se Linux, so I don't know if Chrome is available
for FreeBSD. When I google (resp. startpage.com search) for FreeBSD and
Chrome, it seems to be that the hits aren't about Chrome, but Chromium
instead.
Chromium doesn't include Adobe Flash,
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/Ch
f Chrome is available
for FreeBSD. When I google (resp. startpage.com search) for FreeBSD and
Chrome, it seems to be that the hits aren't about Chrome, but Chromium
instead.
Chromium doesn't include Adobe Flash,
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/ChromiumBrowserVsGoogleChrome .
Sorry
On 12.10.2013 11:02, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> If you really need to visit sites that need Adobe Flash, you perhaps
> should use the google-chrome browser. For some websites with flash
> content, we don't need flash anymore, just modern HTML5 capable web
> browsers. For *nix ther
If you really need to visit sites that need Adobe Flash, you perhaps
should use the google-chrome browser. For some websites with flash
content, we don't need flash anymore, just modern HTML5 capable web
browsers. For *nix there never will be a current version for flashplayer
Hi,
The current linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.310 version has some troubles
on my machine (with Firefox).
Sometimes, when a flash component is displayed and you scroll a bit the
window the flash break and goes grey, you're forced to reload the page.
I'm using the Intel new KMS driv
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> On 2013-06-16 13:39, Jerry wrote:
>> I saw the answer to this a while back, but I cannot find it now.
> youtube-dl -t 'filename'
You can also use this trick to work on youtube directly:
This video use flash player:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:57:09 +0200
Matthias Apitz articulated:
> El día Sunday, June 16, 2013 a las 07:39:30AM -0400, Jerry escribió:
>
> > I saw the answer to this a while back, but I cannot find it now.
>
> dom.ipc.plugins.enabled = false
>
> to be set via about:config in FF
Perhaps that sho
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Jerry wrote:
> After working fine for quite a while, this problem has started. When
> attempting to play videos on "youtube", I am greeted with a message
> that states "Adobe Flash Player is Required for Video Playback?
Some clips are fo
El día Sunday, June 16, 2013 a las 07:39:30AM -0400, Jerry escribió:
> I saw the answer to this a while back, but I cannot find it now.
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled = false
to be set via about:config in FF
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribb
I saw the answer to this a while back, but I cannot find it now.
After working fine for quite a while, this problem has started. When
attempting to play videos on "youtube", I am greeted with a message
that states "Adobe Flash Player is Required for Video Playback? It
then offers m
honest, this is really the best solution for all platforms,
> win/mac/bsd/etc. I don't have flash installed on any of my machines: I
> use a plugin that downloads the mp4 and auto opens it in a local video
> player. This always works, you can jump/rewind without constant
> bufferi
ardt wrote:
> hello, world\n
>
> I have trouble playing Youtube videos in flash format in Firefox. This
> has worked in the past, but for a few weeks now, the flash videos
> display as a b/w noise background picture with a message centered "To
> render this video you need the A
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:37:49 +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> El 23/04/2013 21:24, "Walter Hurry" escribió:
>>
>> FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE on amd64.
>>
>> I have installed Flash according to the instructions in the handbook.
>> When I do 'about:p
gt; Perhaps the answer is somewhere in the thread "[Solved] Youtube & Flash
> Videos broken?", but OTOH, Flash is outdated and that could be the issue
> too.
Yep, that's the thread I was referring to. It worked for me.
>
> I don't have Flash or
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 21:37 +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> That's an issue with Firefox. Search the list. There is a setting you have
> to change in Firefox in order to avoid that problem.
Perhaps the answer is somewhere in the thread "[Solved] Youtube & Flash
Video
El 23/04/2013 21:24, "Walter Hurry" escribió:
>
> FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE on amd64.
>
> I have installed Flash according to the instructions in the handbook.
> When I do 'about:plugins' in Firefox, I get the following response:
>
> Shockwave Flash
choice, if
you want to consume such stuff.
