Matt Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The business-as-usual practice would be to not run -Stable, but rather
> run a -Release. -Stable, although more stable than -Current, should not
> be run in business-production, although my hunch is that many small
> environments do.
IMO, the best practic
List, please correct me if I am wrong:
The business-as-usual practice would be to not run -Stable, but rather
run a -Release. -Stable, although more stable than -Current, should not
be run in business-production, although my hunch is that many small
environments do.
If you are running -Stable, t
Is it a best practice to include debuging options in a -STABLE tree
kernel?
I have read the following article which suggests that a business-as-
usual practice should be to include debugging options.
>http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/03/21/Big_Scary_Daemons.html?page=1
The kernel develope
