On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:44:38 -0500 (EST)
Ken Cochran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> How I "refresh" a system binary?
>
> More specifically, I think I may have a compromised(?) named
> in /usr/sbin but what I have in /usr/obj should be fine;
> if not I still have it in /usr/src and can rebu
Ken Cochran writes:
> How I "refresh" a system binary?
Assuming your source tree is the same version as installed
system ... I have been able to just go to the appropriate directory,
type "make && make install". This _not_ the canonical way, and I
wouldn't bet the rent money on
so, so far, behavior survives
reloading, restarting & completely killing & restarting named.
Umm... what else can I think of... No external IPs are in the
named config and/or zone files, only local 192.168 & 127 things.
I can't find any zombie processes so far(?)
OS is:
4.1
Hi:
I'm in the process of doing a clean install on an older server that was
running 4.10-STABLE to 6.1-STABLE. For the most part, it's been smooth,
but I have a few questions:
On boot, I get a couple of kernel messages that don't look optimal, and I
just want to make sure there
[redirected to questions@ since this is not -net stuff]
Hi, Julius,
å 2005-03-16äç 17:01 +0300ïJulius Kidubukaåéï
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to upgrade from 4.10-RELEASE to 4.10-STABLE and I have gone
> through the following steps;
>
> 1. make buildworld
> 2. make buildk
Hello,
I've got a 4.10-STABLE box on which I'm trying to install KDE-3.3.1. I
performed a fresh cvsup of ports yesterday (06 Dec 04). Leading up to
this build, I deinstalled all ports, then added: perl5.8, xorg
This is where the kdelibs comile fails:
c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 10:43:09AM -0500, Ada Cheng wrote:
> Also don't forget to do a portsdb -Uu after you have cvsup and before
> portupgrade.
> Cheers,
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
> >[Andy Firman, 2004-11-15]
> >> Or is there some mechanism to get .80 in from the ports
Also don't forget to do a portsdb -Uu after you have cvsup and before
portupgrade.
Cheers,
Ada
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
[Andy Firman, 2004-11-15]
Or is there some mechanism to get .80 in from the ports?
Update your ports-tree using cvsup to get an up-to-date version.
Y
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Firman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 9:33 AM
Subject: What is preferred method to get new software on 4.10 stable?
>
> Let's take Clamav for example. My freshclam logs
[Andy Firman, 2004-11-15]
> Or is there some mechanism to get .80 in from the ports?
Update your ports-tree using cvsup to get an up-to-date version.
You should then install portupgrade, if you don't allready have it.
Updating clamav from 0.75 to 0.80 should then be as easy as:
# portupgrade
Let's take Clamav for example. My freshclam logs say this:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately !
So, I have clamav-0.75.1 installed from ports.
What would be the proper way to get clamav .80 installed?
pkg_delete clamav-0.75.1 and then install .80 from sou
I've install my client libraries in
/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client and set the
environment
variables as below
setenv ORACLE_BASE
/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client
setenv ORACLE_HOME
/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/client
setenv TNS_ADMIN
/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/9.0.1/
I am a new FreeBSD user coming from Debian Linux.
I think I have finally got the upgrading process done right. I just
need to know if I am missing anything or have something configured
wrong. I have gotten bits and pieces from this forum, FreeBSD handbook
and the examples that came with this insta
Hi
I am using FreeBSD 4.10 stable (cvsupped about a month ago), and I have hit
a problem
with the firewall configuration and allowing a specific application to
work. At the moment
all sorts of things work correctly:
The FreeBSD machine acts as a test-server and firewall when I'm working
Also the VM's gateway setting had to be that of my Linksys router, and
not the "Host IP" of my FreeBSD machine.
I ended up running VMWare 2.0 on FreeBSD 4.10-Stable. I will make
another attempt at VMWare 3.2 and also using FBSD 5.x when I have more
time (in
vmnet1.BridgedInterface = "x10"
Phusion does mention the "x10" in his instructions for the /etc/rc.firewall.
My IP setting are:
Linksys Router: 192.168.0.1
FreeBSD 4.10-Stable PC
Static IP: 192.168.0.24
DNS Server: 167.206.1.103
Gateway:192.168.0.1
SubnetM
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, John Von Essen wrote:
After upgrading to 4.10-STABLE I have noticed some weird issues with email.
My remote clients are unable to connect to the mail server, even though they
can access websites on it. Since they arent even getting to the server, the
logs show nothing. At
After upgrading to 4.10-STABLE I have noticed some weird issues with
email. My remote clients are unable to connect to the mail server, even
though they can access websites on it. Since they arent even getting to
the server, the logs show nothing. At first I suspected networking
issues. I
+++ Joe Kraft [freebsd] [24-08-04 22:49 +0100]:
|
|
| Chuck Swiger wrote:
| >Joe Kraft wrote:
| >
| >>I'm using a 4.10-STABLE based firewall, which is happily chugging
| >>along. It's sending it's daily messages to a local account via
| >>sendmail, w
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Joe Kraft wrote:
I'm using a 4.10-STABLE based firewall, which is happily chugging
along. It's sending it's daily messages to a local account via
sendmail, which I check by logging in using an ssh connection.