Current version is 11.7,
http://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html .
But for *nix the last version is 11.2.
"Adobe Flash Player 11.2 will be the last version to target Linux as a
supported platform. Adobe will continue to provide
FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE on amd64.
I have installed Flash according to the instructions in the handbook.
When I do 'about:plugins' in Firefox, I get the following response:
Shockwave Flash
File: npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
Version:
Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202
2013-04-09 12:22, Polytropon skrev:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:15:35 +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
I've also seen that the '-h' option did tell a lot of things, except the
the reqirement to quote the URL...
This is something you'll find in "man csh" or "man bash". :-)
Now I get the following:
me@p
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:22:02PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:15:35 +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> > I've also seen that the '-h' option did tell a lot of things, except the
> > the requirement to quote the URL...
>
> This is something you'll find in "man csh" or "man bash"
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:15:35 +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> I've also seen that the '-h' option did tell a lot of things, except the
> the reqirement to quote the URL...
This is something you'll find in "man csh" or "man bash". :-)
> Now I get the following:
>
> me@pollux:~ % youtube-dl -v "http:/
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:58:30AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:03:13 +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 12:09:32AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > > If it's just about YouTube video, why not use youtube-dl and
> > > mplayer? I haven't tested it for
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:38:16AM +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:28:15 -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > Please excuse the top post
>
> Why?
>
because most or all email is presented in "oldest posts first."
it is more work to decode. [[ esp'ly if you're o
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:28:15 -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> Please excuse the top post
Why?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsub
ying the URL from
> the URL line or via the "Copy link address" function; then
> just type 'youtube-dl "', press the middle mouse key, '"'
> and Enter.
>
> As youtube-dl doesn't have a manpage, you can use
>
> % youtube-dl -h
&
L from
the URL line or via the "Copy link address" function; then
just type 'youtube-dl "', press the middle mouse key, '"'
and Enter.
As youtube-dl doesn't have a manpage, you can use
% youtube-dl -h
to get a list of supported command line opti
rk for everything. :-)
>
> Can you please help me how to find the right URLs for youtube-dl ?
>
> For example on
> http://www.youtube.com/user/ConcertosLive/videos
>
> When I copy URLs with mouse in opera I always get
> "youtube-dl: No match."
>
> (opera a
. :-)
>
> Can you please help me how to find the right URLs for youtube-dl ?
>
> For example on
> http://www.youtube.com/user/ConcertosLive/videos
>
> When I copy URLs with mouse in opera I always get
> "youtube-dl: No match."
>
> (opera and flash work fine
ht URLs for youtube-dl ?
For example on
http://www.youtube.com/user/ConcertosLive/videos
When I copy URLs with mouse in opera I always get
"youtube-dl: No match."
(opera and flash work fine for playing and also for downloading the
the ogg file)
I definitely prefer the command line too
why it should be set to
> 'false'? Thanks
An explanation on Adobe forum ...
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/666110
32d reply ...
...
The crash protection feature in Firefox 3.6 is enabled for
certain plugins only. The four preferences that we
modified he
El día Monday, April 08, 2013 a las 11:04:41AM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere
escribió:
> Le Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:38:55 +0200,
> Jens Schweikhardt a écrit :
>
> > # We've had a thread about it in the forums, with a couple of
> > workarounds: # http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=38627
> >
> >
om/watch?v=re9TpkdTYGw
Without dom.ipc.plugins.enabled=false, Youtube says that flash is not
installed.
(9.1-STABLE/amd64, firefox-17.0.4,1 (firefox-esr),
linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.275)
Regards.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:05:19 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> If users would stop visiting bad programmed sites, we would get better
> programmed websites, so IMO we shouldn't fix the issues others cause,
> it's their task to fix their websites.
There's hope in browsers imple
mer 2011. This is since almost 3 years ago.
