> > I have a strange situation: 2 machines, 9.1 p4, on the first
> machine,
> > graphicslibfpx build with the stock compiler:
> >
> > $ make
> > ===> Fetching all distfiles requir
From olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th Mon Jul 1 12:12:08 2013
> I have a strange situation: 2 machines, 9.1 p4, on the first
machine,
> graphicslibfpx build with the stock compiler:
>
> $ make
> ===> Fetc
Thank you Anto,
> I have a strange situation: 2 machines, 9.1 p4, on the first machine,
> graphicslibfpx build with the stock compiler:
>
> $ make
> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libfpx-1.3.1.1 for building
> ===> Extra
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 15:36:46 +0700 (ICT)
From: Olivier Nicole
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: What compiler is used to build a port
Hi,
I have a strange situation: 2 machines, 9.1 p4, on the first machine,
graphicslibfpx build
Hi,
I have a strange situation: 2 machines, 9.1 p4, on the first machine,
graphicslibfpx build with the stock compiler:
$ make
===> Fetching all distfiles required by libfpx-1.3.1.1 for building
===> Extracting for libfpx-1.3.1.1
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for libfpx-1.3.1-1.tar.xz.
===&g
d extern declaration of '_mm_mul_ps'
resample_sse.h:49: warning: implicit declaration of function '_mm_loadu_ps'
the final complaint from portupgrade was
! multimedia/gstreamer-plugins (gstreamer-plugins-0.10.35_1,3)
(compiler error)
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 28 1
Jeff Hamann написал:
I've built and installed the gcc46 compiler(s) - need gfortran - and I can't
seem to find the correct documentation on how to update /etc/make.conf for
including the gfortran46.
This is what mine currently looks like:
$ cat make.conf
# added by use.perl 2012-0
I've built and installed the gcc46 compiler(s) - need gfortran - and I can't
seem to find the correct documentation on how to update /etc/make.conf for
including the gfortran46.
This is what mine currently looks like:
$ cat make.conf
# added by use.perl 2012-06-07 03:03:21
PERL_VERS
On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:45 PM, kalth...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Is there a way to determine whether a FreeBSD-system was compiled with gcc or
> clang?
> I thought of some libs or so that might significantly differ.
It's fairly easy to determine whether assembly code was compiled with gcc or
clang
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 04:49:38PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
>
> If Java is broken, then you know FreeBSD was compiled with clang...
It's probably more accurate to say "If Java is not broken, it's almost
certainly built with GCC. If it's broken, it could go either way."
(No offense to the
$ # one example
$ gcc -Wall -o hello_world.gcc hello_world.c
$ clang -Wall -o hello_world.clang hello_world.c
$ cmp hello_world.gcc hello_world.clang
hello_world.gcc hello_world.clang differ: char 25, line 1
this does suggest that if you know gcc and clang are the only 2 options for
compilation on a
On 03/13/12 06:49, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
If Java is broken, then you know FreeBSD was compiled with clang...
I wouldn't say that is categorical.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to determine whether a FreeBSD-system was compiled with gcc
or clang?
I thought of
If Java is broken, then you know FreeBSD was compiled with clang...
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to determine whether a FreeBSD-system was compiled with gcc
> or clang?
> I thought of some libs or so that might significantly differ.
>
> Regards,
> kaltheat
>
>
Hi,
Is there a way to determine whether a FreeBSD-system was compiled with gcc or
clang?
I thought of some libs or so that might significantly differ.
Regards,
kaltheat
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
o.o: hello.c /usr/include/stdio.h /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h \
/usr/include/sys/_null.h /usr/include/sys/_types.h \
/usr/include/machine/_types.h
No need for this sort of construct to be gcc specific.
> /usr/src/tools/test/dtrace/Makefile
> c++ -o $@ $< -lpthread
Not sure about thi
a quick search revealed following usages:
FreeBSD abaton.Haakh.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Feb 29
13:49:36 CET 2012 t...@abaton.haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ABATON i386
ah@abaton:~$ find /usr/src/ -name Makefile\* -exec egrep
'^[[:blank:]]+[gc+]{2,3}[[:blank:]]+..' {} \; -p
Sorry for crossposting but since no one on hackers@ seems to be
interested...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:30:35 +0200 (EET)
From: Vladimir Kushnir
To: hack...@freebsd.org
Subject: Base compiler and amdfam10 - anybody/anything?
