On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 04:23:04PM -0700, Eric Wolfe wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to upgrade a system using 4.7 to 5.4 or whatever, but,
> I'm having problems finding 4.7 anywhere on the net to do the upgrade
> (since it asks for it). Any suggestions?
If "it" (what?) is asking for 4.7, you're probab
On 8/8/05, Eric Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to upgrade a system using 4.7 to 5.4 or whatever, but,
> I'm having problems finding 4.7 anywhere on the net to do the upgrade
> (since it asks for it). Any suggestions?
> --Eric Wolfe
4.7 to 5.4 is a big jump, It may be better, in
Eric Wolfe wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade a system using 4.7 to 5.4 or whatever, but,
I'm having problems finding 4.7 anywhere on the net to do the upgrade
(since it asks for it). Any suggestions?
--Eric Wolfe
You don't need it. Just upgrade your source tree via cvsup and make
buildworld
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade a system using 4.7 to 5.4 or whatever, but,
I'm having problems finding 4.7 anywhere on the net to do the upgrade
(since it asks for it). Any suggestions?
--Eric Wolfe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
Khanh Cao Van <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My custom use freeBSD 4.7 release and ask me to install JDK1.4 on it .
> But when I use ports to compile JDK , the system show me a message :
Please keep in mind that 4.7 was superseded more than two years ago,
and the whole 4.x branch wa
My custom use freeBSD 4.7 release and ask me to install JDK1.4 on it .
But when I use ports to compile JDK , the system show me a message :
You must have a version of FreeBSD later than 4.7-STABLE February 2003
or 5-CURRENT February 2003 to compile and use JDK 1.4.2.
So I have to update my 4.7
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:57:44 -0500 Jeronimo wrote:
>
> Does anyone know where 4.7 released iso can be obtained from???
> I checked the main ftp site at freebsd.org and only 4.8 was available...
>
> Any hints would be appreciated. Thanks.
The FreeBSD mirror sites database is probably what you're
--- Jeronimo Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
>
> Does anyone know where 4.7 released iso can be obtained
> from???
> I checked the main ftp site at freebsd.org and only 4.8 was
> available...
>
> Any hints would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
To...Jeronimo Romero
What's the reason that you
Does anyone know where 4.7 released iso can be obtained from???
I checked the main ftp site at freebsd.org and only 4.8 was available...
Any hints would be appreciated. Thanks.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
> Hello Freebsd Team.
>
> I installed a 4.7RELEASE FreeBSD based machine to run a software
> that is designed for that version of FreeBSD. My machine crashed
> and now I need to reinstall the system with the same version, but
> unfortunately, I lost my 4.7RELEASE CD, and now looking on your
> websi
Hello Freebsd Team.
I installed a 4.7RELEASE FreeBSD based machine to run a software that is
designed for that version of FreeBSD. My machine crashed and now I need
to reinstall the system with the same version, but unfortunately, I lost
my 4.7RELEASE CD, and now looking on your website for the IS
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:36:33AM -0800, Peter Leftwich wrote:
> > Hello fellow BSD'ers! Happy holidays.
> > I had 4.7-RELEASE on my box and then I accidentally deleted a file
> > as root (I think it was /usr/lib/ld-e
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:36:33AM -0800, Peter Leftwich wrote:
> Hello fellow BSD'ers! Happy holidays.
>
> I had 4.7-RELEASE on my box and then I accidentally deleted a file
> as root (I think it was /usr/lib/ld-elf.so.1 or .8) and now the
> system is not bootable any
Hello fellow BSD'ers! Happy holidays.
I had 4.7-RELEASE on my box and then I accidentally deleted a file
as root (I think it was /usr/lib/ld-elf.so.1 or .8) and now the
system is not bootable anymore (I believe this affected many
binaries such as /sbin/init and my tcsh shell)!
Could so
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Eric F Crist wrote:
> Here's what works for me:
>[...]
