Re: Another question about pkgng

2012-12-31 Thread Walter Hurry
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:02:51 +, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote: >>> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote >>> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of

Re: Another question about pkgng

2012-11-24 Thread Krissada Jindanupajit
- Sent via BlackBerry from Thai Citrus -Original Message- From: Walter Hurry Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.orgDate: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:02:51 To: Subject: Re: Another question about pkgng On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 24/11/2012 20

Re: Another question about pkgng

2012-11-24 Thread Walter Hurry
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote: >> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote >> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the >> remote repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against r

Re: Another question about pkgng

2012-11-24 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote: > When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote > repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the remote > repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite. > > That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg upda

Another question about pkgng

2012-11-24 Thread Walter Hurry
When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the remote repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite. That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg update' first? __