-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, December 08, 2006 11:20:23 +0300 Abdullah Al-Marrie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> KEY='8a0283ceb2478ad5bec8e611dfc6299b'
> TOKEN='oc0f+hmaYdsqXkcC+UqfrUKB+a1JiYX8pJHB6oYPIEY='
> VERSION=5.0
Thanks, fixed ...
>
>
> On 12/7/06, Marc
KEY='8a0283ceb2478ad5bec8e611dfc6299b'
TOKEN='oc0f+hmaYdsqXkcC+UqfrUKB+a1JiYX8pJHB6oYPIEY='
VERSION=5.0
On 12/7/06, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can you email me the output of /var/db/bsdstats?
- --On Thursday, December 07, 2006 13
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 04:09 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Numbers are up from November, which is what we hope for ... not drastically,
> but 7.5% isn't shabby either:
>
> Last MonthThis Month % Change
> Total Systems 2085 2254 7.50%
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can you email me the output of /var/db/bsdstats?
- --On Thursday, December 07, 2006 13:38:28 +0300 Abdullah Al-Marrie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using it in my laptop, but I don't see my country State of Qatar
> in http://www.bsdst
Hello,
I'm using it in my laptop, but I don't see my country State of Qatar
in http://www.bsdstats.org/countries.php
Is it supported?
Thank you,
-Abdullah
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
On 7/12/2006 12:26 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
Ahem, could it be someone from (this time) Australia is gaming the
system? We've gone up from 425 a little earlier to (just now) 555
FreeBSD systems, and while we're never sorry to be beating the Yanks,
especially at their own game, I doubt that it's fair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, December 07, 2006 00:26:19 +1100 Ian Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice tonight that all of the 'none' devices reported there all seem
> also to be display adapters. On my Thinkpad T23 (not yet reporting) I
> see the pci
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, 09:50:20 -0400 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> - --On Wednesday, December 06, 2006 00:31:49 +1100 Ian Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > > report_devices sen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, December 06, 2006 00:31:49 +1100 Ian Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > report_devices sends the output of pciconf -l | grep -v none (active
> device
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
> report_devices sends the output of pciconf -l | grep -v none (active devices)
Marc, I've wondered for a while why you're excluding 'none' devices, eg
on my Compaq Armada 1500c (recent 5.5-STABLE) 'pciconf -lv' includes
[EM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, December 05, 2006 13:35:05 +0100 Svein Halvor Halvorsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> report_devices sends the output of pciconf -l | grep -v none (active devices)
>
> http://bsdstats.org/freebsd/devices.ph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, December 05, 2006 15:20:53 +0300 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:13:53 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> report_devices sends the output of pciconf -l | grep -v none (active devices)
>
> Wow, th
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> report_devices sends the output of pciconf -l | grep -v none (active devices)
http://bsdstats.org/freebsd/devices.php?show=class suggests that
there are >27,000 bridge devices in use, but according to the main
report on the front page, only ~3,000 FreeBSD systems overall.
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:13:53 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> report_devices sends the output of pciconf -l | grep -v none (active devices)
Wow, thus you throw out the info about hardware not used/don't have
drivers. Are you really not interested at the latter?
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, December 04, 2006 11:09:31 -0500 Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hal wrote:
Since the point of this is to be run monthly, out of periodic
monthly, the 1st
of the month is when all hosts should be 'renewing' their inf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, December 04, 2006 22:50:26 +0300 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ...but you seem to pay most attention to those hosts reported at the
> first day.
>
> Thanks all for your tips, I'll report those hosts.
I'm trying to lo
On 5/12/2006 2:47 AM, hal wrote:
On Dec 3, 2006, at 9:43 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:09:18 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Since the point of this is to be run monthly, out of periodic
monthly, the 1st
of the month is when all hosts should be 'renewing' their information
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:46:08 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> --On Monday, December 04, 2006 20:46:49 +0300 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> Add something like that (real code at least) to the init/rc file used on
> >> the
> >> diskless station, to be run after all mounts are
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> --On Monday, December 04, 2006 20:46:49 +0300 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
Add something like that (real code at least) to the init/rc file used on
the
diskless station, to be run after all mounts are up?
>>> As I said I'm af
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, December 04, 2006 20:46:49 +0300 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Add something like that (real code at least) to the init/rc file used on the
>> diskless station, to be run after all mounts are up?
>
> As I said I'm a
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:46:49 +0300
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I said I'm afraid those machines may give some destabilization to
> bsdstats results when the First of month is a holiday/weekend. So I'm
> not sure if it's a good thing to report them to bsdstats.org. What do
> you
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:28:15 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> --On Monday, December 04, 2006 02:07:08 +0300 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 17:05:04 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> >> If its diskless, will each reboot end up reporting as a whole new host
hal wrote:
Since the point of this is to be run monthly, out of periodic
monthly, the 1st
of the month is when all hosts should be 'renewing' their information
Cool project. Just added my main machine to it.
Is there any way for me to see what it's really sending? Looks like it
sends a bun
On Dec 3, 2006, at 9:43 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:09:18 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Since the point of this is to be run monthly, out of periodic
monthly, the 1st
of the month is when all hosts should be 'renewing' their
information ...
I have some diskless work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following numbers reflect the change in reporting numbers between October
and November 2006. These include both those that reported *on* the 1st of the
month, as well as those changes over the course of the month.
Since the point of this is to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, December 04, 2006 02:07:08 +0300 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 17:05:04 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> If its diskless, will each reboot end up reporting as a whole new host each
>> time, or is
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 17:05:04 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> If its diskless, will each reboot end up reporting as a whole new host each
> time, or is there some way of saving that /var/db/bsdstats across reboots?
We use memory mounted /var. :-(
Ok, let's only our servers do the reporting.
WBR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Sunday, December 03, 2006 19:43:41 +0300 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:09:18 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> Since the point of this is to be run monthly, out of periodic monthly, the
>> 1st of the
On 12/3/06, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Numbers are up from November, which is what we hope for ... not drastically,
but 7.5% isn't shabby either:
For those wishing to see more formal stats, or more detail, please check out
http:
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:09:18 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Since the point of this is to be run monthly, out of periodic monthly, the
> 1st
> of the month is when all hosts should be 'renewing' their information ...
I have some diskless workstations running FreeBSD. Sure users are not
suppose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following numbers reflect those systems that reported in on the 1st day of
the month of December, compared against the 1st day of the previous month.
Since the point of this is to be run monthly, out of periodic monthly, the 1st
of the month is
31 matches
Mail list logo
