On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 23:11:27 +0200, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm running a server on FreeBSD 8.1 STABLE (apache 2.2.16, mysql 5.1.50,
> php 5.3.3) and I server some websites from it, most of them using Joomla or
> Wordpress CMS.
Those are typical (and known)
dy Wodfer wrote:
> > Hi everybody!
> >
> > I'm running a server on FreeBSD 8.1 STABLE (apache 2.2.16, mysql 5.1.50,
>
> To quote front page of http://www.freebsd.org:
> * Production: 9.1
> * Legacy: 8.4
> My net. con. is too slow right now to check t
Hi, Reference:
> From: Andy Wodfer
> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 23:11:27 +0200
Andy Wodfer wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm running a server on FreeBSD 8.1 STABLE (apache 2.2.16, mysql 5.1.50,
To quote front page of http://www.freebsd.org:
* Production: 9.1
Hi everybody!
I'm running a server on FreeBSD 8.1 STABLE (apache 2.2.16, mysql 5.1.50,
php 5.3.3) and I server some websites from it, most of them using Joomla or
Wordpress CMS.
I recently had a security breach where someone used a hole in an older
Joomla version and was able to install
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:17:55 +0100
Chris Rees articulated:
> You need to use ${UNIQUENAME}_SET, and to find the UNIQUENAME you
> need to;
>
> [crees@pegasus]~% cd /usr/ports/www/apache22
> [crees@pegasus]/usr/ports/www/apache22% make -VUNIQUENAME
> apache22
>
> Now we know it's apache22, we can
gt;> > My machines are all identical too, except for parameters related to
>> > $hostname, DNS and passwords.
>> > I mostly used /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf before, then `make config`
>> > and
>> > now I believe I am gonna switch to /etc/make.conf but only
`make config` and
> > now I believe I am gonna switch to /etc/make.conf but only where I must
> > finely customize.
> > One thing has crossed my mind now: What happens with make -DWITH_* in
> this
> > new development of optionsNG?? I have manually built ports that way
>
new development of optionsNG?? I have manually built ports that way before.
> And what about those who want to use portinstall -m WITH_OPTx=1 WITH_OPTy=1,
> etc?
Still works fine for nearly all ports, but just for apache ports there
appears to be subtle problems with the logic since it
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Washington
> wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Thanks for this.
> >
> > Hopefully, you can modify the Wiki to have this information and even
> > examples:)
>
> There are examples on the Wiki page already, but i
;
>> On 16 September 2012 07:19, Odhiambo Washington
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Solmin Vladimir wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi!
>> >> Im using apache 2.2.22_6 with make options in /etc/make.conf
>> >>
>> &
012 07:19, Odhiambo Washington
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Solmin Vladimir wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >> Im using apache 2.2.22_6 with make options in /etc/make.conf
> >>
> >> # apache22
> >> .if ${.CURDIR} == ${PORTSDIR}
On 16 September 2012 07:19, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Solmin Vladimir wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>> Im using apache 2.2.22_6 with make options in /etc/make.conf
>>
>> # apache22
>> .if ${.CURDIR} == ${PORTSDIR}/www/
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Solmin Vladimir wrote:
> Hi!
> Im using apache 2.2.22_6 with make options in /etc/make.conf
>
> # apache22
> .if ${.CURDIR} == ${PORTSDIR}/www/apache22
> WITH_SUEXEC=YES
> SUEXEC_DOCROOT= /www
> SUEXEC_USERDIR
Hi!
Im using apache 2.2.22_6 with make options in /etc/make.conf
# apache22
.if ${.CURDIR} == ${PORTSDIR}/www/apache22
WITH_SUEXEC=YES
SUEXEC_DOCROOT= /www
SUEXEC_USERDIR= /www/*/cgi-bin
SUEXEC_LOGFILE= /var/log/suexec.log
WITH_APACHE_PERF_TUNING=yes
.endif
I've got a webdav setup on apache using svn, and all seems well until I
use openoffice and it comes up with locking issues.
I can mount the webdav drive and use locking to stop the io errors in
openoffice, but it still tells me it is locked and can only be opened
read only. I'
bsd wrote:
>
> Le 21 août 2012 à 04:10, John Levine a écrit :
>
Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue
with the latest.
