:19:19 -0500
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> From: jbiq...@icsmx.com
> Subject: Anti virus, anti spam step guide.
>
> Hello all.
>
> I am looking documentation for implementing, the easiest way anti
> virus and anti spam configuration for non tech users and out of
low the instructions.
>
> -Marwan Sultan
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:19:19 -0500
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > From: jbiq...@icsmx.com
> > Subject: Anti virus, anti spam step guide.
> >
> > Hello all.
> >
> > I am loo
.
You can install spamassassin from ports, and follow the instructions.
-Marwan Sultan
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:19:19 -0500
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> From: jbiq...@icsmx.com
> Subject: Anti virus, anti spam step guide.
>
> Hello all.
>
> I am l
used it; but webmin might be good if you want them to
maintain use accounts themselves: /usr/ports/sysutils/webmin
On 8/4/2010 9:19 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello all.
I am looking documentation for implementing, the easiest way anti
virus and anti spam configuration for non tech users and o
On Aug 4, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I am looking documentation for implementing, the easiest way anti virus and
> anti spam configuration for non tech users and out of the box after
> installing FreeBSD (actually using 7.3 Release).
[snip]
Do not
Hello all.
I am looking documentation for implementing, the easiest way anti
virus and anti spam configuration for non tech users and out of the
box after installing FreeBSD (actually using 7.3 Release).
I have been working with it for some years but I am not an expert at
all. I need to help
> And call it a quirk of mine, but I really dislike (server) software with
> a large number of dependencies. That rules out Spam Assassin. But I am
I am not sure what you call dependencies.
SA is written in Perl, using some Perl libraries, so of course you
need these, but on the other hand th
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Richard Coleman wrote:
I am running a mail server using Postfix and Dovecot. I would like to hear
people's recommendation for which port to use to add server side anti-spam.
The problem these days is a richness of choices, so it's hard to know port
which to
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:21:58PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> > Bogofilter works very well, after you've trained it with some spam &
> > ham. You can get a head start by starting from someone else's wordlist.
BTW, I'd be happy to share my wordlist. At ≈12MB it's kinda large though.
> Yes, works
O/H Philip Hallstrom έγραψε:
I am running a mail server using Postfix and Dovecot. I would like
to hear people's recommendation for which port to use to add server
side anti-spam. The problem these days is a richness of choices, so
it's hard to know port which to try.
How you looked
I am running a mail server using Postfix and Dovecot. I would like to hear
people's recommendation for which port to use to add server side anti-spam.
The problem these days is a richness of choices, so it's hard to know port
which to try.
And call it a quirk of mine, but I real
Richard Coleman wrote:
hear people's recommendation for which port to use to add server side
anti-spam. The problem these days is a richness of choices, so it's
I outsourced ours to AppRiver http://www.appriver.com/ It's not in the unix "roll
your own" spirit,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:15:09PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:00:59PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote:
> > I am running a mail server using Postfix and Dovecot. I would like to
> > hear
> > people's recommendation for which port to use to
Richard Coleman escribió:
I am running a mail server using Postfix and Dovecot. I would like to
hear people's recommendation for which port to use to add server side
anti-spam. The problem these days is a richness of choices, so it's
hard to know port which to try.
And call it
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:00:59PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote:
> I am running a mail server using Postfix and Dovecot. I would like to hear
> people's recommendation for which port to use to add server side anti-spam.
> The problem these days is a richness of choices, so it&
Richard Coleman wrote:
I am running a mail server using Postfix and Dovecot. I would like to
hear people's recommendation for which port to use to add server side
anti-spam. The problem these days is a richness of choices, so it's
hard to know port which to try.
And call it a qui
I am running a mail server using Postfix and Dovecot. I would like to
hear people's recommendation for which port to use to add server side
anti-spam. The problem these days is a richness of choices, so it's
hard to know port which to try.
And call it a quirk of mine, but I real
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
Like I said...if it taxes their resources even one tenth of one percent,
I'm for it.
It's not their resources, it's the resources they have stolen from other
people by breaking into
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:01 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: John Levine; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> I would disagree on the
NO. I'm making it sound like greylisting is NOT the world's answer to
stopping spam. It's NOT a miracle cure, it is NOT the last, best hope
for peace.
Sigh. You might want to read the paper "Experiences with Greylisting"
from the 2005 CEAS conference.
It was my original intention to show t
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: John Levine; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
You're making it sound as if greylisti
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:08 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: John Levine; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> You're making
On Apr 30, 2007, at 6:19 AM, cpghost wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 01:16:23AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
The system that would cause problems if it ran
greylisting is not MY system. It's the mailserver owned by the
cellular
company that I am sending to. If they went and installed
g
On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:36 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I don't understand why people are focusing on trying to redesign
the monitoring system I'm using. Don't you have any imagination
at all? The point was that there are legitimate situations where
the delays introduced by greylisting are a pr
>Cellular operators know that their clients expect speedy
>delivery of SMS, including those sent via SMTP.
