On 10/17/05, Bill Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Mon, 17 Oct 2005 it looks like Andrew P. composed:
>
>
>
> >
> > It's not a problem with FreeBSD, really. The ports
> > themselves should get to work under amd64.
>
> Ahh, very good point. I didn't look at it from that angle.
>
> > 200
Andrew P. wrote:
On 10/17/05, Bill Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:
Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:
Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
Gr, is there a list of all the ports that don't wo
At Mon, 17 Oct 2005 it looks like Andrew P. composed:
It's not a problem with FreeBSD, really. The ports
themselves should get to work under amd64.
Ahh, very good point. I didn't look at it from that angle.
2006 will probably become the year of widespread
adoption of 64-bit computing. Un
On 10/17/05, Bill Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:
>
> > Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
> >> At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:
> >>
> >>> Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
> >>>
> Gr, is there a list of all the ports that don
At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:
Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:
Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
Gr, is there a list of all the ports that don't work on
AMD64 machines? I just attempted to install the above :(
http://pointyh