Paul Kraus writes:
> That was exactly the problem. I knew it was in the
> installation configuration *somewhere*, but I just could not find
> it. Thanks.
>
> Should I report this as a bug in the postfix port ?
No need. Looks like sahil@ has already fixed it.
Be well.
___
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
> Paul Kraus writes:
>
>> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd
>> problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem
>> (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make
>> install' fai
Paul Kraus writes:
> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd
> problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem
> (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make
> install' fails when trying to install the startup script to
> /usr/etc/rc.
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:16:20 -0400, Paul Kraus wrote:
> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd problem. I use
> the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem (it worked fine
> with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make install' fails when
> trying to install the star
When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd problem. I use
the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem (it worked fine with
9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make install' fails when trying to install
the startup script to /usr/etc/rc.d instead of /etc/rc.d. It