> Using Flash is way
> harder than it needs to be on FreeBSD.
You are right about this. It should be a selectable (switchable)
function of the browser. Do you have a proprietary plugin to have
text in blue color? One to display PNG images? Another on
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 07:44 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> You hear FreeBSD users who claim
> that they never use Flash, which in itself is an interesting
> statement.
> If it doesn't work, then obviously you cannot take advantage of it. I
> suspect at least 50% of them are liars. Th
More about complications and possible cause of this problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/177404
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
t; On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 23:39 +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ywn2Lz5zmYg
> > > >
> > > > Firefox 20.0 Arch Linux x86_64 can't play this video too.
> > > > Neither flash, nor gnash
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 05:53:17PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
# On Sat, 6 Apr 2013, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
#
# > I have trouble playing Youtube videos in flash format in Firefox. This
# > has worked in the past, but for a few weeks now, the flash videos
# > display as a b/w noise b
/www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ywn2Lz5zmYg
> > >
> > > Firefox 20.0 Arch Linux x86_64 can't play this video too. Neither
> > > flash, nor gnash installed. Perhaps it's a video with a commercial,
> > > before the video can be watched? Wicked!
> > >
>
/www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ywn2Lz5zmYg
> > >
> > > Firefox 20.0 Arch Linux x86_64 can't play this video too. Neither
> > > flash, nor gnash installed. Perhaps it's a video with a commercial,
> > > before the video can be watched? Wicked!
> > >
> >
6_64 can't play this video too. Neither
> > flash, nor gnash installed. Perhaps it's a video with a commercial,
> > before the video can be watched? Wicked!
> >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUPtiYiMCbQ
> >
> > Video and audio are ok for thi
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 15:23:49 -1000, Parv wrote:
> I have tried some extensions -- e.g. "Flash and Video
> Download", "Download Helper" -- that require a bit of video to be
> played initially before it can be downloaded (outside of YouTube;
> for YouTube videos, I
all platforms,
> win/mac/bsd/etc. I don't have flash installed on any of my
> machines: I use a plugin that downloads the mp4 and auto opens it
> in a local video player.
Is the plugin that you speak of called "Download YouTube Videos as
MP4"? I have tried some extensions --
in message <20130407000932.678efc0d.free...@edvax.de>,
wrote Polytropon thusly...
>
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 23:39:11 +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
...
> > Is anyone else but me able to play flash, like for example "The
> > true science of multiple universes" in
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
I have trouble playing Youtube videos in flash format in Firefox. This
has worked in the past, but for a few weeks now, the flash videos
display as a b/w noise background picture with a message centered "To
render this video you need the Adobe
I can work around this by downloading the files with clive and watching
with mplayer, but I'd like to make this work again.
To be honest, this is really the best solution for all platforms,
win/mac/bsd/etc. I don't have flash installed on any of my machines: I
use a plugin that
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 23:39:11 +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> Since I haven't heard the FreeBSD community screaming "Gimme back
> my Youtube!!!1!", I'll bite. What could the problem be? Is anyone
> else but me able to play flash, like for example "The true scienc
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 23:53 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 23:39 +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ywn2Lz5zmYg
>
> Firefox 20.0 Arch Linux x86_64 can't play this video too. Neither flash,
> nor gnash installed. Perh
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 23:39 +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ywn2Lz5zmYg
Firefox 20.0 Arch Linux x86_64 can't play this video too. Neither flash,
nor gnash installed. Perhaps it's a video with a commercial, before the
video can be watched? Wi
hello, world\n
I have trouble playing Youtube videos in flash format in Firefox. This
has worked in the past, but for a few weeks now, the flash videos
display as a b/w noise background picture with a message centered "To
render this video you need the Adobe Flash Player. Install latest
Hi,
Glad to hear that you're on the market for usb driver memory, we are
experienced in this field for about 8 years.
There is much experience in usb driver memory with higher quality.
