--On 23 January 2004 10:51 -0500 Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just wondering if it was something 'weird' such as the delay over
the tunnel being on average 'just the right delay time' to cause
problems that you wouldn't get on a LAN or something? :)
I agree that something sounds
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> >
> >> I've just setup a FreeBSD tunnel (we've tried both gif and tun [via
> >> nos-tun]) now between two fairly large networks of machines...
> >
> > What version of FreeBSD are you using? If using FreeBSD 5
--On 20 January 2004 21:40 -0500 Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Karl Pielorz wrote:
I've just setup a FreeBSD tunnel (we've tried both gif and tun [via
nos-tun]) now between two fairly large networks of machines...
What version of FreeBSD are you using? If using Fr
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> I've just setup a FreeBSD tunnel (we've tried both gif and tun [via
> nos-tun]) now between two fairly large networks of machines...
What version of FreeBSD are you using? If using FreeBSD 5.x, you may well
want to switch to 4.x for at least one more
Hi All,
I've just setup a FreeBSD tunnel (we've tried both gif and tun [via
nos-tun]) now between two fairly large networks of machines...
We've routed multiple class C networks over the tunnel - only to find the
performance is, basically abysmal :(
If I do a transfer from the machines 'wan' f
