Re: Cacti -vs- mrtg

2006-11-10 Thread Don Munyak
Also check out CactiEZ . its a distribution package of sorts that will load a complete system on a spare box. Basically a quick and dirty for those not wanting to take all the steps of installing an OS first and then the packages and plug-ins. http://cactiusers.org/ __

Re: Cacti -vs- mrtg

2006-11-07 Thread Jeff Mohler
Thats cool..I dont mind the plug. :) I want to build a flexable performance analyzer for netapp boxes on some very critical data..that I can customise per customer if I have to, down to a 10-15sec window. I'll have to check out the other tools..heck..I cant get a stock cacti install to make a g

Re: Cacti -vs- mrtg

2006-11-07 Thread Howard Jones
Jeff Mohler wrote: I can use MRTG, and have MRTG do what I want it to do. Id like to try cacti, but..am I alone in finding that it's a PITA? Im not trying to be negative, just looking for a reality check. I like the simplicity of mrtg, but I like the "go back in time" of cacti to view perform

Re: Cacti -vs- mrtg

2006-11-07 Thread Jonathan McKeown
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 09:48, Jeff Mohler wrote: > I can use MRTG, and have MRTG do what I want it to do. > > Id like to try cacti, but..am I alone in finding that it's a PITA? > > Im not trying to be negative, just looking for a reality check. > > I like the simplicity of mrtg, but I like the

Cacti -vs- mrtg

2006-11-06 Thread Jeff Mohler
I can use MRTG, and have MRTG do what I want it to do. Id like to try cacti, but..am I alone in finding that it's a PITA? Im not trying to be negative, just looking for a reality check. I like the simplicity of mrtg, but I like the "go back in time" of cacti to view performance data. If its