What’s more, we have our own R&D to meet any of your requirements.
There are usb drive
Hi,
Glad to hear that you're on the market for usb driver memory, we are
experienced in this field for about 8 years.
There is much experience in usb driver memory with higher quality.
What’s more, we have our own R&D to meet any of your requirements.
There are usb drive
In message <51543b7a.4030...@qeng-ho.org>,
Arthur Chance wrote:
>On 03/28/13 10:32, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> It is possible, I would guess, that dd may notice the EOF occuring
>> before it has filled up an entire input buffer, and then just quit
>> at that point, _without_ writing the part
On 03/28/13 10:32, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message <5153feff.4090...@sneakertech.com>, you wrote:
I have filed the following PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177431
Er, don't take my word for law:
I didn't. I won't.
I have *no* idea if 1M is a good idea
Any size
In message <5153feff.4090...@sneakertech.com>, you wrote:
>
>> I have filed the following PR:
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177431
>
>Er, don't take my word for law:
I didn't. I won't.
>I have *no* idea if 1M is a good idea
Any size which is an exact multiple of the physic
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:27:43 -0400
Quartz wrote:
>
> > I have filed the following PR:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177431
>
> Er, don't take my word for law: I have *no* idea if 1M is a good idea
> for most systems, I'm not even sure if it's optimal for mine. I did a
> s
I have filed the following PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177431
Er, don't take my word for law: I have *no* idea if 1M is a good idea
for most systems, I'm not even sure if it's optimal for mine. I did a
single test with three random values at different orders of magnitude
In message <5153a2fd.8020...@sneakertech.com>, you wrote:
>
>> Why exactly is the "bs=10240" is there? Wouldn't the default of 512
>> do just as well?
>
>Modern systems can read and write far more than 512 bytes per operation.
>Sticking with 512 would work perfectly fine, but you'd be
Why exactly is the "bs=10240" is there? Wouldn't the default of 512
do just as well?
Modern systems can read and write far more than 512 bytes per operation.
Sticking with 512 would work perfectly fine, but you'd be imposing an
unnecessary bottleneck and the copy would be a lot sl
On 28/03/2013 8:10 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Question:
Why exactly is "conv=sync" is there?
I found this on http://www.mkssoftware.com/docs/man1/dd.1.asp
If you specified conv=sync and this input block is smaller than the
specified input block size, dd pads it to the specified si
to tape). conv=sync isn't needed since the source file is
already a multiple of the target device blocksize (512 bytes), and bs=64k
would be much faster when writing to cheap flash devices like USB sticks
since they don't have a write cache and individual writes are slowish.
--
I've never used any FreeBSD memstick image before, but now I have reason
to do so.
I'm reading the instructions for creating a bootable memstick that are
located on this page:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/announce.html
which include the following example of how to perform the copy:
Hi,
Glad to hear that you're on the market for usb driver memory, we are
experienced in this field for about 8 years.
There is much experience in usb driver memory with higher quality.
What’s more, we have our own R&D to meet any of your requirements.
There are usb drive
On 02/01/13 22:06, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> If I understand correctly, it is iso image from ssd manufacturer.
> They tend to think everybody uses win and has cd drive. Quick
> search might give easy answer, if win/linux box is available. You
> could try out unetbootin. Tutorial says it takes an image a
If I understand correctly, it is iso image from ssd manufacturer.
They tend to think everybody uses win and has cd drive. Quick
search might give easy answer, if win/linux box is available. You
could try out unetbootin. Tutorial says it takes an image and
makes bootable usb stick.
Best regards
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 02/01/13 11:03, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Please see the below site for a script to convert the .ISO into a .IMG that
can be dd written to the thumb drive
http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=4361
That looks to be specific to converting a FreeBSD
t;> Subject: Crucial SSD firmware upgrade -- usb flash drive issues
>>
>> I've got a Crucial m4 SSD which needs a firmware upgrade.
