Re: Is ZFS production ready?

2012-06-21 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On 6/21/12 11:21 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" Only after you, my man

Re: Why Clang

2012-06-21 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On 6/21/12 10:30 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: z> wrote: programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered. This has not been decided in court yet. sources please! Logical fallacy -- looking for a non-existence proof. ___ freebsd-questions

Re: Why Clang

2012-06-21 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On 6/21/12 10:36 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: sources please! Google "GPLv3 court case". There are no applicable results. Until a Judge decides what the license truly means everyone using it is at risk. true. But why anyone from FreeBSD fundation didn't just write official letter to GNU "Fr

Re: Why Clang

2012-06-21 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On 6/21/12 10:16 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: "We put clang because sponsors wanted it." Sponsors didn't want clang. Sponsors wanted not to be encumbered by a GPLv3 they are not. programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered. Programs that link to GPLv3 libraries are encumbered.

Re: Why Clang

2012-06-21 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On 6/21/12 10:08 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: Second, FreeBSD is not a commercial company, and while this argument may have a merit for commercial sponsors of FreeBSD, it has zero bearing on FreeBSD itself. You seem to be unaware of what percentage of the development and maintenance staff and t

Re: Is ZFS production ready?

2012-06-21 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On 6/21/12 9:47 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: True but this applies as much to you. You think you know it all and that is quite the probdlem with you. And "discussing" with you is a true waste with this attittute. Even its free. so stop it. This mailing list isn't your blog. If you want to

Re: Why Clang

2012-06-21 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On 6/21/12 1:40 AM, Michel Talon wrote: Second, FreeBSD is not a commercial company, and while this argument may have a merit for commercial sponsors of FreeBSD, it has zero bearing on FreeBSD itself. You seem to be unaware of what percentage of the development and maintenance staff and the m

Re: Access to Time Warner cable network

2012-04-02 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:32 AM, "Dave" wrote: > On 1 Apr 2012 at 19:05, Jerry wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:50:42 +1000 >> Da Rock articulated: >> >>> Given that the other tech in question asked me to help him, and he >>> is a Winblows nut like yourself, I think this premise can be >>> dismiss

Re: Is this bunk.

2010-08-22 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
It's a lot like complaining that your bull is counterproductive because it isn't a cow and therefore won't yield milk. If one's definition of "productive" is "expands the amount of software in the universe that is non-proprietary," then perhaps the BSD license is "non-productive" -- but that

Re: Just want to ask

2010-06-29 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Whether or not he agrees with them is a matter of philosophical interest > only, so long as he keeps to the terms. Agree TO them, not agree WITH them. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing

Re: one solved ; yet one new issue.

2008-01-05 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
Gary Kline wrote: no diff. i also filled in "smart-host" in the .mc file. i did a make install. no difference... gary Those would have no effect. Send the file to me. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list h

Re: one solved ; yet one new issue.

2008-01-04 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
Gary Kline wrote: Neither works; I thought the second mightt. *Which* config file? Your sendmail config file. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send a

Re: one solved ; yet one new issue.

2008-01-04 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
Gary Kline wrote: Jan 4 15:01:07 tao sendmail[21840]: m04N16F5021840: from=kline, size=549, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan 4 15:01:07 tao sendmail[21840]: m04N16F5021840: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=kline (1004/1004), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer

Re: USB 2.0 PCI card for FreeBSD 5.4?

2007-09-25 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
RW wrote: Why not? It's only 20 hours, sounds like a lot less hassle than finding/buying/installing a new card.. Because I can't afford 20 hours of slammed I/O on our main hosting server, plus I need to add the card in order to use the drive for ongoing backups anyway. (Also, I don't wor

USB 2.0 PCI card for FreeBSD 5.4?

2007-09-24 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
Does anyone know one or two PCI USB cards that are compatible with FreeBSD 5.4? (Please let's hold off on the "upgrade, you fool" messages -- the cycle is: - install USB 2.0 card - back up to USB drive - upgrade ...and backing up 75GB at 1MB/sec isn't gonna fly.)

Re: reboot in single user

2007-07-09 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
Jean-Paul Natola wrote: I'm aware of SMTP retries- just trying to gauge how long it will take - as I have certain users that become very unhappy when they see a massage arrive more than an hour after it was originally sent. There's a reason email is called email and not instant messaging. __