On Friday 05 November 2010 22:51:01 Robert Bonomi wrote:
> > From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Nov 5 02:26:31 2010
> > From: Jonathan McKeown
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:27:38 +0200
> > Subject: Glue re
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Nov 5 02:26:31 2010
> From: Jonathan McKeown
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:27:38 +0200
> Subject: Glue records (was Re: ATTN GARY KLINE)
>
> On Friday 05 November 2010 09:28:27 Ian Smith wro
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:32:11AM -0400, Jon Radel wrote:
> On 11/5/10 12:22 AM, kline wrote:
> >
> >i''m using evo to be able to click on. i have fewer ``Fail'' type
> >responses, but do not understand the failure messages. Also, since it
> >has been 9.5 years since I read DNS AND BIND, the jar
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 335, Issue 9, Message: 7
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:27:38 +0200 Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2010 09:28:27 Ian Smith wrote:
> > But you don't always have any control of what parent nameservers do;
> > eg we do DNS for a .com but both NS are in .au
On Friday 05 November 2010 09:28:27 Ian Smith wrote:
> But you don't always have any control of what parent nameservers do;
> eg we do DNS for a .com but both NS are in .au so DNS reports always
> whinge about lack of glue
They should be whingeing about lack of clue (their own) unless I'm horribly
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 335, Issue 8, Message: 29
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:32:11 -0400 Jon Radel wrote:
> On 11/5/10 12:22 AM, kline wrote:
[..]
> > It is time to get this stuff arrow-straight, so hoping that someone
> > on-list can clue me in.
[..]
> > http://www.dnscog.com/report/tho
On 11/5/10 12:22 AM, kline wrote:
i''m using evo to be able to click on. i have fewer ``Fail'' type
responses, but do not understand the failure messages. Also, since it
has been 9.5 years since I read DNS AND BIND, the jargon is lost. What
does "glue" means? and how should I resolve?
It is
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:08 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> 2010-11-04 06:59, Gary Kline:
> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> >>
> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
> >>> From: Gary Kline
> >>> Subject: Re: is there a utility...?
> >>>
> >>
> >> *please* fix th
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:52:17AM -0400, Jon Radel wrote:
> On 11/4/10 1:29 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> >On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman
> >wrote:
> >>He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago
> >>and nothing's been fixed.
> >Seems to be fine from here:
> >
> >% ns
2010-11-04 06:59, Gary Kline:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
From: Gary Kline
Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
*please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable.
There is no IP address for the primary
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 06:29:38AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> > He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago
> > and nothing's been fixed.
>
> Seems to be fine from here:
>
> % nslookup -type=any thought.org
> Server:
Seee below for typing from deadbbs.com.
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
> > From: Gary Kline
> > Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
> >
>
> *please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable.
>
> The
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
> > From: Gary Kline
> > Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
> >
>
> *please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable.
>
> There is no IP address for the primary nameserv
On 11/4/10 1:29 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago
and nothing's been fixed.
Seems to be fine from here:
% nslookup -type=any thought.org
Server: 192.168.100.1
Address:192.16
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago
> and nothing's been fixed.
Seems to be fine from here:
% nslookup -type=any thought.org
Server: 192.168.100.1
Address:192.168.100.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago and nothing's been
fixed.
On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
>> From: Gary Kline
>> Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
>>
>
> *please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you ar
> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
> From: Gary Kline
> Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
>
*please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable.
There is no IP address for the primary nameserver, 'ns1.thought.org'
The secondary nameserver 'ns2.everydns.net' times out on
On 9/27/05, Bill Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Mon, 26 Sep 2005 it looks like Kris Kennaway composed:
>
> > You are blocking mail from me again:
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host ns1.thought.org[216.231.43.140] said: 550 5.0.0
> >No SPAM (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
> >
> > Thi
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:50:30PM -0700, Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
> At Mon, 26 Sep 2005 it looks like Kris Kennaway composed:
>
> >You are blocking mail from me again:
> >
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host ns1.thought.org[216.231.43.140] said: 550
> >5.0.0
> > No SPAM (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
At Mon, 26 Sep 2005 it looks like Kris Kennaway composed:
You are blocking mail from me again:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host ns1.thought.org[216.231.43.140] said: 550 5.0.0
No SPAM (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
This has been an issue in the past..unless you can get it under
control I'll just
You are blocking mail from me again:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host ns1.thought.org[216.231.43.140] said: 550 5.0.0
No SPAM (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
This has been an issue in the past..unless you can get it under
control I'll just stop bothering to read your emails, in case I'm
tempted to t
21 matches
Mail list logo
