On 6/21/12 11:21 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Only after you, my man
On 6/21/12 10:30 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
z> wrote:
programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered.
This has not been decided in court yet.
sources please!
Logical fallacy -- looking for a non-existence proof.
___
freebsd-questions
On 6/21/12 10:36 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
sources please!
Google "GPLv3 court case". There are no applicable results. Until a
Judge decides what the license truly means everyone using it is at risk.
true.
But why anyone from FreeBSD fundation didn't just write official
letter to GNU "Fr
On 6/21/12 10:16 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
"We put clang because sponsors wanted it."
Sponsors didn't want clang. Sponsors wanted not to be encumbered by a
GPLv3
they are not.
programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered.
Programs that link to GPLv3 libraries are encumbered.
On 6/21/12 10:08 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Second, FreeBSD is not a commercial company, and while this argument
may have a merit
for commercial sponsors of FreeBSD, it has zero bearing on FreeBSD
itself.
You seem to be unaware of what percentage of the development and
maintenance staff and t
On 6/21/12 9:47 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
True but this applies as much to you. You think you know it all and
that is quite the probdlem with you.
And "discussing" with you is a true waste with this attittute. Even
its free.
so stop it.
This mailing list isn't your blog. If you want to
On 6/21/12 1:40 AM, Michel Talon wrote:
Second, FreeBSD is not a commercial company, and while this argument may have a
merit
for commercial sponsors of FreeBSD, it has zero bearing on FreeBSD itself.
You seem to be unaware of what percentage of the development and
maintenance staff and the m
On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:32 AM, "Dave" wrote:
> On 1 Apr 2012 at 19:05, Jerry wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:50:42 +1000
>> Da Rock articulated:
>>
>>> Given that the other tech in question asked me to help him, and he
>>> is a Winblows nut like yourself, I think this premise can be
>>> dismiss
It's a lot like complaining that your bull is counterproductive
because it isn't a cow and therefore won't yield milk.
If one's definition of "productive" is "expands the amount of software
in the universe that is non-proprietary," then perhaps the BSD license
is "non-productive" -- but that
On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
>
> Whether or not he agrees with them is a matter of philosophical interest
> only, so long as he keeps to the terms.
Agree TO them, not agree WITH them.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Gary Kline wrote:
no diff. i also filled in "smart-host" in the .mc file. i did a
make install. no difference...
gary
Those would have no effect.
Send the file to me.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Gary Kline wrote:
Neither works; I thought the second mightt. *Which* config file?
Your sendmail config file.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send a
Gary Kline wrote:
Jan 4 15:01:07 tao sendmail[21840]: m04N16F5021840: from=kline, size=549, class=0,
nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan 4 15:01:07 tao sendmail[21840]: m04N16F5021840: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
ctladdr=kline (1004/1004), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer
RW wrote:
Why not? It's only 20 hours, sounds like a lot less hassle than
finding/buying/installing a new card..
Because I can't afford 20 hours of slammed I/O on our main hosting
server, plus I need to add the card in order to use the drive for
ongoing backups anyway.
(Also, I don't wor
Does anyone know one or two PCI USB cards that are compatible with
FreeBSD 5.4?
(Please let's hold off on the "upgrade, you fool" messages -- the cycle is:
- install USB 2.0 card
- back up to USB drive
- upgrade
...and backing up 75GB at 1MB/sec isn't gonna fly.)
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I'm aware of SMTP retries- just trying to gauge how long it will take - as I
have certain users that become very unhappy when they see a massage arrive
more than an hour after it was originally sent.
There's a reason email is called email and not instant messaging.
__
16 matches
Mail list logo