Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to "ia64" distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itani
Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to "ia64" distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itani
Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to "ia64" distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itani
My box is a web/mail/vpn/router/samba (yes i know there shouldn't be
that many services
on the box, but tell my boss that) and all the apps are working like a charm.
his money his problem. overspending on hardware it's quite common, instead
of paying more employees with the same money.
___
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Johan Hendriks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>> the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
>>> some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
>
>>what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
>
> Nvidia
>> Nvidia drivers.
>>
>> Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit
>> Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia?
>> Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?
>because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them
Nvidia drivers.
Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit
Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia?
Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?
because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them)
=?windows-1250?Q?Ott_K=F6stner?= writes:
> I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD on my desktop, just
> because of Nvidia drivers.
>
> Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to
> expect 64 bit Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is
> the problem with
Johan Hendriks wrote:
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
Nvidia!!!
I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD
>> the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
>> some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
>what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
Nvidia!!!
Regards,
Johan Hendriks
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AV
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
___
freebs
So use the amd64 ;)
Is the amd64 distribution mature enough, as compared to the i386?
yes
Aren't there any problems to be expected to arrive, months after
initial install and way in the production usage ??
no.
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
I never googled it before, but 2 sec gave me
http://www.freebsd.o
If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what
distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ?
Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386:
disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb; ia
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
>
> Hi,
>> All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
>>
> So this would point to "ia64" distribution?
> But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
> tells for ia64: Cur
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to "ia64" distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itanium and Itanium2
There
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
368 vs 372 is that the 64 bit is compiled for 64 bit, and uses a little more
space.
/ Ebbe
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
> Intel Harpert
If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what
distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ?
Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386:
disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb; ia
18 matches
Mail list logo
