On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:27:32AM +, Stephen Allen wrote:
> Roland Smith wrote:
>> Than they should run i386. You only _need_ (as opposed to "nice to play
>> with" :-) amd64 if you run out of address space on a typical workload.
>
> What if you have more than 3Gb of RAM to play with... would
Roland Smith wrote:
Than they should run i386. You only _need_ (as opposed to "nice to play
with" :-) amd64 if you run out of address space on a typical workload.
What if you have more than 3Gb of RAM to play with... would you have to
use amd64 then?
Steve :)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 09:39:24AM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have seen that recently on the mailing list there has been a discussion on
> running i386 FreeBSD binaries under an amd64 system. As far as I have been
> able to read there does not appear to be anyway of achieving this exc
Hi,
I have seen that recently on the mailing list there has been a discussion on
running i386 FreeBSD binaries under an amd64 system. As far as I have been
able to read there does not appear to be anyway of achieving this except
though either a chroot/jail or vitalization. I think this is a shor
