Re: FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-08 Thread Raymond Wiegand
HI Jez Thanks for the quick Responce answer and the helpful and informitive link. Thanks again Ray From: Jez Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Raymond Wiegand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FreeBsd and SCO Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 06:47:38 + On Sat, Mar 06, 2

Re: FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-07 Thread Jez Hancock
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 11:06:32PM +, Raymond Wiegand wrote: > I have a question for you ? I purchased FreeBSD from COMP USA and was > wondering that seeing that SCO is going after Linux Users will they be > going after BSD user next or is BSD not at all based on their kernal or > what ever

Re: FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-06 Thread Kent Stewart
On Saturday 06 March 2004 05:30 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2004-03-06T23:06:32Z, "Raymond Wiegand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] will they be going after BSD user next or is BSD not at all > > based on their kernal or what every they claim is theirs property. > > Who can tell. They may

Re: FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-06 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2004-03-06T23:06:32Z, "Raymond Wiegand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] will they be going after BSD user next or is BSD not at all based on > their kernal or what every they claim is theirs property. Who can tell. They may decide that Solaris, Mac OS X, or Windows is also based on their

Re: FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-06 Thread Jud
On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 15:34:52 -0800, Chuck McManis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 03:06 PM 3/6/2004, Raymond Wiegand wrote: Hi I have a question for you ? I purchased FreeBSD from COMP USA and was wondering that seeing that SCO is going after Linux Users will they be going after BSD user next

Re: FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-06 Thread David Benfell
On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 15:34:52 -0800, Chuck McManis wrote: > Unlike the GPL, the BSD license has already been litigated (see AT&T vs The > Regents), there is quite a bit of clarity around the legality of the BSD > source. > Indeed it has. But SCO doesn't stand a chance with its suit against Linux

Re: FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-06 Thread Bill Campbell
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004, David Benfell wrote: >On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 23:06:32 +, Raymond Wiegand wrote: > >> I have a question for you ? I purchased FreeBSD from COMP USA and was >> wondering that seeing that SCO is going after Linux Users will they be going >> after BSD user next or is BSD not

Re: FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-06 Thread Chuck McManis
Unlike the GPL, the BSD license has already been litigated (see AT&T vs The Regents), there is quite a bit of clarity around the legality of the BSD source. --Chuck At 03:06 PM 3/6/2004, Raymond Wiegand wrote: Hi I have a question for you ? I purchased FreeBSD from COMP USA and was wondering

Re: FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-06 Thread David Benfell
On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 23:06:32 +, Raymond Wiegand wrote: > I have a question for you ? I purchased FreeBSD from COMP USA and was > wondering that seeing that SCO is going after Linux Users will they be going > after BSD user next or is BSD not at all based on their kernal or what every > th

FreeBsd and SCO

2004-03-06 Thread Raymond Wiegand
Hi I have a question for you ? I purchased FreeBSD from COMP USA and was wondering that seeing that SCO is going after Linux Users will they be going after BSD user next or is BSD not at all based on their kernal or what every they claim is theirs property. I would like to know before i swi