Re: 7.0 and fsck question

2008-03-02 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Matthew Seaman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Two possibilities: >> >> i) The root partition wasn't marked dirty at the time your system > [...] > > The root partition was mounted rw. > > I neglected to mention the box is head

Re: 7.0 and fsck question

2008-03-02 Thread Walker
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two possibilities: > > i) The root partition wasn't marked dirty at the time your system [...] The root partition was mounted rw. I neglected to mention the box is headless, so I can only see what is logged. I'm guessi

Re: 7.0 and fsck question

2008-03-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
Walker wrote: > Today I lost power and my FreeBSD 7.0-R server came up with all > partitions "not properly dismounted". I was watching the fsck reports > to syslog and noticed there wasn't one for the root partition. Why is > this? No syslogd running at the point when fsck runs on /? Two possib

7.0 and fsck question

2008-03-01 Thread Walker
Today I lost power and my FreeBSD 7.0-R server came up with all partitions "not properly dismounted". I was watching the fsck reports to syslog and noticed there wasn't one for the root partition. Why is this? No syslogd running at the point when fsck runs on /? _