In a message dated 11/11/04 1:36:28 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>FreeBSD 4.10: 42% interrupt usage
>FreeBSD 5.3: 58% interrupt usage
>Thanks for your test results. Was DEVICE_POLLING enables in the kernel and
>the sysctl?
No, it wasnt
___
In a message dated 11/11/04 5:38:34 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Given these results, I would conclude that the raw routing stack in 5.3
> is 35-40% slower than its 4.x counterpart.
>
> The tests are easy enough to duplicate,
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Given these results, I would conclude that the raw routing stack in 5.3
> is 35-40% slower than its 4.x counterpart.
>
> The tests are easy enough to duplicate, so there is no reason to
> question the numbers. Feel free to try it yourself. Obviousl
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 00:04:44 +0530, Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 23:57
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 23:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD 5.3 Network performance tests
As promised, I've tested the basic network stack for 5.3 -RELEAS
As promised, I've tested the basic network stack for 5.3 -RELEASE
The results follow:
Hardware:
Celeron 1.7Ghz processor
Dual onboard Intel NICs, fxp driver
Intel 845G chipset
256MB Ram, 120MB allocated to the kernel.
Setup:
Traffic Generator -> FreeBSD System -> Server
The FreeBSD system is s
