Re: LAGG bug or misconfiguration???

2012-03-23 Thread Snoop
alone won't do it, you need "spanning-tree > portfast trunk". > > Additionally, are you using link aggregation on the cisco swi ? > (channel-group) > > > On 3/16/12 5:31 PM, Snoop wrote: > > That's the STP configuration on my two switch

Re: LAGG bug or misconfiguration???

2012-03-16 Thread Snoop
hould see fast transition for your VLANs to forwarding state. > > > Are your ports in access or trunk mode ? > > If they're trunked, portfast alone won't do it, you need "spanning-tree > portfast trunk". > > Additionally, are you using link aggregation on th

Re: LAGG bug or misconfiguration???

2012-03-16 Thread Snoop
the case of a *failover* configuration, is a > "spanning-tree portfast" feature so that your port doesn't transition > through the different spantree states before forwarding traffic. > > Kindly obtain the configuration from whoever has it and let us know. > > >

Re: LAGG bug or misconfiguration???

2012-03-16 Thread Snoop
r, in the case of a *failover* configuration, is a > "spanning-tree portfast" feature so that your port doesn't transition > through the different spantree states before forwarding traffic. > > Kindly obtain the configuration from whoever has it and let us know. > > > On 3/1

Re: LAGG bug or misconfiguration???

2012-03-16 Thread Snoop
configurations. > > We're using VLAN tagging over lagg failover interfaces at work and I have > already tried the tests you described, to much better results. > > We're also running 8.2 so the only thing that seems to differ between us is > the switch config, li

LAGG bug or misconfiguration???

2012-03-15 Thread Snoop
Hi there, a while after setting up my new server (with 8 jails in it) I've decided (after postponing several times) to properly check the functionality of the lagg and the result was very disappointing. The test I've done is very simple. I've started copying a file from one site to another of my V

Re: Jails within different networks ... ?

2011-12-04 Thread Snoop
Just an update. It seems to be working well. The jail startup slowness I believe is due to the fact that the DNS is still down. Thanks for your time. ### host rc.conf related section ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto failover laggport bge0 laggport bge1 xxx.xxx.26.224/24" ifconfig_lagg0_alias_0="inet xxx

Re: Jails within different networks ... ?

2011-12-04 Thread Snoop
wrote: > On 03/12/2011 17:54, Snoop wrote: > > I have 3 jails within the host xxx.xxx.26.224 configured in this way > > (below) and everything works well. > > What if I want to enable another jail but I don't want to assign to that > > my next available public ip add

Jails within different networks ... ?

2011-12-03 Thread Snoop
Hi there, I've a doubt! I have 3 jails within the host xxx.xxx.26.224 configured in this way (below) and everything works well. What if I want to enable another jail but I don't want to assign to that my next available public ip address xxx.xxx.26.228/24 but I want this jail to have a private ip ad

Re: LAGG and Jails?

2011-11-24 Thread Snoop
active laggproto failover laggport: bge1 flags=0<> laggport: bge0 flags=5 Sorry for bothering you guys. Hope this would save some time to someone else. Cheers. On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 13:37 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 11/18/11 8:09 AM, Snoop wrote: > &g

LAGG and Jails?

2011-11-17 Thread Snoop
Does anyone know if it's possible to configure lagg for network redundancy on a FreeBSD server containing jails? I'm having problems with that. I couldn't found much around therefore I'm not even sure it's "doable". Thanks in advance, any tip will be appreciated. -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmett

Re: CARP related trivial question

2011-11-03 Thread Snoop
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 17:28 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi, > Reference: > > From: Damien Fleuriot > > Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:44:50 +0100 > > Message-id: <4eb16572.4080...@my.gd> > > Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 11/

CARP related trivial question

2011-11-01 Thread Snoop
Sorry but I have to re-post my question as I didn't get any exhaustive reply. I can't believe that nobody is aware of this anyhow. P.S. Nop, there aren't related loadable modules in /boot/kernel. Hi everybody, I've got a pretty trivial question but I'm kind of disoriented. In the CA

Re: CARP related trivial question

2011-10-28 Thread Snoop
Thanks for replying Dave, that's the problem. There's no module and apparently it's supposed to be there. Ready to be loaded. :-O Mistake in the FreeBSD handbook? On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 14:14 -0700, Robison, Dave wrote: > On 10/26/2011 12:20, Snoop wrote: > > Hi everybod

CARP related trivial question

2011-10-26 Thread Snoop
Hi everybody, I've got a pretty trivial question but I'm kind of disoriented. In the CARP man pages is clearly stated http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/carp.html: __ "To enable support for CARP, the FreeBSD ke

GUIDE

2004-07-05 Thread snoop dogg
hello there, i have FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE installed in my machine.. but i need to upgrade my 4.9-RELEASE to 4.9-STABLE. any help? and tips on what to do? bcoz im kinda scared of kernel panic and crush thenks i need to know what file is needed to download to upgrade and commands.. exact comman