On 2/19/06, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When running this command: portsdb -Uu, I am frequently presented with a
> message similar to this one:
>
> portsdb -Uu
> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX ent
When running this command: portsdb -Uu, I am frequently presented with a
message similar to this one:
portsdb -Uu
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: apr-gdbm-db4-1.2.2_2
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-2.0.7
Warning
enerating INDEX.tmp - please
> > wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.1
> > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: fvwm-imlib-2.4.18
> > Done.
> > done
> > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11406
> > port entries found
> > .1000...
On Sunday 25 July 2004 07:24 am, Anders Mansson wrote:
> Hi! When trying to update my ports with 'portsdb -Uu', I get the
> following error message:
>
> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.1
&
Hi! When trying to update my ports with 'portsdb -Uu', I get the
following error message:
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.1
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: fvwm-imlib-2.4.18
Done.
done
[Updating the p
er 4.4
installation CDROM I cvsup'd using 'tag=RELEASE_4_4_0', then cvsup'd
again with 'tag=.' However portsdb -uU still failed:
make_index: fandango-0.2.5: no entry for /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: *** Error code 1
Warning: Duplicat
Uwe Doering wrote:
>Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
>> Uwe Doering wrote:
>>>Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
>I think there's something in one of the included makefiles that relies
>on a change to make(1) that happened after 5.1-RELEASE. Note that
>
Uwe Doering writes:
> If you haven't already done so, install the port 'cvsup', preferably the
> precompiled package in order to avoid having to install Modula (which
> 'cvsup' is written in).
>
> Then you need an appropriate supfile, '/etc/cvsup-src-5.2' in this
> example, which should
Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
Uwe Doering wrote:
Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
I think there's something in one of the included makefiles that relies
on a change to make(1) that happened after 5.1-RELEASE. Note that
only the most recent release is supported by th
More information included at the end of this message which may be of
interest.
Jeff
- Forwarded message from Jeff Penn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jeff Penn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: portsdb: Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry
Forgot to copy list.
- Forwarded message from Jeff Penn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jeff Penn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: portsdb: Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:36:57 +
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 a
I asked:
>Uwe Doering wrote:
[...]
>>If you have the OS sources installed you could selectively upgrade the
>>source files of make(1) via cvsup(1) and just install it. No need to
>>upgrade the whole OS only because make(1) got an additional command line
>>option. We recently did this fo
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:32:15PM +, Jeff Penn wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:28:32AM +, Robert Woolley wrote:
> >> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jeff Penn wrote:
> >>
> >>> My ports system is in a bit of a mess. The problems first surfaced
> >>> after
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:28:32AM +, Robert Woolley wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jeff Penn wrote:
>>
>>> My ports system is in a bit of a mess. The problems first surfaced
>>> after last weeks 'cvsup; portsdb -uU'. This weeks cvsup did not
>>> improve
Uwe Doering wrote:
>Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
>> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:44:45AM +0100, Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
>>>
>>Since I have this same problem I ran 'make describe' and here's the
>>result:
>>
>>-
>>===> devel/s
Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:44:45AM +0100, Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
Since I have this same problem I ran 'make describe' and here's the
result:
-
===> devel/sparc-rtems-gdb
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel.
*** Er
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:50:44AM +0100, Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
> >> Sorry, I should have mentioned that. I'm running 5.1-Release.
> >
> >I think there's something in one of the included makefiles that relies
> >on a change to make(1) that happened after 5.1-RELEASE. Note that
> >only the most
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:44:45AM +0100, Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
>
>> > > Since I have this same problem I ran 'make describe' and here's the
>> > > result:
>> > >
>> > > -
>> > > ===> devel/sparc-rtems-gdb
>> > > *** Error code 1
>> > >
>>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:44:45AM +0100, Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
> > > Since I have this same problem I ran 'make describe' and here's the
> > > result:
> > >
> > > -
> > > ===> devel/sparc-rtems-gdb
> > > *** Error code 1
> > >
> > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel.
> > > *** Error code 1
Kris wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:57:18AM +0100, Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:28:32AM +, Robert Woolley wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jeff Penn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > My ports system is in a bit of a mess. The problems first
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:57:18AM +0100, Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:28:32AM +, Robert Woolley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jeff Penn wrote:
> > >
> > > > My ports system is in a bit of a mess. The problems first surfaced
> > > > after l
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:28:32AM +, Robert Woolley wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jeff Penn wrote:
> >
> > > My ports system is in a bit of a mess. The problems first surfaced
> > > after last weeks 'cvsup; portsdb -uU'. This weeks cvsup did not
> > > improve the si
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:28:32AM +, Robert Woolley wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jeff Penn wrote:
>
> > My ports system is in a bit of a mess. The problems first surfaced
> > after last weeks 'cvsup; portsdb -uU'. This weeks cvsup did not
> > improve the situation:
>
> I don't have a solu
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jeff Penn wrote:
> My ports system is in a bit of a mess. The problems first surfaced
> after last weeks 'cvsup; portsdb -uU'. This weeks cvsup did not
> improve the situation:
I don't have a solution, but I'm getting just the same problem with
portsdb -uU; and it happened
tent --
> dependency list incomplete
> make_index: atk-1.4.1_2: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/glib20
> cut
> make_index: gnopernicus-0.7.1_1: no entry for /usr/ports/x11/libgnome
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: *** Error code 1
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry:
> Don
make_index: gnopernicus-0.7.1_1: no entry for /usr/ports/x11/libgnome
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: *** Error code 1
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry:
Done.
done
[Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 15 port
entries found /usr/sup/INDEX:1:Port info line must consist of 10 fields.
/usr/sup/INDEX
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:44:42PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> Hello Marc,
> Thanks for that pointer, explains some, then again raises other
> questions for me.
>
> Namely, (not complaining here) why would a new dir be created with
> nothing in it, and included in cvs?
It's the first st
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:15:34PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> This continues to fail (twice now since last night). Am I in the middle
> of some change?
Yes..apparently there are problems with empty port categories and some
of the bsd.port.mk targets. These will go away once ports are
repo-co
Hello Marc,
Thanks for that pointer, explains some, then again raises other
questions for me.
Namely, (not complaining here) why would a new dir be created with
nothing in it, and included in cvs? At the moment, (after trying 3
geographically different cvsup servers) this inclusion breaks m
29 matches
Mail list logo
