On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:53:28 -0700 (PDT), borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- Joshua Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have been having been having some issues with BIND
> > that have been
> > driving me up the wall. I believe I may have located
> > the problem. I
> > believe I had both
borg writes:
> Correction for what I posted earlier:
> Bind now resides in /usr/ports/dns
> It's still hardcoded in my memory the location on my
> old 4.x server which was /usr/ports/net :)
Are you aware of "/usr/ports/MOVED"?
Robert Huff
___
--- borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a very common confusion. Usually after
> installing Bind9 from the ports "named -v" gives you
> the 8.x version. A fast and dirty method to override
> the old Bind8 with Bind9 tools and file:
> cd /usr/ports/net/bind9
Correction for what I posted earli
--- Joshua Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been having been having some issues with BIND
> that have been
> driving me up the wall. I believe I may have located
> the problem. I
> believe I had both BIND8 and BIND9 installed on the
> same system. So I am
> reinstalling from the ports col
Joshua Lewis wrote:
I have been having been having some issues with BIND that have been
driving me up the wall. I believe I may have located the problem. I
believe I had both BIND8 and BIND9 installed on the same system. So I am
reinstalling from the ports collection and overwriting BIND8 completel
I have been having been having some issues with BIND that have been
driving me up the wall. I believe I may have located the problem. I
believe I had both BIND8 and BIND9 installed on the same system. So I am
reinstalling from the ports collection and overwriting BIND8 completely.
I wish to avoid t