> #cvsup -g -L2 /root/cvs-supfile
and then:
# mergemaster -p
# cd /usr/obj
# chflags -R noschg *
# rm -rf *
> #cd /usr/src
> #make clean
> #make world
Should be:
# cd /usr/src
# make -j4 buildworld
> #conf
Hi Jeff!
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Jeff Bogari wrote:
> It's time to upgrade to 4.9-RELEASE.
> Here's what I've got so far:
>
> 1. Set the options in sysinstall to retrieve 4.9-RELEASE instead of
> 4.7-RELEASE
> 2. Used sysinstall to download the 4.9-REL
On Sunday 23 November 2003 01:52 pm, Jeff Bogari wrote:
> Thanks in advance for the expert assistance:
>
> I'm *halfway* knowledgeable with my 4.7-RELEASE system. Built it on a
> 486/66 (16MB RAM) about a year ago. It's time to upgrade to 4.9-RELEASE.
> Here's wha
Thanks in advance for the expert assistance:
I'm *halfway* knowledgeable with my 4.7-RELEASE system. Built it on a
486/66 (16MB RAM) about a year ago. It's time to upgrade to 4.9-RELEASE.
Here's what I've got so far:
1. Set the options in sysinstall to retrieve 4.9-RELEAS
ROTECTED]>
Subject: Adding packages to the 4.7-RELEASE
>
> Hello:
>
> I'm having difficulty locating a download site
> where I can get a python interpreter. I am running
> 4.7-RELEASE and both /stand/sysinstall and browing
> mirror sites using a web browser turn up nothi
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:35:03AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Your best bet is probably to go through the ports system, which I
> believe is still maintaining compatibility with 4.7.
The ports collection only supports the latest release, although many
ports will still work with older releases
Steve Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm having difficulty locating a download site
> where I can get a python interpreter. I am running
> 4.7-RELEASE and both /stand/sysinstall and browing
> mirror sites using a web browser turn up nothing.
> Can you either mai
Hello:
I'm having difficulty locating a download site
where I can get a python interpreter. I am running
4.7-RELEASE and both /stand/sysinstall and browing
mirror sites using a web browser turn up nothing.
Can you either mail me the python package or point
me to a site where I get retrie
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:38:25AM +0800, Evgeny Larionov wrote:
> I just try install some versions FreeBSD from floppy disks via FTP
> (HTTP-proxy). During instalation system unsuccessfully trying download
> necessary files from
> ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snaphots/i386/
> bacuase this directory
I just try install some versions FreeBSD from floppy disks via FTP
(HTTP-proxy). During instalation system unsuccessfully trying download
necessary files from
ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snaphots/i386/
bacuase this directory (snapshots/i386) on primary and others
ftp sites is empty. After setting U
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is related to p13 or not, but while I was doing a
'make buildworld' on p13 today my system crashed, no messages, just
powered off. I was able to duplicate this twice. At first I thought this
may be due to heat, since my machine is in a location where it is a bit
warm, and
> I was wondering if any gamer had tried to use Linux emulation to run
> the Neverwinter Nights Linux Beta Client under 4.7-RELEASE?
Reports here of people who have gotten it running.
http://nwn.bioware.com/forums/viewtopic.html?topic=203141&forum=72&sp=15
(I'm going
I was wondering if any gamer had tried to use Linux emulation to run
the Neverwinter Nights Linux Beta Client under 4.7-RELEASE? If so, did
you have any luck, or were there any hoops to jump through? I'm going
to end up trying it, but I figured that if somebody had already done it,
there
Lowell Gilbert a ecrit:
>> but i still can't mount my extented partitions (with 4.7 or 5.0). i
>> wonder if it is possible.
>
> Certainly.
