Hi guyz, I'd like to thank all of you. I somehow find the error, there're
three errors actually, first, the machine in 192.168.1 network was not using
my bsd box as gateway (duh! Thankz Ian), second, I had a error in rc.conf,
it had a letter where it was not supposed to have, and third, the pf was
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Alaor Barroso de Carvalho Neto wrote:
> 2007/12/12, Ian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Should be 'defaultrouter', but then it's a route to an apparent local
> > router, whereas your em0 appears to be your public internet connection?
> Yes, it's default router, like I said
2007/12/12, Ian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Should be 'defaultrouter', but then it's a route to an apparent local
> router, whereas your em0 appears to be your public internet connection?
Yes, it's default router, like I said I was not in my work then I wrote by
myself this lines, like I didn'
Re-copying the various contributors ..
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:00:56 -0200
"Alaor Barroso de Carvalho Neto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/12/11, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > out of curiosity, are you pinging from the 4-interfaced-connected BSD
> > box, or some other workstati
2007/12/11, Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Summing up, your local networks should be able to communicate accross
> the BSD box once you have gateway_enable="YES", you do not need NAT for
> that to work. If it doesn't work, then your firewall may be blocking.
>
> For access to the Internet fro
Alaor Barroso de Carvalho Neto wrote:
defaultroute="192.168.1.80"
hostname="tiger.administrativo.unedmacae.cefetcampos.br"
gateway_enable="YES"
ifconfig_em0="inet XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX netmask 255.255.255.227"
ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.1.244 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_xl1="inet 192.168.2.90 netm
2007/12/11, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> out of curiosity, are you pinging from the 4-interfaced-connected BSD
> box, or some other workstation that is trying to use the BSD box as its
> gateway?
>From a workstation that is trying to use BSD box as its gateway and have the
ip of the BSD
Add
gateway_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf.
Make sure your other systems use the freebsd box in question as their
default route.
make sure your firewall, if you have one, is passing the traffic
between the two networks.
Use pf or some other means to nat outbound traffic.
HTH
On Dec 11,
Alaor Barroso de Carvalho Neto wrote:
Yes Chris, but I already have the routes, when I do netstat -r they are
there but I still unable to ping from one network to another. I did read
this section in the handbook but it's not working. I'll paste my netstat -r
output in a while.
Could you post y
Alaor Barroso de Carvalho Neto wrote:
Guyz,
here's my netstat-r output:
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 192.168.1.80 UGS 0 4 xl0
10.10/16 link#4 UC 0 0 xl2
localhost localhost UH 0 0 lo0
192.168.1 link#2 UC 0 0 xl0
zion.administrativ 00:00:54:19:
Guyz,
here's my netstat-r output:
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 192.168.1.80 UGS 0 4 xl0
10.10/16 link#4 UC 0 0 xl2
localhost localhost UH 0 0 lo0
192.168.1 link#2 UC 0 0 xl0
zion.administrativ 00:00:54:19:e7:9a UHLW 1 16 xl0 1151
192.168.1.80 00
2007/12/11, Chris Haulmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It sounds like you are wanting a router to function between two
> different
> subnets.
>
> Take a reading under 29.2.5 at this link:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-routin
> g.html
>
> Chris
Yes Chris, but I a
Hello Alaor:
>
> Guyz, that's my doubt, if I have two separated networks, and a freebsd
> connected in the two of them, I'm supposed to be able to ping to a
> machine
> in 10.10.0 network from a machine in 192.168.1 network, for example,
> byonly
> setting gateway_enable="YES"?
> I know private
Guyz, that's my doubt, if I have two separated networks, and a freebsd
connected in the two of them, I'm supposed to be able to ping to a machine
in 10.10.0 network from a machine in 192.168.1 network, for example, byonly
setting gateway_enable="YES"?
I know private networks are for private use, bu
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 15:29:29 Alaor Barroso de Carvalho Neto wrote:
> Hi guyz, it's me again. I think I don't know what I'm doing, so I ask
> for help. I have three private networks(192.168.1, 10.10.0, 192.168.2)
> and a link to the external world 200.212.X, what I want to do is that my
> Fr
Alaor Barroso de Carvalho Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi guyz, it's me
again. I think I don't know what I'm doing, so I ask for
help. I have three private networks(192.168.1, 10.10.0, 192.168.2) and a
link to the external world 200.212.X, what I want to do is that my FreeBSD
connect all the n
Hi guyz, it's me again. I think I don't know what I'm doing, so I ask for
help. I have three private networks(192.168.1, 10.10.0, 192.168.2) and a
link to the external world 200.212.X, what I want to do is that my FreeBSD
connect all the networks to the external world and the 192.168.1 to the
10.10
17 matches
Mail list logo