Hi,
Are there any attempts
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:40:41 +0200, Yordan Petrov wrote:
> Hi
> How could I compile some cgi files for FreeBSD
Depending on the source's programming language, you'd
have to use the corresponding compiler. For interpreted
CGI files, the web server needs to be configured
accordingl
Hi
How could I compile some cgi files for FreeBSD
Is there any online tool ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd
Dear ALL,
The subject says it all. I'm trying to push out of my box every ounce of
performance, perhaps even with (yet experimental) path64 compiler. So my
question is as simple as that: what is the precise spell to put in
make.comf to get (while not disrupting the ports infrastru
em to me is that, FreeBSD 8.2's GCC 4.2 is the
only one that marked to work for ARM, either in the distribution or
in the port tree.
So, who should I complain to?
Chances are slim that -STABLE's compiler gets updated to my
liking. I have no way of knowing right now that the compilers
in the
On 01/23/2011 17:07, Mark Johnston wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 08:00:52PM -0600, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Good Day,
I have seen this for some time when building ports and was wondering
how it was done. GCC when compiling and linking certain programs,
ebook for example, emits messages i
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 08:00:52PM -0600, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> Good Day,
>
> I have seen this for some time when building ports and was wondering
> how it was done. GCC when compiling and linking certain programs,
> ebook for example, emits messages in various colors. How is that
> done?
On 01/22/2011 22:22, Robert Bonomi wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Jan 22 20:10:21 2011
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:00:52 -0600
From: "Michael D. Norwick"
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Colorized compiler/linker messages
Good Day,
I have seen this for
On Sat 22 Jan 2011 at 18:00:52 PST Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Good Day,
I have seen this for some time when building ports and was wondering how
it was done. GCC when compiling and linking certain programs, ebook for
example, emits messages in various colors. How is that done? Where
does on
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Jan 22 20:10:21 2011
> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:00:52 -0600
> From: "Michael D. Norwick"
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Colorized compiler/linker messages
>
> Good Day,
>
> I have seen this for
Good Day,
I have seen this for some time when building ports and was wondering how
it was done. GCC when compiling and linking certain programs, ebook for
example, emits messages in various colors. How is that done? Where
does one find what the various colors are supposed to signify? Or, i
I did already, the whole software is built up by those printf's.
>
> The problem boiled down to be some problem in the UNIX time routines. I
> use localtime(3), time(3) and a strftime(3) and strptime(3).
>
> I use a 'wikipedia'-algorithm converting the actual t
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:05 AM, O. Hartmann <
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Hello.
> Well, the only other architectures I have access to are Linux boxes.
>
> clang ist a very nice compiler since its syntax checking is formidable. But
> its code is slow a
directed to www.oracle.com <http://www.oracle.com> owned pages ) .
Personally I tried GCC compilers , but I found that they are very
unreliable . Now I am using Sun Studio compilers in OpenSolaris and
Linux , and never GCC compilers .Â
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Â
Hell
oint. I will check this again and look
forward for a cleaner solution. But isn't this a 'bug'?
I'll try the BETA of the new FreeBSD PathScale compiler if I get some.
Well, I'll report ...
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@free
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Andrew Brampton
> wrote:
> On 11 September 2010 10:28, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Sirs,
> >
> > you see me a kind of desperate. I wrote my own a small piece of software
> in
> > C, calculating the orbit and position of astronomical objects, astroids,
> in
On 11 September 2010 10:28, O. Hartmann
wrote:
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> you see me a kind of desperate. I wrote my own a small piece of software in
> C, calculating the orbit and position of astronomical objects, astroids, in
> a heliocentric coordinate system from Keplerian orbital elements. So far.
>
Dear Sirs,
you see me a kind of desperate. I wrote my own a small piece of
software in C, calculating the orbit and position of astronomical
objects, astroids, in a heliocentric coordinate system from Keplerian
orbital elements. So far. The software calculates the set of points of
an ellipse
Thanks Mark/kitsana for your help.
Its working for me now.
Thanks,
Akash.