>
> http://www.freebsd-fr.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-
> 1/books/faq/disks.html#MOUNT-DOS
waaahhh! it was so simple. thank you.
i had read this but i had forgot.
n
"guillaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer a ecrit:
>
> > Sounds like /sbin/mount_msdos - /sbin/mount_msdosfs on 5.0 - is
> > broken. You can rebuild the command from src in
> > /usr/src/sbin/mount_msdos - or mount_msdosfs - and doing a "make
> > install". If you don't have the sources
Mike Meyer a ecrit:
> Sounds like /sbin/mount_msdos - /sbin/mount_msdosfs on 5.0 - is
> broken. You can rebuild the command from src in
> /usr/src/sbin/mount_msdos - or mount_msdosfs - and doing a "make
> install". If you don't have the sources handy, you'll need to
> reinstall one of the distrib
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
>
> i tape: # mount -t msdos /dev/ad0s1 /hdibm
> or: # mount -t msdos /dev/fd0.1440 /floppy
> (or with ad0c, fd0c, ...)
>
> and i get "Bus error" and a core file.
Sounds like /sbin/mount_msdos - /sbin/mount_msdosfs on 5.0 - is
broken.
Mike Meyer a ecrit:
> This isn't really something that anyone can do anything useful
> with. For instance, what does "don't appear" mean? I reported that the
> devices for logical partitions weren't being created in 5.0-RELEASES
> devfs. Is it that?
>
> msdos partitions worked just fine on my 4.7
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> for information.
> i can't mount any msdos files systems with 4.7 release.
> no problem with 5.0 (except for extented partitions; the
> logicals partitions inside don't appear).
This isn't reall
for information.
i can't mount any msdos files systems with 4.7 release.
no problem with 5.0 (except for extented partitions; the
logicals partitions inside don't appear).
(Asus A7pro - IBM UDMA-66 12.6Go - IBM UDMA-100 80Go)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &q
I recently snagged the binary packages for apache-2.0.44 and
mod_python-3.0.1 from the ports/i386/ports-4-stable package
repository. The system I'm installing on is a 4.7-RELEASE box, and
I'm getting the following error from Apache:
root@galileo(ttyp2):/usr/local/etc/apache2# apach
Hi,
When I try to access the floppy on my Compaq Proliant 1600(PII-450) running
FreeBSD 4.7 (release) I get the following message(s) on the console:
(tar tvf /dev/fd0)
fdc0: cmd 13 failed at out byte 1 of 4
fdc0: Re-enable FIFO failed
fdc0: ready for input in output
fdc0: cmd 8 failed at out
[This message has also been posted.]
Can I make this Lucent/Agere winmodem work on FreeBSD
4.7-RELEASE?
The 4.7 kernel identifies this as:
pci0: (vendor 0x11c1, dev 0x48c) at 10.0
when I tell the BIOS that I have a pnp-unaware OS, it sticks
That is exactly what I was referring to. And as I understand it now, the
latest handbook contains all the information I need to support 4.7-RELEASE.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:02 PM
To: William Wallace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-02-06 15:36, William Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody know if it's still possible to download the latest 4.7-RELEASE
> version of the handbook? I noticed that the most recent one pertains to
> 5.0-RELEASE
Anybody know if it's still possible to download the latest 4.7-RELEASE
version of the handbook? I noticed that the most recent one pertains to
5.0-RELEASE.
Thanks,
- William.
<>
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:52, Redmond Militante wrote:
> hi all
>
> anyone know how to get gtk themes going from from within kde 3.1? i've tried
>googling this and asking in irc, to no avail. i've installed gtk-theme-switch and
>gtk-themes-collection from ports, it doesn't seem to work from wit
hi all
anyone know how to get gtk themes going from from within kde 3.1? i've tried googling
this and asking in irc, to no avail. i've installed gtk-theme-switch and
gtk-themes-collection from ports, it doesn't seem to work from within kde, it works
however, from within gnome. the error i ge
My 4.7-RELEASE XFree86 also states 5.0-CURRENT. I installed the XFree86 distribution
using /stand/sysinstall. Everything works fine. :)
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:08:15 -0500
Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 9:15 PM +0700 1/16/02, Pavel Burovsky wrote:
> >Excuse
At 9:15 PM +0700 1/16/02, Pavel Burovsky wrote:
Excuse me for, perhaps, plaqued question.
FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE (I obtained it from www.linuxcenter.ru) contains
the XFree86 server built on 5.0-CURRENT snapshot(anyway it so reported
by XFree86 server). Is it normal? FAQ says it's not.
I
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 12:06:11AM -0500, Jim Trigg wrote:
> (Note: the first two tries at sending this apparently got eaten by the
> ether... in case they show up, please know that I am now subscribed to
> the list.)
>
> I am having problems building the cyrus-sasl2 port on
twig les wrote:
Hey all, I have a 4.7 release box that needs to cvsup
its ports. The problem is that this box never sees
the outside world normally; it does IDS on an IP-less
interface and of course has a backnet interface. So
basically I added a temporary IP address to this box,
edited my /etc
Hey all, I have a 4.7 release box that needs to cvsup
its ports. The problem is that this box never sees
the outside world normally; it does IDS on an IP-less
interface and of course has a backnet interface. So
basically I added a temporary IP address to this box,
edited my /etc/cvsupfile to use
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Curtis, Brian A.--ORISE wrote:
> Subject: Problem with FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE after installation
>
>
> I've attempted to install FreeBSD 4.7 on an a new HP computer (734n) with an
> AMD Athlon XP 2400. In doing so, I ran across a few problems. They
ported on Linux. Don't know about
FreeBSD.
4. Is there a graphical login option available for FreeBSD? Also, how can
I set up FreeBSD to load GNOME at start/login?
"uname -a" output:
FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #0: Wed Oct 9 15:08:34 GMT 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pavel Burovsky wrote:
FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE (I obtained it from www.linuxcenter.ru) contains
the XFree86 server built on 5.0-CURRENT snapshot(anyway it so reported
by XFree86 server). Is it normal? FAQ says it's not.
I've noticed this as well, but I don't know why. I haven
Excuse me for, perhaps, plaqued question.
FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE (I obtained it from www.linuxcenter.ru) contains
the XFree86 server built on 5.0-CURRENT snapshot(anyway it so reported
by XFree86 server). Is it normal? FAQ says it's not.
I would pleased for every answer :)
Pavel.
To Unsubs
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> problems, upon reboot after the install is complete the system reports a
> disk error and FreeBSD will not boot from the hard drive, it does not
> begin loading FreeBSD or anything at all. Other OS's have worked on the
Since you have it running, use "boot0cfg"
TED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:12 AM
Subject: Re[2]: 4.7 Release hangs upon Sendmail startup.
> Hello Daxbert,
>
> Monday, January 13, 2003, 12:09:04, you wrote:
>
> >>When I install BSD on a colo machine (actually 2 machines)
> >
Hello Metin,
Monday, January 13, 2003, 12:12:19, you wrote:
> Hello Daxbert,
> Monday, January 13, 2003, 12:09:04, you wrote:
>>>When I install BSD on a colo machine (actually 2 machines)
>>>And after the installation I reboot the machine..
>>>It hangs on the startup:
>> I've had problems like
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 12:02:26PM +0100, Metin de Dwaas wrote:
> When I install BSD on a colo machine (actually 2 machines)
> And after the installation I reboot the machine..
> It hangs on the startup:
>
> "Starting Daemons: sshd sendmail sendmail-mclient" something like
> that.. when i disable
Hello Daxbert,
Monday, January 13, 2003, 12:09:04, you wrote:
>>When I install BSD on a colo machine (actually 2 machines)
>>And after the installation I reboot the machine..
>>It hangs on the startup:
> I've had problems like this when name resolution was broken.
> Confirm name resolution is 'h
>When I install BSD on a colo machine (actually 2 machines)
>And after the installation I reboot the machine..
