On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:23:12 -0700
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer uw-imap for IMAP and sendmail for MTA. I have found
> that since PHP imap extensions uses the uw-imap library and
> many webmail interfaces use php imap extensions, that there is
> less trouble with the cl
Cc: Barnaby Scott; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Gradual move to own mail server - strategy for noob
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:49:45 -0600
> Kenny Dail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I currently much prefer using Dovecot for IMAP, and Postfix for
&
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of RW
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 5:51 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Gradual move to own mail server - strategy for noob
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Barnaby Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:28 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Gradual move to own mail server - strategy for noob
>
>
> Hi, I'm trying to replace my current arrange
> > Are you using
> > spamd?
> not sure - it's almost 2 AM here...i'm going to hit the sack as I have an
> earlish start - i'll try to dig out the config from that mail server and send
> it out, but i can't promise it'll happen tomorrow - DO ping me if i haven't
> done it after the w/end.
I g
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:50:20 -0500
Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric,
please CC the list, so others can contribute / learn (now and from archives).
> Could you tell me what you're doing with spamassassin? I've got it
> configured and it seems to be running, but I'd like to know exa
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:49:45 -0600
Kenny Dail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently much prefer using Dovecot for IMAP, and Postfix for
> MTA. They are both quite easy to set up and customize to fit changing
> needs.
I agree . adding clamav + amavisd.new + spamassassin to the mix would wrap u
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:27:56 +0100
Barnaby Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ultimately, but not yet, I want to start using the FreeBSD machine as
> a proper mailserver - i.e. get a static IP address and point the MX
> record hosted by my provider at it.
It may not be sufficient to get a static I
> Configure Sendmail, which I accepted as the default mailer
> Install Procmail to deliver messages in Maildir format (to users' home
> directories?)
> Install Courier IMAP as the IMAP server
> Have I got this about right? Do I really need 4 separate tools to do
> this? Have I overlooked somethi
HI
On 6/27/07, Barnaby Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to replace my current arrangement for email, and though I
have read as much as possible on it, I just want to check if I am on the
right lines with what I'm planning. (Is that a legitimate use of this
list?) It's the same ol
Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:27:56AM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
>> What I _think_ I want to do is this: Install Fetchmail to get mail
>> from my various hosted mailboxes
>
>> Configure Sendmail, which I accepted as the default mailer
>
> I'd go for post
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:27:56AM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
> What I _think_ I want to do is this:
> Install Fetchmail to get mail from my various hosted mailboxes
Fetchmail works fine.
> Configure Sendmail, which I accepted as the default mailer
I'd go for postfix. It's much easier to con
> Install Fetchmail to get mail from my various hosted mailboxes
Yes. For testing purpose, why don't you create a temporary mail
account at your ISP, at yahoo, gmail, etc. provided they have IMAP,
and try retreiving emails from that account.
> Configure Sendmail, which I accepted as the default m
Hi, I'm trying to replace my current arrangement for email, and though I
have read as much as possible on it, I just want to check if I am on the
right lines with what I'm planning. (Is that a legitimate use of this
list?) It's the same old story, when you're a beginner it is very hard
to take
14 matches
Mail list logo