Actually, in my experience SMTP to SMS gateways can have significant
delays unrelated to greylisting. Travel agencies like Orbitz send out
notices about flight changes and delays via SMTP->S
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Ted, usually I find your posts intelligent and food for thought, but
I almost think you're doing this on purpose now.
No, the problem is you haven't understood the point I was making.
Here's the summary as I understand it.
You're against greylisting because:
a) it'
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:05 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Christopher Hilton; User Questions
Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
Both of those are assumptions your making that are
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 01:16:23AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> The system that would cause problems if it ran
> greylisting is not MY system. It's the mailserver owned by the cellular
> company that I am sending to. If they went and installed greylisting
> it is highly unlikely I could get
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenny Dail
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 8:18 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> > > I'm monitoring system
> -Original Message-
> From: John Levine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 6:31 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> >> Email is not an instant messagi
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 3:40 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Eric Crist; Grant Peel; Christopher Hilton;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:05 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Christopher Hilton; User Questions
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> >
> > Both of those
> > I'm monitoring systems at the ISP I work at. No, it is not life or
> > death
> > if a feed goes down for 3 hours and a bunch of people cannot download
> > their daily freebsd-questions mailing list fix. At least, I don't
> > think
> > so. But they do. And as their money that buys the IS
On Apr 29, 2007, at 4:45 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sam Lawrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:59 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
Email is not an instant
>> Email is not an instant messaging system, no matter how much you want
>> it to be one.
>
>Cell phone companies won't take pages any other way no matter how much you
>want them to.
This might be a good time to learn about outfits like clickatell.com
that provide SMS gateway service. They char
On Apr 29, 2007, at 4:00 AMApr 29, 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If the monitoring system notices something down, I have to know about
it within a few minutes. I cannot wait for the mailserver that
sends the
page out to retry sending the page to the cell carrier's mailserver
in an hour.
Thi
-- Was: Anti Spam
On Apr 28, 2007, at 5:25 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:58 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Christopher Hilton; Grant Peel; Eric Crist;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:01 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Eric Crist; Grant Peel; Christopher Hilton;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Lawrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:59 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
>
> Email is not an instant messaging
-- Was: Anti Spam
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their
mail
to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail
address is
in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server
failur
On Apr 28, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
Hilton
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:45 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: User Questions
Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
Ted
-- Was: Anti Spam
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their
mail
to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail
address is
in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server
failure.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
> Hilton
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:45 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: User Questions
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> Ted Mittelstaed
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:58 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Christopher Hilton; Grant Peel; Eric Crist;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
&
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[snip]
When I scan my maillogs I find that 22% of the hosts that generate a
greylisting entry retry the mail delivery and thus get whitelisted. The
other 78% don't attempt redelivery within the greylisting window.
That's probably par.
However, the reason your putting
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their
mail
to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail address is
in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server failure.
I would be pretty pissed o
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Sean Hilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:05 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; User Questions
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> [snip...]
>
&g
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[snip...]
Greylisting works because many, and I'd like to say most, spam programs
never retry message delivery.
Actually, no. Greylisting works because it delays the spam injector
long enough that the injector will get blacklisted by the time that the
greylist opens t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
> Hilton
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:25 PM
> To: Grant Peel
> Cc: Eric Crist; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
Just my $0.02. Have you considered adding greylisting. I find the
combination of greylisting and Spamassassin with the SA's bayes filter
completely handles my spam problem. On my primary MX I use spamd on
OpenBSD and on my secondary MX I use spamd on FreeBSD. As a very
informal method of measur
>> We are wrestling (as I am sure many are), with spam. Up until now we
>> have been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party
>> Anti-Spam servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the
>> weeks go by.
>>
>> We are considering two hardwar
here because I know there are alot of ISPs
using FreeBSD (including me) and am hoping to get feedback, either
directly
to me or to the list.
We are wrestling (as I am sure many are), with spam. Up until now we have
been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam
servervices that a
itves!
So, first take a very good look to your MTA!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:43 PM
Subject: Anti Spam
Hi all,
I am posting this question here because I know there are alot of ISPs using
FreeBSD (
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Derek Ragona spaketh thusly:
-}
-}If your volume of mail is >5 per day don't use the baracuda. It won't
-}keep up.
I think this greatly depends on the model. I've not used the 200 but it
certainly is a small box. My experience shows the 600 could easily handle
this per
now we have
been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam
servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by.
We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda.
Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is Easyantispam.
>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: Anti Spam
On Apr 20, 2007, at 11:43 AMApr 20, 2007, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
I am posting this question here because I know there are alot of ISPs
using FreeBSD (including me) and am hoping to get feedback, either
directl
Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam servervices
that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by.
We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda.
Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is Easyantispam. Does
anyone out there have
ntil now we have
been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam
servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by.
We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda.
Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is Eas
. Up until now
we have been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd
party Anti-Spam servervices that are getting less and less reliable
as the weeks go by.
We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and
Barracuda. Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely
been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam
servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by.
We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda.
Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is Easyantispam.
Does
rectly to me or
to the list.
We are wrestling (as I am sure many are), with spam. Up until now we have been
employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam servervices
that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by.
We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyan
am. Up until now we
> have been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party
> Anti-Spam servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the
> weeks go by.
Isn't everyone?
> We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda.
> Barracuda is ve
l now we have
> been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam
> servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by.
>
> We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda.
> Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likel
I found this article and it helped alot. I rarely have any spam get through.
Thee are 2 parts to this so maker sure you goto page 3 and scroll to the
bottom of the page for a link to page 2 if you don't want to read this
section
http://www.crn.com/white-box/188701471?pgno=1
--
Darrell
[EMAIL P
ould be glad to explain our setup.
Shane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Peel
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 11:43 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Anti Spam
Hi all,
I am posting this question here because I know there a
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Peel
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 11:43 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Anti Spam
Hi all,
I am posting this question here because I know there are alot of ISPs
using FreeBSD (including me) and am hoping to get feedback, either
directly to me or to the
until now we have
been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam
servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by.
-}
-}We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda.
Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is
using some 3rd party Anti-Spam servervices
that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by.
We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda.
Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is Easyantispam. Does
anyone out there have thought on either or
Angelin Lalev wrote:
My e-mail server is running the latest spamassassin with all of the blacklist enabled and etc.
but I still receive over 20 spam messages a day ("image" spam mostly).
The situation with other users may be worse. That's why I was thinking about some tool that
1. store incomi
Angelin Lalev wrote:
Hi List,
My e-mail server is running the latest spamassassin with all of the blacklist enabled and etc.
but I still receive over 20 spam messages a day ("image" spam mostly).
The situation with other users may be worse. That's why I was thinking about some tool that
On Apr 4, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
What I got caught on was "client," altho from the context,
here ``client'' seems to mean the mail-server-sending-spam.'
In the unix world, my server is the client--unless the
client-server model is different with email
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:09:07PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Apr 03), Gary Kline said:
> > I've been experimenting with greylisting for months. Not sure the
> > regular mail filter installs or not, but the devel version installed
> > just now perfectly.
> >
> > Is there any
In the last episode (Apr 03), Gary Kline said:
> I've been experimenting with greylisting for months. Not sure the
> regular mail filter installs or not, but the devel version installed
> just now perfectly.
>
> Is there any tutorial on this or should I just re-read the man pages
> and other docs
There's some specific plugins that can help with this - see the spamassassin
site - ImageInfo is one.
Also make sure you're running the URI-RBL tests and the SARE and other
rulesets from www.rulesemporium.com.
best place to ask is the spamassassin list !
--
martin
On 4/2/07, Angelin Lalev <[EM
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:49:19PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Apr 03), Angelin Lalev said:
> > My e-mail server is running the latest spamassassin with all of the
> > blacklist enabled and etc. but I still receive over 20 spam messages
> > a day ("image" spam mostly).
> >
> >
Angelin Lalev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My e-mail server is running the latest spamassassin with all of the
> black= list enabled and etc. but I still receive over 20 spam
> messages a day ("image" spam mostly).
how about greylisting? putting something like a greylisting pf/spamd
in front of
In the last episode (Apr 03), Angelin Lalev said:
> My e-mail server is running the latest spamassassin with all of the
> blacklist enabled and etc. but I still receive over 20 spam messages
> a day ("image" spam mostly).
>
> The situation with other users may be worse. That's why I was
> thinkin
[mailed and posted]
On Apr 2, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Angelin Lalev wrote:
Hi List,
My e-mail server is running the latest spamassassin with all of the
blacklist enabled and etc.
but I still receive over 20 spam messages a day ("image" spam mostly).
The situation with other users may be worse. T
On Apr 2, 2007, at 17:08, Kurt Buff wrote:
Do you receive mail from lists such as this one?
Do you receive mail from non-responding mailboxes, such as network
notificationss, etc.?
Do you care about your new correspondents?
If you answer 'yes' to any of these messages, then a Challenge/Respo
Do you receive mail from lists such as this one?
Do you receive mail from non-responding mailboxes, such as network
notificationss, etc.?