From: Mark Tinguely
To: CyberLeo Kitsana
Cc: akash kumar
Sent: Thu, 17 June, 2010 1:21:53 AM
Subject: Re: compiler flag -Werror
CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 08:02
to ask:
1, how to make cross compile chain with crosstool-0.xx or crosstool-NG.
2, did anyone sucessfully build the cross compiler from x86+redhat to
i386+freebsd ? I have seen that John Blair try to build the same complier, has
you done it?
If you know how to do that, please tell
le"
>
> I noticed that the compiler flags -Werror is invoked default with my
> compiler.
> I want to remove this flag because all the warning as taken as errors due to
> which my compilation stops.
>
> Can you please help me how/where to remove this flag.
I have run
Hi all,
I am working on building a freebsd kernel for mips. As part of this i built
cross tool chain for mips from my host machine(i386).
After that i was building my kernel using make buildkernel KERNCONF="configfile"
I noticed that the compiler flags -Werror is invoked defau
I have installed mingw32 from ports:-
mingw32-gcc-4.4.0_1,1
mingw32-binutils-2.20,1
mingw32-bin-msvcrt-r3.18.a3.14
OS:-
FreeBSD xi.home 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0
Running:-
%mingw32-gcc dummy.c
appears to execute without problems, producing a.exe
Running the alternative:-
%/usr/local/min
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:16:50PM +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> Is this a
>> a) PEBKAC
>
> Maybe. I don't know how many ports have actually been tested with gcc 4.6. I'm
> guessing the ports build cluster us
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:16:50PM +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Is this a
> a) PEBKAC
Maybe. I don't know how many ports have actually been tested with gcc 4.6. I'm
guessing the ports build cluster uses the base system compiler or the required
version.
> b) freeBSD ports er
Is this a
a) PEBKAC
b) freeBSD ports error
c) ffmpeg problem
d) compiler problem (as the error seems to be saying)
gcc46 -DHAVE_AV_CONFIG_H -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-I. -I"/dta/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg/work/ffmpeg-0.5.2" -pipe -mssse3
-mtune=native -O3 -ffast-math -
--- El jue, 29/4/10, Brian A. Seklecki (NOC)
escribió:
> De: Brian A. Seklecki (NOC)
> Asunto: Re: Bacula 5.0 compiler error (crypto.c)
> Para: "Efren Bravo"
> CC: "freeBSD"
> Fecha: jueves, 29 de abril, 2010 07:50
> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 09:48 -0400,
> Br
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 09:48 -0400, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote:
> On 4/26/2010 9:05 AM, Efren Bravo wrote:
> > I've OpenSSL 1.0.0 installed and ports up2date.
> >
> > My server is on production, so, What do you think I should do in my case?
> >
>
> Okay yea you'll need 5.0.1 and a copy of K&
On 4/26/2010 9:05 AM, Efren Bravo wrote:
I've OpenSSL 1.0.0 installed and ports up2date.
My server is on production, so, What do you think I should do in my case?
Okay yea you'll need 5.0.1 and a copy of K&R or Stevens` APUE to help
hold you down. [1]
~BAS
1. Down under water, until the t
> De: Brian A. Seklecki (NOC)
> Asunto: Re: Bacula 5.0 compiler error (crypto.c)
> Para: "Efren Bravo"
> CC: "freeBSD"
> Fecha: sábado, 24 de abril, 2010 09:57
>
> > crypto.c: In function 'ASN1_OCTET_STRING*
> openssl_cert_keyid(X509*
> crypto.c: In function 'ASN1_OCTET_STRING* openssl_cert_keyid(X509*)':
> crypto.c:333: error: invalid conversion from 'const X509V3_EXT_METHOD*' to
> 'X509V3_EXT_METHOD*'
> crypto.c: In function 'CRYPTO_SESSION* crypto_session_new(crypto_cipher_t,
> alist*)':
What's your "uname -a" look like?