>> From the Crucial website I've downloaded an image which supposedly is an
>> iso image bootable from either CD or a usb stick.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gary Aitken
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:55 PM
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
> Subject: Crucial SSD firmware upgrade -- usb flash drive issu
I've got a Crucial m4 SSD which needs a firmware upgrade.
>From the Crucial website I've downloaded an image which supposedly is an iso
image bootable from either CD or a usb stick.
Since the fbsd install images are different for booting from cd and usb
flash drives (the f
Dear Manager
Have a nice day
This is Jerry from Shenzhen of China, writing to you to enter into business
relationship with you. We are the professional manufacturer
with nearly 6 years of experience oversea business in supplying USB Flash
Drives, Tablet PC, Keyboard, Mouse, MP3, Digital Photo
Le Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:13:11 +0930,
Shane Ambler a écrit :
> I have a GT 520 with 9.0 amd64 and found that v304.43 refused to run
> my second monitor so I went back to v295.
Did you check the resolution of the second monitor? Here on my box, v304
does not handle any more the previous resolution
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2012-September/002066.html
This is very much related.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-question
On 03/10/2012 04:46, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I have a nvidia GT 630 and use the flash plugin, I've got a very
strange problem, on youtube (or any flash video), the colors are just
broken.
This is happening on a FreeBSD 9.0 amd64 box with
linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.238 nvidia-d
On 02/10/2012 21:16, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I have a nvidia GT 630 and use the flash plugin, I've got a very strange
problem, on youtube (or any flash video), the colors are just broken.
See:
1. http://markand.malikania.fr/1.png
2. http://markand.malikania.fr/2.png
On the s
Hello,
I have a nvidia GT 630 and use the flash plugin, I've got a very strange
problem, on youtube (or any flash video), the colors are just broken.
See:
1. http://markand.malikania.fr/1.png
2. http://markand.malikania.fr/2.png
On the second picture, the man is supposed to wear a
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:44:32 Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:20:13 -0500
>
> ajtiM articulated:
> > Works on Opera here too but after updtae Firefox to 14.0.1 doesn't
> > work on Firefox. Ans as I red on Linux forums they have a problem
> > with Firefox 14.0.1 too.
>
> This one is not w
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:20:13 -0500
ajtiM articulated:
> Works on Opera here too but after updtae Firefox to 14.0.1 doesn't
> work on Firefox. Ans as I red on Linux forums they have a problem
> with Firefox 14.0.1 too.
This one is not working with Firefox 14.0.1 either.
http://www.huffingtonpost.
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 00:42:42 Jeff Tipton wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 05:18, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:55:46 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
> >>> Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles
> >>> work for yo
On 07/31/2012 05:18, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:55:46 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles work
for you ?
http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:55:46 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
> > Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles
> > work
> > for you ?
> >
> > http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
> >
> > [...]
>
> Wor
On Monday 30 July 2012 16:49:09 Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, ajtiM wrote:
> > It doesn't work on my computer:
> > FreeBSD 9.0 Release, KDE 4.8.4
> >
> > I updated Firefox 13 to 14.0.1 and flash doesn't work anymore (on Opera
> > wo
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, ajtiM wrote:
It doesn't work on my computer:
FreeBSD 9.0 Release, KDE 4.8.4
I updated Firefox 13 to 14.0.1 and flash doesn't work anymore (on Opera works).
In pluginred.dat I have:
[INVALID]
/usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so:$
133671480
On Monday 30 July 2012 15:55:46 Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
> > <<
> > I've not experienced any problem with sites that
> > use Flash, including Youtube.
> >
> >
> >
> > Okay, so can you please go to th
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
<<
I've not experienced any problem with sites that
use Flash, including Youtube.
Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles work
for you ?
http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
I
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
<<
I've not experienced any problem with sites that
use Flash, including Youtube.
