On Tuesday 13 June 2006 08:53, Nikolas Britton wrote:
> On 6/12/06, Jim Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Heh, FreeBSD is #1 to me because it is the most painless operating
> > system I've ever used...
> >
> > Ignoring the 5.x installer. Never used pre
not saying that its not, only that I know
> a
> > lot of ISPs and more of them are running 4
> than
> > 6. In fact I know exactly 0 running 6. So
> > proclaiming that Freebsd is #1 without
> qualifying
> > what version they are running doesn't really
> say
> > a
On 6/12/06, Jim Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Heh, FreeBSD is #1 to me because it is the most painless operating
system I've ever used...
Ignoring the 5.x installer. Never used pre-5.x
-Jim
What do you mean 5.x? FreeBSD never made 5.x. They went straight from
4 to 6 lik
Heh, FreeBSD is #1 to me because it is the most painless operating
system I've ever used...
Ignoring the 5.x installer. Never used pre-5.x
-Jim
On 6/12/06, Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
--- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I fo
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danial Thom
>Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:06 PM
>To: Kris Kennaway
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Beech Rintoul
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD is #1
>
>
>
>
>--- Kri
> While trying to introduce FreeBSD into a Micro$oft only house, I've heard the
> following many times:
>
> "Never heard of FreeBSD" and "Show me some documentation and stats".
>
> Regardless of the actual version, the stats are accurate for those providers.
> They reflect overall uptime and
d. It is
stable.
Kris
I'm not saying that its not, only that I know a
lot of ISPs and more of them are running 4 than
6. In fact I know exactly 0 running 6. So
proclaiming that Freebsd is #1 without qualifying
what version they are running doesn't really say
anything.
We're sm
e
> > intensive stress testing
> > and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is
> > stable.
> >
> > Kris
>
> I'm not saying that its not, only that I know a
> lot of ISPs and more of them are running 4 than
> 6. In fact I know exactly 0 running 6. So
>
gt; stable.
>
> Kris
>
I'm not saying that its not, only that I know a
lot of ISPs and more of them are running 4 than
6. In fact I know exactly 0 running 6. So
proclaiming that Freebsd is #1 without qualifying
what version they are running doesn't really say
anything.
DT
_
On Monday 12 June 2006 13:36, Danial Thom wrote:
> Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
>
> --- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > I found this on Netcraft and thought I'd share
> > it:
> >
> > Six Hosting Companies Most Reliable Hoster in
> > May.
> >
> > Six hosting companies share the top spot
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700, Danial Thom wrote:
> Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more intensive stress testing
and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is stable.
Kris
pgp3Ibgo80nS3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
--- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I found this on Netcraft and thought I'd share
> it:
>
> Six Hosting Companies Most Reliable Hoster in
> May.
>
> Six hosting companies share the top spot this
> month, with INetU, Hostway,
> IPower, New York Internet, Pair
I found this on Netcraft and thought I'd share it:
Six Hosting Companies Most Reliable Hoster in May.
Six hosting companies share the top spot this month, with INetU, Hostway,
IPower, New York Internet, Pair Networks andTiscali all sharing the top spot
as the most reliable hosting company site
13 matches
Mail list logo
