eeBSD waridi.kihingovillage.com 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0
r255898: Thu Sep 26 22:50:31 UTC 2013 r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj
/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am wondering if there is something obvious I am missing?
--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+2547227432
Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
>
> # mptutil show adapter
> mpt0 Adapter:
>Board Name: UNUSED
>Board Assembly:
> Chip Name: C1068E
> Chip Revision: UNUSED
> RAID Levels: none
> #
>
> The problem is, I can
Colleagues,
I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
# mptutil show adapter
mpt0 Adapter:
Board Name: UNUSED
Board Assembly:
Chip Name: C1068E
Chip Revision: UNUSED
RAID Levels: none
#
The problem is, I cannot configure any RAIDs (please see
I have a Netgear FA511 PCMCIA NIC that worked fine under 9.1. Under 9.2 I
get the following message:
Oct 6 21:38:11 monitor4 kernel: dc0: port 0x1100-0x11ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on cardbus0
Oct 6 21:38:11 monitor4 kernel: dc0: attaching PHYs failed
This used to work under 9.1, does anyone kno
2013/10/5 Polytropon
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 09:40:31 +0300, Juris Kaminskis wrote:
> > i recompiled my kernel with more verbose output and I see following
> errors
> > before it stops:
> >
> > procfs registered
> > panic: No usable event timer found!
> > cpuid=0
> > KDB: stack backtrace:
> > db_tra
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 09:40:31 +0300, Juris Kaminskis wrote:
> i recompiled my kernel with more verbose output and I see following errors
> before it stops:
>
> procfs registered
> panic: No usable event timer found!
> cpuid=0
> KDB: stack backtrace:
> db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper
i recompiled my kernel with more verbose output and I see following errors
before it stops:
procfs registered
panic: No usable event timer found!
cpuid=0
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a
panic() at panic+0x1d8/frame
initclocks()
mi_startup(
Hello,
I am desperate trying to build FreeBSD 9.2. The same happens with
FreeBSD-Current. When I build 9.1 kernel without building world everything
is ok.
My svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: http://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/base/release/9.2.0
Repository Root: http://svn0
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013, at 18:54, ot...@ahhyes.net wrote:
>
> * I run powerdns recursor for resolution of domain names. Despite
> having the recursor as being one of the first things
> in rc.conf to start (certainly before ntpdate), ntpdate decides to run
> before the recursor has started. This cau
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 14:01, Brett Glass wrote:
How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
lists. It's never clear until the release drops wh
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 14:01, Brett Glass wrote:
>> How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be?
For me freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 went smooth on my workstation
laptop, the userland works fine :-)
I remember myself
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 14:01, Brett Glass wrote:
> How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
> improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
> messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
> lists. It's never clear until
Le Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:01:26 -0600,
Brett Glass a écrit :
Hello,
> How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
> improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
> messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
> lists. It's
On 9/30/2013 15:01, Brett Glass wrote:
How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The improvements
are welcome, but there have been a few troubling messages about kernel
panics and VM issues on the various mailing lists. It's never clear
until the release drops whether thes
How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
lists. It's never clear until the release drops whether these are
actual problems with the softwa
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1619404
It is helpful too…
On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM wrote:
>
>>
>> How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth mouse. Is
>> it su
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:22:15 +0100, John wrote:
> > If you don't use a custom kernel, why not use freebsd-update
> > and follow the 9.2-RELEASE path with the security updates?
>
> Not sure if this is logic or "religon", but freebsd-update makes me
> nervous. I'm allergic to automatic anything unle
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:17:02AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> 9.2-RELEASE hasn't been released yet. :-)
well yes, there is that I suppose ;)
> If you don't use a custom kernel, why not use freebsd-update
> and follow the 9.2-RELEASE path with the security updates?
Not sure if this is logic or "
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:28:25 +0100, John wrote:
> Is it "safe" to start using 9.2 in the svn repos? I have a line like
> this in a daily crontab:
>
> svn co svn://svn.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src
>
> Can I change that 9.1 to 9.2 now, or should I wait? I aim to follow
> 9.2-R with
Hello list,
Is it "safe" to start using 9.2 in the svn repos? I have a line like
this in a daily crontab:
svn co svn://svn.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src
Can I change that 9.1 to 9.2 now, or should I wait? I aim to follow
9.2-R with security updates.
thanks,
--
John
_
Thank you very much.
I will wait for 9.2 release or switch to Linux which works but it is not hat I
want it…
On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM wrote:
>
>>
>> How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I lik
On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM wrote:
>
> How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth mouse. Is
> it supported?
>
> I try Linux Mint and it works perfect. I am downloading live CD for NetBSD
> (jibbed) and I will see how is works but I like to in
Type: GPU
Bus: PCIe
PCIe Lane Width: x16
VRAM (Total): 512 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth mouse. Is it
supported?
I try Linux Mint and it works perfect. I am downloading live CD for NetBSD
(jibbed) and I will see how is
To follow up on this issue, at one point the stats were down to this:
extended device statistics
device r/s w/skr/skw/s qlen svc_t %b
da00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0
da10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0
da2 127.9 0.0
On 08/08/2013 12:42, Terje Elde wrote:
On 8. aug. 2013, at 00:08, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
As a suggestion, what happens if you read from the drives directly? Boot in
single user and try reading a Gb or two using /bin/dd. It might eliminate or
confirm a problem with ZFS.
If not too inconvenien
On 8. aug. 2013, at 00:08, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> As a suggestion, what happens if you read from the drives directly? Boot in
> single user and try reading a Gb or two using /bin/dd. It might eliminate or
> confirm a problem with ZFS.
If not too inconvenient, it'd be very interesting to see w
On 07/08/2013 21:36, J David wrote:
It feels like some sort of issue with the
bus/controller/kernel/driver/ZFS that is affecting all the drives
equally.
Also, even ls takes forever (10-30 seconds for "ls -lh /") but when it
eventually does finish, "time ls -lh /" reports:
0.02 real
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:15 PM, James Gosnell wrote:
> Maybe one of your drives is bad, so it's constantly doing error correction?
Not according to SMART; all the drives report no problems. Also, all
the drives seem to perform in lock-step for both reading and writing.
E.g. when one drive in an
Maybe one of your drives is bad, so it's constantly doing error correction?
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:48 PM, J David wrote:
> We have a machine running 9.2-RC1 that's getting terrible disk I/O
> performance. Its performance has always been pretty bad, but it
> didn't really become clear how bad
We have a machine running 9.2-RC1 that's getting terrible disk I/O
performance. Its performance has always been pretty bad, but it
didn't really become clear how bad until we did a zpool replace on one
of the drives and realized it was going to take 3 weeks to rebuild a
<1TB drive.
The hardware s
How to svn to 9-stable, make world (etc)? How to delete all installed ports?
And then rm -rf /usr/local/*?
Nice hints!
Felix
发自我的 iPad
在 2013-8-5，3:53，John 写道：
> On 02/08/2013 16:54, John wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I'm trying to install virtualbox on a new mach
On 02/08/2013 16:54, John wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm trying to install virtualbox on a new machine running
> FreeBSD 9.2-BETA2 #0 r253698. The ports version is 324162. Is it a
> problem with the port or my machine?
This was fixed by:
commenting everything out of /etc/make.
Hello list,
I'm trying to install virtualbox on a new machine running
FreeBSD 9.2-BETA2 #0 r253698. The ports version is 324162. Is it a
problem with the port or my machine?
Here is my make.conf:
# cat /etc/make.conf
CC=clang
CXX=clang++
CPP=clang-cpp
# add
33 matches
Mail list logo