Hi Jeff,
Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles work
for you ?
recent linux-flash 12.x do not work with any recent
<<
I've not experienced any problem with sites that
use Flash, including Youtube.
>>
Hi Jeff,
Okay, so can you please go to the URL below and see whether the bubbles
work for you ?
http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
I don't have a probl
via the Discovery channel's website :
http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
The game needs Adobe flash player. So I installed
linux-f10-flashplugin11. But firefox 5.0 does not seem to integrate
with it well. I then tried installing a couple of more ports,
incl
bsite :
http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
The game needs Adobe flash player. So I installed
linux-f10-flashplugin11. But firefox 5.0 does not seem to integrate
with it well. I then tried installing a couple of more ports,
including swfdec and gnash. Still firefox won&#
//news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
>
> The game needs Adobe flash player. So I installed
> linux-f10-flashplugin11. But firefox 5.0 does not seem to integrate
> with it well. I then tried installing a couple of more ports,
> including swfdec and gnash. Still f
Adobe flash player. So I installed
linux-f10-flashplugin11. But firefox 5.0 does not seem to integrate with
it well. I then tried installing a couple of more ports, including
swfdec and gnash. Still firefox won't play the game.
Is there something special I need to do ? Thanks for any help.
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:44:28AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >You don't. You wipe the FAT32 with fdisk and make a FreeBSD slice on it.
> >Then you can bsdlabel it with one partition and newfs it. Or you can
>
> repeat 100 times more that you "have to" make fdisk and bsdlabel. you
> don't
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 09/07/2012 11:16, Polytropon wrote:
If you're talking about an MS-DOS disk, then yes, it contains
a DOS partition which is formatted. In FreeBSD, we would call
it a slice (slice == "DOS primary partition"). In this case,
there is no (sub)partitioning, th
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:00:40 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 16:06, Ian Smith wrote:
> > In general they're not distinct in usage from any other type of disk.
>
> The more expensive disks of course support TRIM so you'd want to pass -t to
> newfs to enable it.
Thanks. Next time I bl
On 09/07/2012 13:29, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
only your fault, not FreeBSD. Why you connected your data disk at
first place.
I didn't say it was FreeBSD's fault. If I thought it was, I would have
fixed it!
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.
A company I worked with were still distributing files on floppy disks as
recently as 2009.
quite funny :)
They _are_ obsolete, but I suspect plenty of people still
use them.
unless it is a normal way of using it.
That's right - I was thinking of my system where I destroyed all the data on
On 09/07/2012 13:17, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
they use "dangerously obsolete" mode. nobody use them at all.
A company I worked with were still distributing files on floppy disks as
recently as 2009. They _are_ obsolete, but I suspect plenty of people
still use them.
unless it is a normal wa
Floppy disks aren't partitioned/sliced - they use 'dangerously dedicated'
they use "dangerously obsolete" mode. nobody use them at all.
disk's empty. If you're on an old system and run 'gpart show da0' and don't
see a partition table it's quite easy to forget to check if da0 itself
contains
On 09/07/2012 11:16, Polytropon wrote:
If you're talking about an MS-DOS disk, then yes, it contains
a DOS partition which is formatted. In FreeBSD, we would call
it a slice (slice == "DOS primary partition"). In this case,
there is no (sub)partitioning, the _slice_ carries the MS-DOS
file system
If you're talking about an MS-DOS disk, then yes, it contains
a DOS partition which is formatted. In FreeBSD, we would call
it a slice (slice == "DOS primary partition"). In this case,
there is no (sub)partitioning, the _slice_ carries the MS-DOS
unless you need windows 98 support partitionless
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:27:23 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> You mean the non-subdivided 1.44 MB or other capacity of a floppy
> is called a partition?
Let's try to use the correct terminology.
If you're talking about an MS-DOS disk, then yes, it contains
a DOS partition which is formatted. In Fre
1 - 100 of 1388 matches
Mail list logo