Hi there,
I'm trying to install bacula server from /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server and
make install aborts with the message:
===> Building for bacula-server-5.0.0
==>Entering directory /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server/work/bacula-5.0.0/src
==>Entering directory
/usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-s
# reserved for user applications.
#
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" && ${CC} != "icc"
CFLAGS+=-mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 \
-mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2
INLINE_LIMIT?= 8000
.endif
Trying to override the default comp
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 23:26:20 +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
>>See the section "3.17.14 Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options" in the gcc
>>Info manual. It contains a full list of the supported CPU-TYPE values
>>for the -mtune=CPU-TYPE option. The -march=CPU-TYPE option accepts the
>>same CPU types:
>>
>>
[r...@meilk /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/AARON]# make
CC='cc' make -f ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/Makefile
MAKESRCPATH=../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/AARON
cc -O2 -pipe -march=i686 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse -O3 -nostdinc
-I
On 28 February 2010 07:38, Aaron Lewis wrote:
> Hi,
> I gonna recompile kernel for my core2 CPU , so i'd like to pass some flags
> to gcc.
> Kinds of "-march=core2" , i tried to modify /etc/make.conf
> e.g CFLAGS += -march=core2 -O20 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse
> But it fails .. bad arch
>See the section "3.17.14 Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options" in the gcc
>Info manual. It contains a full list of the supported CPU-TYPE values
>for the -mtune=CPU-TYPE option. The -march=CPU-TYPE option accepts the
>same CPU types:
>
>`-march=CPU-TYPE'
> Generate instructions for the m
t;> doesn't know about core2,
>> use 'native' if you must.
>>
>>
>>> And is that useful to let gcc select cpu specified asm code ?
>>
>> Only for some userland stuff like openssl.
>
> Really ? It's bad to use custom flags to com
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:38:45 +0800, Aaron Lewis
wrote:
> Hi,
>I gonna recompile kernel for my core2 CPU , so i'd like to pass some
> flags to gcc.
>Kinds of "-march=core2" , i tried to modify /etc/make.conf
>e.gCFLAGS += -march=core2 -O20 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse
>But it fails
James Phillips wrote:
I laughed at your question because I remember reading somewhere that using aggressive optimization options is a good way to find compiler bugs. I think that extends of optimizations for "new" CPU architectures as well.
I also heard kernel code avoids MMX instru
> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:37:27 +0800
> From: Aaron Lewis
> Subject: Re: Compiler Flags problem with core2 CPU
> To: Paul B Mahol
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <4b8a7fa7.1070...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> fo
On Sunday 28 February 2010 15:31:55 Jerry wrote:
> I am attempting to redo a Gateway GT5220 PC. The CPU is recognized as:
>
> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ (2009.16-MHz 686-class
> CPU)
>
> Now, would it be advantageous to set the CPU type in the
> '/etc/make.conf' and poss
I am attempting to redo a Gateway GT5220 PC. The CPU is recognized as:
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ (2009.16-MHz 686-class CPU)
Now, would it be advantageous to set the CPU type in the
'/etc/make.conf' and possibly '/etc/src.conf' files.
According to the "/usr/share/exampl
Do not top post.
On 2/28/10, Aaron Lewis wrote:
> Really ? It's bad to use custom flags to compile kernel , why do you
> think so ?
> I'd like to know more about this : )
Use google.
>
> So setting optimize compiler flags is only useful for userland stuff ?
>
> Pa
Really ? It's bad to use custom flags to compile kernel , why do you
think so ?
I'd like to know more about this : )
So setting optimize compiler flags is only useful for userland stuff ?
Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 2/28/10, Aaron Lewis wrote:
Hi,
I gonna recompile kernel for my
On 2/28/10, Aaron Lewis wrote:
> Hi,
> I gonna recompile kernel for my core2 CPU , so i'd like to pass some
> flags to gcc.
> Kinds of "-march=core2" , i tried to modify /etc/make.conf
>
> e.gCFLAGS += -march=core2 -O20 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse
> But it fails .. bad arch switch
Hi,
I gonna recompile kernel for my core2 CPU , so i'd like to pass some
flags to gcc.
Kinds of "-march=core2" , i tried to modify /etc/make.conf
e.gCFLAGS += -march=core2 -O20 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse
But it fails .. bad arch switch , core2 cpu is not supported ?
And is
I am trying to build a crosscompiler (gcc-4.1.2, binutils-2.15, freebsd-8.0)
with target as x86_64-freebsd and host as i686-linux. Everything builds
successfully but compiler-assist libraries (libgcc_s, libstdc++, etc.) are
Linux library, not a FreeBSD one.
