:50 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
> you wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Has anybody got 5.4 <-> 4.11 talking in this config, or does anybody
>>know of any pitfalls because of kernel changes?
>
>
> There should not be any issues as I have 90+ RELENG
On Mon, 16 May 2005 12:51:50 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Has anybody got 5.4 <-> 4.11 talking in this config, or does anybody
>know of any pitfalls because of kernel changes?
There should not be any issues as I have 90+ RELENG4 boxes deployed
talking to a 5.4 serve
Hi,
We have a VPN between two FBSD machines using IPSEC and Racoon. I
managed to put this together a couple of years back with (getting) old
hardware, although I am certainly no expert. One of the machines is
about to be replaced as it is occasionally conking out, and I though I
would try the 5.