Do you care about your new correspondents?
If you answer 'yes' to any of these messages, then a Challenge/Respons
system isn't a good idea for you.
Instead,
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Angelin Lalev wrote:
My e-mail server is running the latest spamassassin with all of the blacklist
enabled and etc.
but I still receive over 20 spam messages a day ("image" spam mostly).
The situation with other users may be worse. That's why I was thinking about
some tool
Hi List,
My e-mail server is running the latest spamassassin with all of the blacklist
enabled and etc.
but I still receive over 20 spam messages a day ("image" spam mostly).
The situation with other users may be worse. That's why I was thinking about
some tool that
1. store incoming em
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Sean Murphy wrote:
I want to add an anti-spam solution to sendmail. I was wondering what
solution you chose for server side anti-spam and how well it works for you.
milter-greylist in combination with clamav-milter, a few select DNSBLs,
and entries in access.db for the
Sean Murphy wrote:
I want to add an anti-spam solution to sendmail. I was wondering what
solution you chose for server side anti-spam and how well it works for
you.
A few months ago I tried amavisd-new in the "Sendmail Dual" configuration
with clamav for antivirus and SpamAssassin f
I want to add an anti-spam solution to sendmail. I was wondering what
solution you chose for server side anti-spam and how well it works for you.
--
Sean Murphy
Network Technician
California Institute of the Arts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:40:28PM -0400, Thomas Farrell wrote:
> First your going to need a licensed version of sometype of
> antivirus application you can always get freeB's but they will eventually
> run out. some of the AV for BSD are panda, kaspersky,. macfee, and Sophos
> & fprot . Both Fpr
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Thomas Farrell wrote:
> cpan mods needed. I am using mailmonitor & sophos sweep works great I can
> block files or file extentions types, block subject content, quarantine
> infected attachments, attempt to clean them. You can go to sophos.com and
> fill out evalutaions for
to
make it scan and filter
> our mails. That works perfectly and so I see no need for mailmonitor at
all.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FreeBSD Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:35 AM
Subject: Anti
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:35:45AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> Any comments on a good anti-spam app that works with sendmail for a mail
> server?
I'd highly recommend MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info) combined
with SpamAssassin (http://www.spamassassin.org) and ClamAv
(http://www
Chris wrote:
Any comments on a good anti-spam app that works with sendmail for a mail
server?
Yes. You can have a look at messagewall its in the ports.
www.messagewall.org
Been using it for the past year now and it's works just fine.
___
[
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 10:35, Chris wrote:
> Any comments on a good anti-spam app that works with sendmail for a mail
> server?
Yeah, try SpamAssassin. I've been using it since January, and have almost
zero SPAM delivered to my inbox now. I think in all that time it has only
ha
Any comments on a good anti-spam app that works with sendmail for a mail
server?
--
Best regards,
Chris
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 09:31:36AM -0500, Brent Bailey wrote:
> Hello,
> Im looking for you thoughts and opinions on Anti -Spam and Anti virus
> solutions for email servers. Im getting ready to implement a email server
> solution for an ISP. Im very use to sendmail as ive been abl
Hello,
Im looking for you thoughts and opinions on Anti -Spam and Anti virus
solutions for email servers. Im getting ready to implement a email server
solution for an ISP. Im very use to sendmail as ive been able to compile
sendmail to do rbl checks and use access.db and procmail filtering and
ntact your ISP and
ask them to for you,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Zonesville
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: anti-spam and mailing lists
My email to freebsd-java is being bounced wit
jected: Access denied
Remote system: dns;mx1.freebsd.org (TCP|167.206.5.69|37826|216.136.204.125|25)
(mx1.FreeBSD.org
ESMTP Postfix [Postfix Rules!])
What anti-spam lists are the mailing lists using? I'd like to know so I can try to get
this
rectified.
Thanks,
-Kurt
__
Use postfix.
--
Regards
Cliff Sarginson
The Netherlands
[ This mail has been checked as virus-free ]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
On 2002-12-31 09:56, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On 31 Dec Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > b) You don't really need to use procmail as the delivery agent of ALL
> >the local users. You can enable procmail on a per-user basis by
> >proper .forward files in their home directories.
>
> Yeah, I've h
On 31 Dec Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-12-30 13:24, dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/procmail')
> a) Why /usr/bin/procmail and not the default path of the procmail port
>installation [/usr/local/bin/procmail]? I use procmail for l
On 2002-12-30 13:24, dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/procmail')
> > >FEATURE(local_procmail,`',`procmail -t -Y -a $h -d $u')
> > >MAILER(procmail)dnl
> > >
> > >Am I right about this or do I put them in submit.mc?
> >
> > Spamprobe doesn't req
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