>It hangs on the startup:
I've had problems like this when name resolution was broken.
Confirm name resolution is 'happy'. Check the following...
/etc/hosts
/etc/resolv.conf
no firewall
endmail -bd" it wont come up.. shouldnt the mailserver come up with
the default settings also?
I was using the mini-iso from 4.7-STABLE (which actually seems to be
4.7-RELEASE)
Anyone?
gr,
dwaas
--
Gr,
dwaasje
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
please hit enter every now and then while typing. lines as long as
1040 characters are a bit excessive.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:52:55 -0400:
> I am attempting an installation of 4.7 Release made from ISO a few
> days ago on the following system: AMD Athlon 1400 Aopen AK
AQ's
disk/fs/boot section were really helpful. also look into boot(8).
/ayn
On 0, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> My apologies for the re-post, I sent first MIME-Encoded by mistake,
>
> Hi,
> I am attempting an installation of 4.7 Release made from ISO a few
Hi,
My apologies for the re-post, I sent first MIME-Encoded by mistake,
Hi,
I am attempting an installation of 4.7 Release made from ISO a few days
ago on the following system: AMD Athlon 1400 Aopen AK77-333 MB Western
Digital Caviar 20GB Hard Disk
The system boots from CD A OK, and runs through
Hi,
I am attempting an installation of 4.7 Release made from ISO a few days ago on the
following system: AMD Athlon 1400 Aopen AK77-333 MB Western Digital Caviar 20GB Hard
Disk
The system boots from CD A OK, and runs through the install without any problems, upon
reboot after the install is
(Note: the first two tries at sending this apparently got eaten by the ether... in
case they show up, please know that I am now subscribed to the list.)
I am having problems building the cyrus-sasl2 port on 4.7-RELEASE; no matter how I
attempt to override it, it keeps deciding that the gssapi
2).
dmesg output:
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #0: Wed Oct 9 15:08:34 GMT 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/u
On 2003-01-02 00:00, Mark Fujie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm about to attempt an upgrade of one of my servers (bind 9, postfix)
> from 4.6.2 -> 4.7. Looking at the options in /etc/defaults/make.conf,
> I'm pretty sure I want to include the following in /etc/make.conf:
>
> NO_BIND= true
> NO_SE
Hi!
> NO_BIND= true
> NO_SENDMAIL= true
>
> Do also need to include "NO_MAILWRAPPER= true"?
I don't think so. My mailserver running Postfix has been upgraded from
4.3 to 4.5 to 4.6 to 4.7, and I've never used NO_MAILWRAPPER.
--
Toomas Aas | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/
I'm about to attempt an upgrade of one of my servers (bind 9, postfix)
from 4.6.2 -> 4.7. Looking at the options in /etc/defaults/make.conf,
I'm pretty sure I want to include the following in /etc/make.conf:
NO_BIND= true
NO_SENDMAIL= true
Do also need to include "NO_MAILWRAPPER= true"?
Reading
I have a fresh install of 4.7 RELEASE on a AMD K6-200 with 32 MB RAM. And,
I keep getting kernel panics.
The first sign of any problem was while I was installing. I checked the CD
for md5sum errors. But, it was ok. So, I tried an FTP (passive) install.
Still, every attempt crapped out until I
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:30:11AM -0800, Jeff Bogari wrote:
> Please advise as to where to pursue resources on the date command,
> specifically, help or examples regarding setting (reinstating) daylight
> savings time. Man pages have been inadequate on this sub-topic, and
> extensive web search h
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:30:11AM -0800, Jeff Bogari wrote:
> Please advise as to where to pursue resources on the date command,
> specifically, help or examples regarding setting (reinstating) daylight
> savings time. Man pages have been inadequate on this sub-topic, and
> extensive web search h
Please advise as to where to pursue resources on the date command,
specifically, help or examples regarding setting (reinstating) daylight
savings time. Man pages have been inadequate on this sub-topic, and
extensive web search has provided only anecdotal information.