>>>
>>> Hmmn, that might have been it.
>>>
>>> I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again
>>> without APC.
>>
Le 21 août 2012 à 04:10, John Levine a écrit :
>>> Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with
>>> the
>>> latest.
>>
>> Hmmn, that might have been it.
>>
>> I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again without
>> APC.
>
> Tried it without
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:42 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> Good thought, I just did that. Results:
>>>
>>> php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
>>>
>>> php5.4: fails in random ways
>>>
>>> This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is apparent on FreeBSD
>>> 8.x.
>>> I note that the packa
>> Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with
>> the
>> latest.
>
>Hmmn, that might have been it.
>
>I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again without
>APC.
Tried it without APC, didn't help. We're back to the theory that there's
something
Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with the
latest.
Hmmn, that might have been it.
I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again without
APC.
R's,
John
John R. Levine wrote:
>> Then perhaps you should downgrade to lang/php53 and lang/php53-extensions
>> and compare the results!
>
> Good thought, I just did that. Results:
>
> php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
>
> php5.4: fails in random ways
>
> This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which
Good thought, I just did that. Results:
php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
php5.4: fails in random ways
This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is apparent on FreeBSD 8.x.
I note that the packages for 8.x have gone away on the distribution server,
so I expect they're not regression
Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with
the latest.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubsc
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:02 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> Then perhaps you should downgrade to lang/php53 and lang/php53-extensions
>> and compare the results!
>>
>
> Good thought, I just did that. Results:
>
> php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
>
> php5.4: fails in random ways
>
> This su
On 20 Aug 2012 16:46:13 -
John Levine articulated:
> I have a fully patche amd64 freebsd 8.3 server with apache 2.2 and
> PHP 5.4.5.
>
> In the past day, php scripts have started failing with a variety of
> random errors, they hang, errors claiming that builtins like
> requ
Then perhaps you should downgrade to lang/php53 and lang/php53-extensions
and compare the results!
Good thought, I just did that. Results:
php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
php5.4: fails in random ways
This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is apparent on FreeBSD 8.x.
I note t
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:18 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> I've done all the usual voodoo repair: I have rebuilt apache, php, and
>>> all the php modules from source, and rebooted, and it didn't help.
>>>
>>
> Did you also rebuilt lang/php5-extensions for
I've done all the usual voodoo repair: I have rebuilt apache, php, and
all the php modules from source, and rebooted, and it didn't help.
Did you also rebuilt lang/php5-extensions for the modules you need?
Uh, yes, I said that I did.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary P
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, John Levine wrote:
> I have a fully patche amd64 freebsd 8.3 server with apache 2.2 and PHP
> 5.4.5.
>
> In the past day, php scripts have started failing with a variety of random
> errors,
> they hang, errors claiming that builtins like requ
I have a fully patche amd64 freebsd 8.3 server with apache 2.2 and PHP 5.4.5.
In the past day, php scripts have started failing with a variety of random
errors,
they hang, errors claiming that builtins like require_once() are not found, and
other stuff. I don't see any pattern. I also
On Aug 9, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
>> Hmm
>> I added that and rebooted the jail host system. However, the setting in
>> sysctl security.jail.sysvipc_al
Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
Hmm
I added that and rebooted the jail host system. However, the setting in sysctl
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed is still 0 after the reboot
# sysctl -a | gr
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
Hmm
I added that and rebooted the jail host system. However, the setting in sysctl
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed is still 0 after the reboot
# sysctl -a | grep sysvipc
security.jail.param.all
jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi. I'll try this again.
I run systems using FreeBSD 9.0
FreeBSD utah.XXXcom 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #1: Wed Mar 21 15:22:14
MDT 2012 chad@underhill:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNDERHILL-XEN amd64
and on those systems run a bunch of jails. I have Apache 2.2 built and running
i
Hi
I run systems using FreeBSD 9.0
FreeBSD utah.XXXcom 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #1: Wed Mar 21 15:22:14
MDT 2012 chad@underhill:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNDERHILL-XEN amd64
and on those systems run a bunch of jails. I have Apache 2.2 built and running
in the jail in question, and
e on this list has switched from Apache to nginx.
