On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
In the your /etc/ipfw.sh script you should use "-f" flag when you
run
ipfw flush command.
I am, but that has nothing to do with my problem. My problem is
that,
during system boot, I'm asked the following question:
Lo
Eric F Crist wrote:
> > In the your /etc/ipfw.sh script you should use "-f" flag when you run
> > ipfw flush command.
> I am, but that has nothing to do with my problem. My problem is that,
> during system boot, I'm asked the following question:
> Loading divert daemons Are you sure? [yn]:
> The
Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>
>> Eric F Crist wrote:
>>> firewall_enable="YES"
>>> firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.sh"
>>> FWIW, ipfw.sh ONLY has count rules it it. There isn't any NAT/etc
>>> going on here. Also, IPFW was compiled w
--
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mai
On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
firewall_enable="YES"
firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.sh"
FWIW, ipfw.sh ONLY has count rules it it. There isn't any NAT/etc
going on here. Also, IPFW was compiled with DEFAULT TO ACCEPT,
since I'm not really using it for
Eric F Crist wrote:
firewall_enable="YES"
firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.sh"
FWIW, ipfw.sh ONLY has count rules it it. There isn't any NAT/etc going
on here. Also, IPFW was compiled with DEFAULT TO ACCEPT, since I'm not
really using it for anything other than accounting.
In the your /etc/ipfw.
On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:29 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
I've been working on doing some bandwidth accounting with ipfw
count rules, but I've come across a very crappy problem. After
adding the following two lines to /etc/rc.conf, I'm posed with a
question during boot:
L
