On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:38:27 -0800
"Jason C. Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's interesting to note that Gutmann's earlier work said, loosely
> "If you do this, you should be fairly certain you data is
> unrecoverable." He now says, "A few passes of random data is as good
> as can be expect
RW wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:59:44 -0800
"Jason C. Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gutmann method might be excessive but any software that uses it shows
a seriousness about security.
Gutmann himself regards the continued use of his method as "Voodoo"
Yes well. We lay people have on