>
> If you have, what has your experience been like? Was the change
> relatively easy? (I'm not intimidated by technical details. I've been
> running FreeBSD on these servers for about 12 years now.) Was the
> performan
wondering if anyone
on this list has switched from Apache to nginx.
>
>
> it depends of your needs.
This is a fantastic statement (I'm being serious, not facetious), because
it really does.
For specific purposes - serving static content with few bells and whistles,
dedicated PHP
I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million
hits/mo). We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start from
scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering if anyone
on this list has switched from Apache to nginx.
it
I have to start
from scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering
if anyone on this list has switched from Apache to nginx.
If you have, what has your experience been like? Was the change
relatively easy? (I'm not intimidated by technical details. I've been
ru
I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million
hits/mo). We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start from
scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering if anyone
on this list has switched from Apache to nginx.
If you
>From time to time, I notice in a top output, that a huge number of httpd
> daemons are being started, making the load rapidly increase to levels of
> 5, 10, 15, ... and very slow interactive respons ...
>
> Stopping apache makes the load rapidly decrease to a normal level.
>
y 7 2012 08:45:58)
>
>> From time to time, I notice in a top output, that a huge number of httpd
> daemons are being started, making the load rapidly increase to levels of
> 5, 10, 15, ... and very slow interactive respons ...
>
> Stopping apache makes the load rapidly decrea
hat a huge number of httpd
daemons are being started, making the load rapidly increase to levels of
5, 10, 15, ... and very slow interactive respons ...
Stopping apache makes the load rapidly decrease to a normal level.
I noticed at the console, at stopping apache, several messages such as
Jun 14
Rebuilding and upgrading to apache openoffice on my main desktop fails
because the procedure consumes all my 17 gbs of available /usr space,
which still is not enough apparently. The build routine says 11gb is
more than enough. Libreoffice will not build on this machine for some
reason so at
On 12/04/2012 14:40, Ian Lord wrote:
>> What are the permissions on /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail ? They should
>> >look like this:
>> >% ls -la /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
>> >-r-xr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 662136 Apr 1 08:38
>> >/usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
> # ls -al /usr/libexec/sendmail/sen
>You should not be changing the ownership and permissions on any of the
>directories used by sendmail(8), or the group membership of any of the
>groups used by sendmail. Not even if you think you know what you are
>doing. This is extremely security sensitive, and getting it wrong means
>at minimu
QUEUE: SYSERR(www): can not write
> >> > to queue directory /var/spool/clientmqueue/ (RunAsGid=0, required=25):
> >> > Permission denied
>
> >> > I found very old threads saying to change the group of apache
> >> > to "smmsp" but
tmqueue/ (RunAsGid=0, required=25):
>> > Permission denied
>> > I found very old threads saying to change the group of apache
>> > to "smmsp" but I doubt it's a good idea.
> No, not "change to", but you can _add_ apache (or whatever is
>
; I found very old threads saying to change the group of apache
> to "smmsp" but I doubt it's a good idea.
No, not "change to", but you can _add_ apache (or whatever is
originating the error) to the smmsp group. Add it to "smmsp:*:25:"
in /etc/group.
See the erro
directory
# ls -al /var/spool/clientmqueue/
drwxrwx--- 2 smmsp smmsp 3 Apr 11 19:01 .
So I saw that only the user and group smmsp could write to this directory. I
presumed the apache user should have access to it so I added "www" to the
"smmsp" directory.
I then got a dif
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Thanks!
--
chs
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.o
On 10/04/2012 08:05, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> I see this error in the error log of apache. It seems to happen
> whenever someone do a GET on certain mp3-files on my server. What does
> this error mean?
It can be due to various different reasons. At a guess, probably thi
I see this error in the error log of apache. It seems to happen
whenever someone do a GET on certain mp3-files on my server. What does
this error mean?
