Hello,
Am 27.08.2010 05:48, schrieb Rocky Borg:
> On 8/26/2010 8:39 PM, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
>> I have changed this in 192.168.0.0/24, but the mistake is the same.
>> Aug 27 05:38:02 silviosiefke postfix/lmtp[50471]: 059D2147C96:
>> to=, relay=none, delay=3.3,
>> delays=3.3/0.03/0/0, dsn=4
On 8/26/2010 5:36 PM, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
-o smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts=127.0.0.0/8
That's probably the problem. It needs to be the ip of the jail. A jail
maps localhost addresses like 127.0.0.1 to the jail's address. So when
you specify network blocks in access restrictions,
Hello,
i have installed DSPAM in a Jail together with Apache. I do it so
because i want use the webinterface.
Before Postfix send message to the socket /tmp/dspam.sock and that was.
But now it goes not with the jail. I read some Howtos in Internet and i
want it now so realize.
Postfix take the
J. Johnston wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone knew of a good howto, or some tips for
> filtering spam using dspam in a setup where virtual users (various
> domains) are stored in LDAP. Currently we hand off email to dspam in
> the filter stage and dspam hands it ba
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone knew of a good howto, or some tips for
filtering spam using dspam in a setup where virtual users (various
domains) are stored in LDAP. Currently we hand off email to dspam in the
filter stage and dspam hands it back into postfix as lmtp, the problem
with this
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:28:08AM +0200, Oliver Peter wrote:
> ...
> Serious:
> I had a little problem with dbmail and pgsql:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg11640.html
>
> I haven't tried the new version yet.
I would like to add:
Today I updated dbmail from 2.2.4 to 2.2.5.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:35:26AM +0100, Feargal Reilly wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:28:08 +0200
> Oliver Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think one main 'problem' with dbmail will be that if your db
> > crashes or stops working EVERYTHING is lost. You don't have
> > these problems
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:56:45AM +0300, Bazy wrote:
> Oliver Peter wrote:
> ...
> I'm using it with MySQL, my database is only 900MB with 15000 mails and
> it works fine.
>
> How did you integrate clamav with postfix?
Clamav doesn't talk to postfix directly - Amavisd-new will call
Clamav. Dunn
!!
Thanking you...
You should also consider that DSPAM, fully trained, can grow very
large. I use a single username for a dozen email boxes, and the
database is 3.5GB. Though you can trim it by dropping tokens that
aren't as accurate, or aren't as frequently used, it could still b
Oliver Peter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:21:49PM +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was wondering if anybody on this list has successfully implemented the
>> following setup on a FreeBSD machine?
>>
>> Postfix + Amavisd
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:28:08 +0200
Oliver Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think one main 'problem' with dbmail will be that if your db
> crashes or stops working EVERYTHING is lost. You don't have
> these problems in this dimension with a filesystem based
> mailsystem. Primarily you will h
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:22:34AM +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
> Oliver Peter wrote:
> ...
> >On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:21:49PM +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
> >I would like to switch back to a filesystem based e-mail backend
> >(maybe dovecot) - feels better to me. Furthermore I think that
Oliver Peter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:21:49PM +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if anybody on this list has successfully implemented the
following setup on a FreeBSD machine?
Postfix + Amavisd-new + Clamav + DSpam + DBmail (PostgreSQL)
Can I use the following
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:21:49PM +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering if anybody on this list has successfully implemented the
> following setup on a FreeBSD machine?
>
> Postfix + Amavisd-new + Clamav + DSpam + DBmail (PostgreSQL)
>
&
Hi All,
I was wondering if anybody on this list has successfully implemented the
following setup on a FreeBSD machine?
Postfix + Amavisd-new + Clamav + DSpam + DBmail (PostgreSQL)
Can I use the following diagram for this?
Postfix --> Amavisd-new --> Clamav --> Amavisd-new
HI all
I'm having some difficulty with getting courier to work with dspam. I have
the courier local delivery agent configured to be:
DEFAULTDELIVERY="| /usr/local/bin/dspam --deliver=innocent --user
\$USER"
And I have dspam configured to use cou
Olga Zenkova schrieb:
I use sendmail with full log and see how sendmail
(configured with dspam with verbose debug) begins to
speak with itself... (sendmail creates replyes - new
processes - new letters with dspam debug data). Can't
understand at all why dspam doesn't write its debug
i
the following mail chain
-> Internet
|
`-> my Postfix MTA
| ^
| |
`-> ClamAV -ยด
|
`-> DSPAM
|
`-> Cyrus
As you can see my ClamAV virus scanner re-injects
Maybe you did setup a mail delivery loop by accident.
How did you configure the TrustedDeliveryAgent variable
in /usr/local/etc/dspam.conf?
For example did you setup TrustedDeliveryAgent to deliver
to the cyrus deliver agent or to procmail etc.?
Olga Zenkova schrieb:
Trying to configure dspam
Trying to configure dspam-3.2.6 with sendmail
8.12.11/8.12.11. Is this portion for sendmail.mc
correct (according to docs):
define(`LOCAL_MAILER_PATH', `/usr/local/bin/dspam')
define(`LOCAL_MAILER_ARGS', `dspam
"--deliver=innocent" --user $u -d %u')
because when I
did you select another DB backend (e.g. PostgreSQL
or SQLite)?
Olga Zenkova schrieb:
Hi!
Can't compile dspam-3.2.6 on FreeBSD-4.10. I mark
option "MYSQL50" in the options window and then get:
"You can use one and only one database back-end at
once
Hi!
Can't compile dspam-3.2.6 on FreeBSD-4.10. I mark
option "MYSQL50" in the options window and then get:
"You can use one and only one database back-end at
once". Why?
Thanks,
Olga
__
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favor
Hello,
I am using DSPAM 3.3-DEVEL but i guess DSPAM 2.10
works the same way regarding your question.
If you compiled DSPAM with the opt-out option
the user needs to place a .nodspam file in his
home directory if he wants to *not* use DSPAM.
Try some googeling to get some more details.
Olga Zenkova
Olga Zenkova wrote:
Hi!
I use dspam-2.10.3. Is it possible to use it not for
all users of FreeBSD system?
This is the wrong mailing list for this type of question, since it
doesn't really relate to bsd, so much as your MTA/LDA.
Regardless, yes, it is possible, in any number of ways. Wh
Hi!
I use dspam-2.10.3. Is it possible to use it not for
all users of FreeBSD system?
Thanks,
Olga
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
On our FreeBSD 5.2.1 box, I have postfix-2.1.5 running with
amavisd-new-2.2.0 and Spamassassin-3.0. All works well and thinking of
incorporating dspam. This postfix server serves as a transport only, no
local user other than admin users. Does anyone have this type of setup
going and possibly some
dspam keeps its database in root-owned files in /usr/local/etc/dspam,
so you must run it as root or use suid.
I use spamprobe, a very similar spamfilter (also based on John Grahams
ideas in A plan for spam), but it stores its database under the users
home-directory, which will give you no
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 22:15:22 -0400
"Reed L. O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone here use dspam? I posted to the dspam maillist but apparen;ty
> noone is lurking there today.
Just haven't got the time to reply.
>
> FreeBSD 5.2.1
> maildrop 1.
Anyone here use dspam? I posted to the dspam maillist but apparen;ty
noone is lurking there today.
FreeBSD 5.2.1
maildrop 1.6.3
dspam 2.10.6
I had maildrop delivering fine. Then I built dspam from the ports and
modified postfix main.cf
to read:
mailbox_command = /usr/local/bin/dspam --user
29 matches
Mail list logo
