ok this is the bit that worries me
That looks perfectly normal, since .museum is a TLD and doesn't have an A
record. Try about.museum, which has these records in the TLD's zone file:
about.museum.86400 IN NS nic.frd.se.
about.museum.86400 IN NS n
On 19 April 2010 16:06, John R. Levine wrote:
> I think watch i really need to do is find a root ns that is already serving
>> signed records then limit djb to that, and then i can do some testing. My
>> gut feeling is that it will be ok, but its no where near 90% let alone
>> 100%
>> which is wh
I also use djbdns and don't expect any particular problems, since you
don't get EDNS responses if you don't make EDNS queries.
There's a one-line patch I can probably dig up which makes dnscache
accept oversized responses. Dunno if it would help, but it's unlikely
to hurt.
R's,
John
I think watch i really need to do is find a root ns that is already serving
signed records then limit djb to that, and then i can do some testing. My
gut feeling is that it will be ok, but its no where near 90% let alone 100%
which is why im nervous. PR nightmare if it does go wrong
The roots al
On 19 April 2010 15:56, John Levine wrote:
> I also use djbdns and don't expect any particular problems, since you
> don't get EDNS responses if you don't make EDNS queries.
>
> There's a one-line patch I can probably dig up which makes dnscache
> accept oversized responses. Dunno if it would he
On 19 April 2010 13:06, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 19/04/2010 12:12, krad wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not strictly a freebsd question this but I'm feeling jittery about this
> as I
> > cant afford it to go wrong.
> >
> > As you are probably aware the root zones are going to be signed soon. I
> run
>
On 19/04/2010 12:12, krad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not strictly a freebsd question this but I'm feeling jittery about this as I
> cant afford it to go wrong.
>
> As you are probably aware the root zones are going to be signed soon. I run
> a number of heavily used dns caches (~ 600-900 queries / sec) runn
Hi,
Not strictly a freebsd question this but I'm feeling jittery about this as I
cant afford it to go wrong.
As you are probably aware the root zones are going to be signed soon. I run
a number of heavily used dns caches (~ 600-900 queries / sec) running djb
dnscache. From what I can see dnscach