Also, in my search I have no
I upgraded my system from 4.6-RC2 to 4.7-RELEASE and now every
ethernet packet I receive crashes the system with fatal trap 12:
supervisor read, page not present. This did not happen with 4.6.
This is how I know:
When I ping another computer, I immediately crash.
When another computer pings me
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 23:35, John Carri wrote:
> From: Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 03 Dec 2002 11:58:16 -0500
>
> >Do a make distclean in the devel/gnomevfs directory, then try to
> >rebuild.
> --
> Thank you for the suggestion, I tried this, unfortunately it
Go to /usr/ports/devel/gnomevfs and download the newest files for that
port from a freebsd ftp mirror and then try to do a make install on
galeon again and that should work. Looks like you updated galeon to the
newest version but not gnomevfs
Dave
John Carri wrote:
From: Joe Marcus Clarke <[
From: Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 03 Dec 2002 11:58:16 -0500
>Do a make distclean in the devel/gnomevfs directory, then try to
>rebuild.
--
Thank you for the suggestion, I tried this, unfortunately it didn't fix the
problem:
su
passwd
cd /usr/ports/devel/gno
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 11:58, John Carri wrote:
> Hello,
> I recently installed FreeBSD 4.7-release onto an old spare PC (266 MHz PII)
> so I could learn more about FreeBSD. Consider me a pretty raw newbie right
> now.
>
> Yesterday I attempted to use the ports collect
Hello,
I recently installed FreeBSD 4.7-release onto an old spare PC (266 MHz PII)
so I could learn more about FreeBSD. Consider me a pretty raw newbie right
now.
Yesterday I attempted to use the ports collection to install the Galeon web
browser, but the process aborted
On Friday, November 22, 2002 5:05 AM, Laszlo Vagner wrote
>
> lewiz wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:25:39AM +0530, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Will the nvidia drivers work with 4.7-RELEASE? 4.7-STABLE won't have
> >>ISOs, righ
I am having trouble getting 4.7-RELEASE to use my sound card, a Creative
VIBRA 128 PCI. (Known in other regions of the world as a Creative Ensoniq
AudioPCI, Soundblaster 16 PCI, and Audio PCI 128, according to the manual.)
The card is PnP-compatible (according to the manual), so following the
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:11:28AM +, Alex Drummond wrote:
> Interesting to see that other people found they worked fine with RELEASE. I
> had to update my system to STABLE before GLX would work, although I had no
> problems otherwise. Also, GLX would only work with an XFree86 installed from
Interesting to see that other people found they worked fine with RELEASE. I
had to update my system to STABLE before GLX would work, although I had no
problems otherwise. Also, GLX would only work with an XFree86 installed from
ports, not with one installed from the FreeBSD binaries on xfree86.o
On Friday, November 22, 2002 5:05 AM, Laszlo Vagner wrote:
>
> lewiz wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:25:39AM +0530, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
> >
> >>Will the nvidia drivers work with 4.7-RELEASE? 4.7-STABLE won't have
> >>ISOs, right?
> >
I had them working just fine on -RELEASE.
Ken
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, lewiz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:25:39AM +0530, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
> > Will the nvidia drivers work with 4.7-RELEASE? 4.7-STABLE won't have
> > ISOs, right?
>
> You need 4.7-STABLE
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:25:39AM +0530, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
> Will the nvidia drivers work with 4.7-RELEASE? 4.7-STABLE won't have
> ISOs, right?
You need 4.7-STABLE to get the NVidia drivers working. I don't know
exactly what -RELEASE is missing but I'm quite s
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-11-21 11:30:30 +0200:
> > I had a weird problem a while ago that after installing
> > FreeBSD 4.6 RELEASE sendmail was not accepting local mail
> > for delivery.