$ file gcc-4.1.2/x86_64-freebsd8.0/lib
uot; doesn't solve the issue :-/
> >
> > In file included from item.h:2199,
> > from mysql_priv.h:589,
> > from ha_berkeley.cc:53:
> > item_geofunc.h:78: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction: 4
>
> Ok, there are two m
99,
> from mysql_priv.h:589,
> from ha_berkeley.cc:53:
> item_geofunc.h:78: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction: 4
Ok, there are two more possibilities:
a) Your hardware has problems (try http://www.memtest86.com/)
b) Your compiler was itself compi
from ha_berkeley.cc:53:
item_geofunc.h:78: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction: 4
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:45:40 +0100, Gilles
wrote:
>How should I tell gcc to compile for either a PIII processor, or just
>plain i386?
BTW, here are the CFLAGS-related lines MySQL Server's Makefile:
.if defined(WITH_LINUXTHREADS)
CFLAGS+=-D__USE_UNIX98 -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE
CFLAGS+=
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:32:46 -0900, Mel
wrote:
>If you have none in /etc/make.conf that's a good start.
>If it still fails, then make sure BUILD_OPTIMIZED is unset.
>Also comment any CPUTYPE variables in /etc/make.conf.
Thanks again. I'm not really a developper, and don't know quite how to
solve
On Monday 16 February 2009 05:46:01 Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:12:59 +0100, Ivan Voras
>
> wrote:
> >If you have any CFLAGS set (the most common are those for CPU
> >optimizations), disable them and try again.
>
> Thanks for the tip. Do you know which value I should set for this
> swit
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:12:59 +0100, Ivan Voras
wrote:
>If you have any CFLAGS set (the most common are those for CPU
>optimizations), disable them and try again.
Thanks for the tip. Do you know which value I should set for this
switch, if at all?
# dmesg | grep -i CPU
CPU: Intel Pentium III (994
Gilles wrote:
> Hello
>
> I updated the Ports collection on this 6.3 host, but it fails
> compiling MySQL Server 5.1:
>
> ===
> In file included from item.h:2428,
> from mysql_priv.h:749,
> from sql_profile.cc:32:
> item_cmp
Hello
I updated the Ports collection on this 6.3 host, but it fails
compiling MySQL Server 5.1:
===
In file included from item.h:2428,
from mysql_priv.h:749,
from sql_profile.cc:32:
item_cmpfunc.h:1301: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction: 4
Please
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:30:11 -0500
"V. M. Tame-Reyes" wrote:
>
> Hello FreeBSD community,
>
> I had a friend download all the files in freeBSD ports site
> (the official one) so i have a large collection of .tbz files
> but i don't seem to be able to find a
)
cd /usr/ports/lang/g96
make
make test
make install
V. M. Tame-Reyes wrote:
Hello FreeBSD community,
I had a friend download all the files in freeBSD ports site
(the official one) so i have a large collection of .tbz files
but i don't seem to be able to find a correct fortran 77
com
Hello FreeBSD community,
I had a friend download all the files in freeBSD ports site
(the official one) so i have a large collection of .tbz files
but i don't seem to be able to find a correct fortran 77
compiler, i already installed c compiler, but calling g77
wouldn't work.
Any h
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 18:48:39 Xavier Otazu wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:31:10 +0100 Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From that error message I'd say you probably need to populate
>> /usr/local/i386-linux/include with glibc and linux kernel headers.
>
> How can I populate it
Xavier Otazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks a lot for this link. Now I see that I need to use the
> cross-gcc compiler.
I've never done it; I just looked it up.
I'm sure there's more information in the archives of the mailing lists,
and you can always try to
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:31:10 +0100
Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From that error message I'd say you probably need to populate
> /usr/local/i386-linux/include with glibc and linux kernel headers.
How can I populate it with them? Manually installing them in this
directory? May be th
On Monday 24 November 2008 18:19:23 Xavier Otazu wrote:
> When building, I get the following error message:
>
> /usr/ports/devel/cross-gcc/work/gcc-4.2.3/host-i386-portbld-freebsd7.1/gcc/xgcc
> -B/usr/ports/devel/cross-gcc/work/gcc-4.2.3/host-i386-portbld-freebsd7.1/gcc/
> -B/usr/local/i386-linux/
Lowell,
Thanks a lot for this link. Now I see that I need to use the
cross-gcc compiler.