--
chs,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
according to:
http://www.fastcgi.com/mod_fastcgi/docs/mod_fastcgi.html#FastCgiExternalServer
---
Note: Using FastCgiServer within a VirtualHost does not necessarily
limited access to that host. If filename is accessible via other
virtual hosts, they too can leverage the same definition.
---
how
rver.
>
> What am I missing here?
>
You're missing, most likely, an alias to /phpmyadmin/ or similar.
You may want to copy/paste your vhost configuration.
Also, no offense meant, but I think you're being lazy.
>From your question, I can only guess that you hav
Installed Freebsd9.0 along with Apache2.2 ,php5, php5-extensions, perl, and
phpmyadmin
phpmyadmin works fine when i put in the url but if I add a virtual host file
then I get the error can't find phpmyadmin on the server.
What am I missing here?
Thanks__
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Lewis
wrote:
> Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
> the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
> required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
>
I am assuming you want to run
On 1/16/12 1:03 PM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
> Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
> the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
> required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel Lewis
>
Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
Thanks,
Daniel Lewis
561-676-1073
___
freebsd-questions
ight check if thats the issue easily by renaming
> php.ini.. it should run without it. (at least 5.2 would havent tried 5.3)
> if it runs without php.ini then that could be the problem.
> by the way you are restarting apache after the changes right? also
> verify that the modules listed i
and then
> > portinstall and now getting a seg fault when restarting apache22 on this
> > FreeBSD 8.1 server. I narrowed it down to not the php module, but the
> > two ldap modules I have in apache...
> >
> > mail# cat httpd.conf|grep ldap
> > #LoadModule authnz_
gt; FreeBSD 8.1 server. I narrowed it down to not the php module, but the
> two ldap modules I have in apache...
>
> mail# cat httpd.conf|grep ldap
> #LoadModule authnz_ldap_module libexec/apache22/mod_authnz_ldap.so
> #LoadModule ldap_module libexec/apache22/mod_ldap.so
>
> With
have in apache...
mail# cat httpd.conf|grep ldap
#LoadModule authnz_ldap_module libexec/apache22/mod_authnz_ldap.so
#LoadModule ldap_module libexec/apache22/mod_ldap.so
With these two lines commented out, apache restarts without the seg
fault. Tried to force pkg_delete on apache and then
On 04/01/2012 07:31, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
> PS. I will need to convert the mssql data to mysql, is there any good
> program that will convert this? I understand that this question is
> probably inappropriate for this e-mail thread but maybe someone could
> shoot me a quick suggestion.
This is p
this wasn't possible without a program like ChiliASP, but now I heard
rumor that apache might have a plugin to allow it to read ASP. I am
unsure if there is an apache solution, or other solution like
nginx/lighttpd that runs ASP. Any information you guys could provide
would be great.
Sergio Tam wrote:
> 2011/9/20 n dhert :
>> Monday I did a portupgrade
>> apache-2.2.20 < needs updating (index has 2.2.21)
>> There was no problem during the update (and nothing special mentionned in
>> /usr/ports/UPDATING)
>> Today Tues
2011/9/20 Odhiambo Washington
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 21:45, Sergio Tam wrote:
>
>> 2011/9/20 n dhert :
>> > Monday I did a portupgrade
>> > apache-2.2.20 < needs updating (index has
>> 2.2.21)
>> > There
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 21:45, Sergio Tam wrote:
> 2011/9/20 n dhert :
> > Monday I did a portupgrade
> > apache-2.2.20 < needs updating (index has 2.2.21)
> > There was no problem during the update (and nothing special mentionned in
> >
2011/9/20 n dhert :
> Monday I did a portupgrade
> apache-2.2.20 < needs updating (index has 2.2.21)
> There was no problem during the update (and nothing special mentionned in
> /usr/ports/UPDATING)
> Today Tuesday afternoon I did a
> # apachectl
Monday I did a portupgrade
apache-2.2.20 < needs updating (index has 2.2.21)
There was no problem during the update (and nothing special mentionned in
/usr/ports/UPDATING)
Today Tuesday afternoon I did a
# apachectl graceful
Since them, several webpages give problems
t
After I upgraded the 8.2-STABLE to more current code and upgraded all
ports I am unable to connect to svn repository through apache: client
gets this:
Could not authenticate to server: rejected basic challenge.
httpd-errors.log gets messages, see below.
