RE: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post

2006-06-20 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
t;From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Hoffman >Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 6:21 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post > > >-- Forwarded message -- >From: David Hoffman <

Re: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post

2006-06-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Dennis Olvany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had a look at http://www.houfug.org/help/install_freebsd.htm and I am > afraid that you will find this article is not eligible for copyright. It > constitutes neither an artistic nor literary work. The article conveys > only facts and facts are not elig

Re: Fwd: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post

2006-06-18 Thread Dennis Olvany
...facts are not eligible for copyright. I'm afraid you're incorrect. The work in question is indeed copyrightable under the Berne Convention, which many countries have ratified, including the United States, where the content is hosted. The United States, as well as many other countries, also

Fwd: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post

2006-06-18 Thread David Hoffman
-- Forwarded message -- From: David Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 18, 2006 9:19 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post To: Dennis Olvany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, [EMA

Re: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post

2006-06-18 Thread Joe Holden
David Hoffman wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: David Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Jun 18, 2006 8:38 PM > Subject: Re: Serious breach of copyright -- First post > To: Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think a formal apology should be issued by the infringers. > > Hasn't

Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post

2006-06-18 Thread David Hoffman
-- Forwarded message -- From: David Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 18, 2006 8:38 PM Subject: Re: Serious breach of copyright -- First post To: Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think a formal apology should be issued by the infringers. Hasn't this gone on long enough? On 6/18/