Kevin Stevens wrote:
On Friday, Jan 24, 2003, at 16:40 US/Pacific, Bill Moran wrote:
See
/usr/share/doc/papers/diskperf.ascii.gz
on your system. This is the authoritative resource as to why those
settings
are they way they are.
?? Sure that's the correct doc? It involves throughput tests
On Friday, Jan 24, 2003, at 16:40 US/Pacific, Bill Moran wrote:
See
/usr/share/doc/papers/diskperf.ascii.gz
on your system. This is the authoritative resource as to why those
settings
are they way they are.
?? Sure that's the correct doc? It involves throughput tests of
different disk syst
Kevin Stevens wrote:
Also, why is "up to a factor of three in throughput" lost over the 10%
setting? Is that another allusion to space optimization going into
effect, or is there something else happening? I guess I don't understand
the ramifications of the minfree setting. Any suggestions or re
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 19:03
Subject: Filesystem tuning parameters
> I have a confusion about apparent conflicts between the minfree setting
> and time/space optimization.
>
> Per the manpage:
> minfree -
> Specify the percentage of space held back from nor
I have a confusion about apparent conflicts between the minfree setting
and time/space optimization.
Per the manpage:
minfree -
Specify the percentage of space held back from normal users; the
minimum free space threshold. The default value used is 8%.
This value can be set to zero, however up to