What may be a problem?
Yuri
---httpd
I would guess so, however I have no experience with fcgi on apache, I
only run it with nginx and lighttpd servers.
On 6/29/11 6:04 PM, Grant Peel wrote:
> Should I be using suPHP then instead of the formentioned suexec/mod_fcgid ?
>
> -Grant
>
> -Original Message- From:
Should I be using suPHP then instead of the formentioned suexec/mod_fcgid ?
-Grant
-Original Message-
From: Damien Fleuriot
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:25 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Apache 2.2 + PHP5 + SuExec + (fast-cgi or mod_fcgid)
*fast* cgi , which as
*fast* cgi , which as the name implies, is erm, fast ;)
See, only apache has PHP as a module.
Other web servers such as nginx or lighttpd use a fastcgi process.
This has several advantages:
- you'll no longer see apache exit with (quote) a "signal 11, core
dumped" because of
I am under the impression that suPHP is the better/more secure way of
running PHP with Apache. In addition you don't need suEXEC to do so. Am
I incorrect in these assumptions? What are the benefits of running PHP
as a CGI(if you don't mind me asking) ?
Mark
-Original Message-
F
Hello Everyone,
I am researching how to run PHP as CGI with Apache's Suexec module. Up to
this point we have been using PHP as an Apache mod, but are looking to move
to the more secure solution.
I am not sure this is exactly the right list top post to so if anyone knows
a better one pleas
I'm very sorry! I had vars like WITH_APACHE=foo in /etc/make.conf!
It's ok in ports.
2011/6/27 Pavel Timofeev
> How can I install php-fpm without installing apache?
> Is it possible?
>
> [root@timp /usr/ports/lang/php5]# make showconfig
> ===> The following configu
How can I install php-fpm without installing apache?
Is it possible?
[root@timp /usr/ports/lang/php5]# make showconfig
===> The following configuration options are available for php5-5.3.6_1:
CLI=off "Build CLI version"
CGI=off "Build CGI version"
FP
mach/Apache2/Const.pm
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 25924 Jun 10 17:08
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/mach/Apache2/Const.pm
The only reference to it is in an Apache config include file:
PerlModule "Apache2::Const -compile => ':common'"
I have these ports:
perl-5
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> >> Since rpc.lockd and rpc.statd expect to be able to do IP broadcast
> >> (same goes for rpcbind), I suspect that might be a problem w.r.t.
> >> jails, although I know nothing about how jails work?
> >>
> > Oh, and you can use the "nolock" mount optio
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Rick Macklem wrote:
Since rpc.lockd and rpc.statd expect to be able to do IP broadcast
(same goes for rpcbind), I suspect that might be a problem w.r.t.
jails, although I know nothing about how jails work?
Oh, and you can use the "nolock" mount option to avoid use of
rpc.lo
#x27;special files' of a sort aren't working,
> > for
> > when I try and startup Apache, I get:
> >
> > [Fri Apr 01 19:42:02 2011] [emerg] (65)No route to host: couldn't
> > grab
> > the
> > accept mutex
> >
> > When I try and do
't working,
> for
> when I try and startup Apache, I get:
>
> [Fri Apr 01 19:42:02 2011] [emerg] (65)No route to host: couldn't grab
> the
> accept mutex
>
> When I try and do a 'newaliases', I get:
>
> # newaliases
> postalias: fatal: lock
wo servers ...
ServerA, nfsd on 192.168.1.8
ServerB, nfs client on 192.168.1.7
I have a jail, ServerC, running on 192.168.1.7 ... most operations appear to
work, but it looks like 'special files' of a sort aren't working, for when I
try and startup Apache, I get:
[Fri Apr 01 19:42:02 2
I just setup an nfs mount between two servers ...
ServerA, nfsd on 192.168.1.8
ServerB, nfs client on 192.168.1.7
I have a jail, ServerC, running on 192.168.1.7 ... most operations appear
to work, but it looks like 'special files' of a sort aren't working, for
when I try and
Don't border,
i found the error, nothing to with freebsd. sorry
2011/3/23 n dhert
> Hi,
>
> I did an upgrade from FreeBSD 8.1 to 8.2 today. All OK so far, except for
> Apache (apache-2.2.17_1)
> It wouldn't start.