I am using Matlab inside the linux emulator, and I nedd to create some
"mex" files from matlab. In order to create these mes files, matlab
needs access to a gcc compiler that produces linux el
Xavier Otazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to compile a C++ code to be executed within the linux
> emulator.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/linux-xdev
--
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
Hello,
I would like to compile a C++ code to be executed within the linux
emulator.
I tried to install the cross-gcc port, but when building I always receive the
same
compilation error related to gthreads.
I use the following options when compiling the cross-gcc port:
make TGTARCH=i386 TGTABI
_PORT=gnash-0.8.2_2 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=0.8.2_2 make
** Fix the problem and try again.
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! graphics/gnash (gnash-0.8.2_2)(new compiler error)
===
What do I need to do to get this accomplished? I a
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> please force update qmake4 and qt4-corelib ports:
>
> # portmaster devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
> # portupgrade -f devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
>
I have forced packages one by one today.
Thanks for help and updating UPDATING file.
--
View this
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> please force update qmake4 and qt4-corelib ports:
>
> # portmaster devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
> # portupgrade -f devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
>
Still cannot upgrade qt4-corelib without qt4-moc>=4.4.1.
--
View this message in context:
http://
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> please force update qmake4 and qt4-corelib ports:
>
> # portmaster devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
> # portupgrade -f devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
>
> - - Martin
>
>
I have already tried upgrading corelib (===> qt4-corelib-4.4.1 depends on
pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 04:51:17AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
>
> This is the Qt/X11 Open Source Edition.
>
>
>The specified system/compiler is not supported:
>
>
> /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-x11-opensource-s
/usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.4.1/mkspecs/ is empty
directory.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/qt4-moc-4.4.1-not-compiling-%28compiler-system-not-supported%29-tp18829459p18829813.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.co
g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon Jul 28 17:27:04 CEST 2008
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/qt4-moc-4.4.1-not
This is the Qt/X11 Open Source Edition.
The specified system/compiler is not supported:
/usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.4.1/mkspecs/freebsd-g++
Please see the README file for a complete list.
===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
In RE
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do
I have to do devious things to eventually find it?
# cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc42
# make install clean
--
Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** [ Busy Ex
What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do I have
to do devious things to eventually find it?
Are you Catholic and single? Click Here.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3oGxtfMGTyKQeDjl1IylH
the cross compiler i'm looking to build is one to produce i386
compatable system v elf executables for freebsd. the default gcc
installed with freebsd 6.1 produces i386 compatible freebsd elf
executables, not system v.
i've also found that i'm apparently building gcc improper
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:47:42PM -0400, Wyatt Neal wrote:
> greetings,
>
> i've been running with a freebsd 6.1 system for a few days and i'm
> having some oddities when trying to build a cross compiler on the
> system.
You don't say _what_ kind of cross-compile
In the last episode (Jul 29), Wyatt Neal said:
> i've been running with a freebsd 6.1 system for a few days and i'm
> having some oddities when trying to build a cross compiler on the
> system.
>
> the first issue that shows is:
>
> In file included from a
greetings,
i've been running with a freebsd 6.1 system for a few days and i'm
having some oddities when trying to build a cross compiler on the
system.
the first issue that shows is:
In file included from archive.c:132:
sysdep.h:173:21: libintl.h: No such file or directory
this come
IR("/usr/lib");
Some relevant portions from the compiler spec file:
*linker:
collect2
*startfile_prefix_spec:
/usr/lib/
*fbsd_dynamic_linker:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
*link_command:
%{!fsyntax-only:%{!c:%{!M:%{!MM:%{!E:%{!S:%(linker) %l %{pie:-pie} %X %{o*}
%{A} %{d} %{e*} %{m} %{N} %{n
e you used. I would put some
printf's in the code and see what and when that variable gets
set to
in actual running code.
-Derek
I understand it is waiting at a breakpoint in gdb. What I meant was
put printf's in your code and run the program and look at the
output. You can use f
1 - 100 of 301 matches
Mail list logo