> >
> > After looking at "mail -v " I saw that sendmail was
> > not accepting relaying for the localhost.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-11-21 11:30:30 +0200:
> I had a weird problem a while ago that after installing
> FreeBSD 4.6 RELEASE sendmail was not accepting local mail
> for delivery.
>
> After looking at "mail -v " I saw that sendmail was
> not accepting relaying for the localhost. Now I could
>
Hi all,
I had a weird problem a while ago that after installing
FreeBSD 4.6 RELEASE sendmail was not accepting local mail
for delivery.
After looking at "mail -v " I saw that sendmail was
not accepting relaying for the localhost. Now I could
telnet to localhost on port 25 and that worked so SMT
Hi
Will the nvidia drivers work with 4.7-RELEASE? 4.7-STABLE won't have
ISOs, right?
Regards
Gautham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> Yep - I'm using them on 4.7-RELEASE right now. Myth II runs great :)
Quake 3, Wolfenstein, tuxracer, and UT2003 all work on my machine.
However, ut2003 refused to work on my hardware while using the nvidia
agpgart. I had to switch to using FreeBSD's agpgart.
Ken
To Unsubscribe:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 07:43:39 -0500 (EST)
> From: Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Gautham Ganapathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Questions @ FreeBSD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: nVidia dri
It works fine with -RELEASE.
Ken
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
> Hi
>
> Will the nvidia drivers work with 4.7-RELEASE? 4.7-STABLE won't have
> ISOs, right?
>
> Regards
> Gautham
>
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsub
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:38:56PM +0530, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
> Will the nvidia drivers work with 4.7-RELEASE?
The release notes say:
- FreeBSD -STABLE, version 4.7 or later
which should include 4.7-RELEASE. There have been various reports
around the mailing lists of people getting
Hi
Will the nvidia drivers work with 4.7-RELEASE? 4.7-STABLE won't have
ISOs, right?
Regards
Gautham
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Ganapathy;Gautham
FN:Gautham Ganapathy
ORG:Wipro Technologies;TI PIC (DSP)
TITLE:Technical Support Engg
TEL;WORK;VOICE:+91-80-8520408x4277
TEL;HOME;VOICE:+
Hi, I can build a custom kernel fine, but when I execute 'make buildworld'
from /usr/src, I get a lot of errors relating to libgroff (see bellow). I
have all the (4.7-RELEASE) source packages installed. Does anyone have any
idea what the problem might be?
Would be really grateful fo
I am giving up on this problem and chalking it up to a very similiar
bug that's been in open the buglist for a year or so. I also tried
upgrading the controller firmware to 4.5, tried booting using the
verbose option and w/kernel debugging turned on, but I couldn't
identify any errors giving me a
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:23:10 -0800 (PST)
> > I recently upgraded an IBM A20m laptop to 4.7-RELEASE and it appears
> > that the new version of the X server is broken.
>
> No, it isn't, the problem is that you're running at 8bit colour depth,
> hence, the probl
> +++ Archie Cobbs [12/11/02 13:23 -0800]:
> > I recently upgraded an IBM A20m laptop to 4.7-RELEASE and it appears
> > that the new version of the X server is broken.
> >
> > The problem is that applications can no longer allocate colors... e.g.:
>
> See below,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently upgraded an IBM A20m laptop to 4.7-RELEASE and it appears
> that the new version of the X server is broken.
No, it isn't, the problem is that you're running at 8bit colour dept
I recently upgraded an IBM A20m laptop to 4.7-RELEASE and it appears
that the new version of the X server is broken.
The problem is that applications can no longer allocate colors... e.g.:
Fvwm-95: in function GetColor: <> can't allocate color #808080
*FvwmTaskBar: cannot o
27;ed it to the latest
(patched) release version.
Thanks again,
Michael
At 08:14 AM 9/11/2002 -0600, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
From: "Markus Landgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Upgrading to 4.7-RELEASE
> On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 09:51, Michael Ritchie wrote:
&g
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