[ ... ]
3) Is there a way to convince send
Joe Kraft wrote:
I'm using a 4.10-STABLE based firewall, which is happily chugging along.
It's sending it's daily messages to a local account via sendmail, which
I check by logging in using an ssh connection.
[ ... ]
3) Is there a way to convince sendmail to send to somethi
I'm using a 4.10-STABLE based firewall, which is happily chugging along.
It's sending it's daily messages to a local account via sendmail,
which I check by logging in using an ssh connection.
I would like to have it send those mails to another mail server behind
the firewall,
>-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 6:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 4.10-STABLE
> Needing some help here,
> I'm experincing compatibility iss
sysinstall, got to configure, then options, and set the
"Release Nmae" to 4.10-RELEASE. Packages are only built for releases,
not the -STABLE branch. 4.10-STABLE is similar enough to 4.10-RELEASE
that the packages should work. If they don't, install from ports
ins
Needing some help here,
I'm experincing compatibility issues with Perl and trying
to reinstall ports/src but Sysinstall has tryed alot of ftp mirrors even the main one
and it says "Warning: Can't find the `4.0-STABLE` distribution on this FTP server.
I cant download anything under Distribtutions
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 04:36:26PM -0400, andrew kagan wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I've been trying to install xfree86 at the same time I'm installing 4.10
> stable.
>
> The graphical configuration tool comes up fine, but when I try to specify
> the adapter, there'
Hi andrew,
I'm running freeBSD 5.2 with a ati radeon card. In the xf86cfg
go to configure video card(s), near the bottom will be 'vesa vesa'
select it. I have been using it with my radeon card and have had no
problems.
Hope this helps some.
Brett
Hi All:
I've been trying to install xfree86 at the same time I'm installing 4.10
stable.
The graphical configuration tool comes up fine, but when I try to specify
the adapter, there's nothing in the list that refers to "ATI" at all.
If I try to select the default vga
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:42:55AM -0400, Michael W. Oliver wrote:
> On 2004-06-18T16:37:47+0200, Gareth Bailey wrote:
> > I moved our work server over from 5.2 release to 4.10
> > stable. All seems fine except for some reason apache
> > (apache-1.3.31_2) doesn't sart
On 18 Jun 2004 at 10:42, Michael W. Oliver wrote:
> On 2004-06-18T16:37:47+0200, Gareth Bailey wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I moved our work server over from 5.2 release to 4.10
> > stable. All seems fine except for some reason apache
> > (apache-1.3.31_2) doesn&
On 2004-06-18T16:37:47+0200, Gareth Bailey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I moved our work server over from 5.2 release to 4.10
> stable. All seems fine except for some reason apache
> (apache-1.3.31_2) doesn't sart automatically at boot time.
>
> Does starting apache at boot tim
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Gareth Bailey wrote:
> Does starting apache at boot time differ on 4.10 to 5.2? I
> have the apache.sh script in rc.d/ and it has correct
> privileges.
Anything in /var/log/httpd_error_log ? In particular check any
critical erros from mod_unique_id about (reverse) resolutio
Hi all,
I moved our work server over from 5.2 release to 4.10
stable. All seems fine except for some reason apache
(apache-1.3.31_2) doesn't sart automatically at boot time.
Does starting apache at boot time differ on 4.10 to 5.2? I
have the apache.sh script in rc.d/ and it has co
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:22:45 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> i run into somekind of trouble after upgrading to the latest stable
>version of FreeBSD.
>
> After building and installing a new kernel and world from
> 4.9-Stable to 4.10-Stable the ppp-Deamon ca
Hello All,
i run into somekind of trouble after upgrading to the latest stable version of FreeBSD.
After building and installing a new kernel and world from 4.9-Stable to 4.10-Stable
the ppp-Deamon can't connect to my isp anymore.
I have to switch to the old kernel to get it up and ru
On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:36 pm, JJB wrote:
> The official 4.10 schedule says 4.10 stable release was scheduled
> for May 5.
> The FTP sites still have RC2 and the 4.10 to-do list talks about
> RC3.
> Anybody from the release team care to comment on what is the holdup
> and whe
community.
please, watch your attitude. thanks
ulisse bemer
IT consultant (& FreeBSD user)
- Original Message -
From: "JJB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 2:36 PM
Subject: 4.10 stable re
The official 4.10 schedule says 4.10 stable release was scheduled
for May 5.
The FTP sites still have RC2 and the 4.10 to-do list talks about
RC3.
Anybody from the release team care to comment on what is the holdup
and when 4.10 going to be updated to the mirror FTP sites?
http://www.freebsd.org
38 matches
Mail list logo