> /var/log/httpd-error.log
> [Wed Mar 23 13:04:26
Hi,
I did an upgrade from FreeBSD 8.1 to 8.2 today. All OK so far, except for
Apache (apache-2.2.17_1)
It wouldn't start.
/var/log/httpd-error.log
[Wed Mar 23 13:04:26 2011] [error] Server should be SSL-aware but has no
certificate configured [Hint: SSLCertificateFile] ((null):0)
I di
No. Apache Mod_proxy is independent of squid, even natd and ipfw; a reverse
proxy?
Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to put a simple proxy server together, and I have installed
Squid, Sarg and Webmin, all of which are working fine.
When I go into webmin to add a sarg module, I don&
Hi folks,
I'm trying to put a simple proxy server together, and I have installed
Squid, Sarg and Webmin, all of which are working fine.
When I go into webmin to add a sarg module, I don't see it anywhere as
an option.
Is that because I have to install Apache first?
If so, how do I th
Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> i want say its running now perfect. I has search in internet and found
> the follow Howto, and now it run.
>
> http://blog.myprod.net/2010/08/14/apache2-suexec-fastcgi-php-5-3-3-fpm-
cache-opcode-apc/
That is excellent. I had also forgoten all about the sue
Hello,
i want say its running now perfect. I has search in internet and found
the follow Howto, and now it run.
http://blog.myprod.net/2010/08/14/apache2-suexec-fastcgi-php-5-3-3-fpm-cache-opcode-apc/
Regards
Silvio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> i use fastcgi with PHP-FPM on Apache 2.2.17. When i go on Website with
> FastCGI then the page load not complete.
>
> http://mail.silviosiefke.de/fastcgi_apache.png
>
> When i run with FCGID then the page load complete.
>
Hey,
Am 02.03.2011 15:25, schrieb Ivan Voras:
>
> This is not a FreeBSD problem.
Thank u, that i know. But i has think that is a user list, someone can
help me. Because i try since weeks and found not where is the mistake.
> The most likely problem is that your FastCGI configuration handles mor
On 01/03/2011 20:22, Silvio Siefke wrote:
Hello,
i use fastcgi with PHP-FPM on Apache 2.2.17. When i go on Website with
FastCGI then the page load not complete.
http://mail.silviosiefke.de/fastcgi_apache.png
When i run with FCGID then the page load complete.
http://mail.silviosiefke.de
Hello,
i use fastcgi with PHP-FPM on Apache 2.2.17. When i go on Website with
FastCGI then the page load not complete.
http://mail.silviosiefke.de/fastcgi_apache.png
When i run with FCGID then the page load complete.
http://mail.silviosiefke.de/fcgid_apache.png
Has someone a idea what is the
nfigure.
Add LDAP support to the OPTIONS for devel/apr1 by running 'make config'
Rebuild and reinstall devel/apr1
Rebuild and reinstall www/apache22
In general, you need to match up the capabilities from devel/apr1 with
the set of modules you want to enable for www/apace22. So if
I am trying to build apache22 on a fresh 8.1 box from ports. It is
dying right about here:
mod_authnz_ldap.c:41:2: error: #error mod_authnz_ldap requires
APR-util to have LDAP support built in. To fix add --with-ldap to
./configure.
Help! :)
--
Paul Halliday
http://www.pintumbler.org
__
Would any folks with experience in Apache/SSL be willing to
help with a (probably novice) problem off-list?
(My search-fu is inferior: I've found the problem mentioned,
but no solutions.)
Robert Huff
___
fr
Got mod_caucho.so installed. The makefile only refers to Apache 20 while I am
running 22. I changed the path in the Makefile to /usr/ports/www/apache22 and
the compile arg to yes and it installed fine. Will test now.
Cheers,
Andy
---
Mvh/Rgds,
Andreas Wideroe
Den 14. okt. 2010 kl. 21:20
1 - 100 of 2226 matches
Mail list logo
