Has there been a change in user-ppp or general networking behaviour
between 4.* and 5-STABLE which might explain why I can't talk to a
private network's PPP server from a 5.4 machine when I can from a 4.11
machine using the same ppp.conf etc?
I can connect and all looks fine WRT routing and ifcon
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mrspock (m) writes:
m> The problem is that I don't want to use the temporary
m> file that I used above (stdout, stderr, out), I just
m> want a "filter"
If you want to rearange the output so that all the errors are after
all the non errors, then you are going to ne
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Colin J Raven (cjr) writes:
cjr> Does anyone happen to know how you would *attach* *not readin the
cjr> contents of, but actually *attach*) a file using /usr/bin/mail?
The metamail package includes metasend, a script which will build a
MIME message you can then sen
> > It builds them all, but instals teh first one on this machine.
>
>
> Would it build all the modules three time, I wonder?
Seems to, but who cares? CPU cycles are cheap. I build on the machine
which serves as the mail/news/dns/etc server, which is basicly idle
all the time (those services ju
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fabian Keil (fk) writes:
fk> If the kernels are the same, you can use the same build
fk> on every machine as well.
If they aren't it works to set KERNCONF to the whole list on the build
machine
KENRCONF="Macine1 Macine2 Machine3"
It builds them all, but
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kai Grossjohann (kg) writes:
kg> Software is written for users, isn't it?
>From observation I would say that most software is written against
users.
As for FBSD, I hope it is being written for the enjoyment of those
writing it, since that is the best insurance th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gerard Samuel (gs) writes:
gs> Im running tar(1) to make a tar ball of a directory using the
gs> --newer-mtime to only get newer files after a specified date.
gs> Unfortunately, it also creates unwanted "empty" directories.
Have you tried using find?
If a relati
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mail25 (m) writes:
m> There's so much bad-mouthing sendmail!
All I can say to that is:
R<@> $+ + $* < @ $* . >
$: < $(virtuser $1 @ $3 $@ $1 $@ $2 $@ +$2 $: @ $) > $1 + $2 < @ $3 . >
--
Mail me as [EMAIL PROTECTED]_O_
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cordula's Web (cw) writes:
cw> Tux looks cute, but does it stand for (code) bloat? ;-)
It's quite simple:
BSD: Daemon, evil, 'nuff said.
Linux: Penguin, it's never going to fly.
Windows: Distorted windowframe, lets crooks in.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Grauwmans Steven (gs) writes:
gs> If U could please help me, I'm getting confused.
Linux is a kernel, ie the bit of the OS which needs to be there, but
you should never be aware of in normal use if it works properly.
Unix is a trademark. There used to be an OS ca
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Charles Swiger (cs) writes:
cs> You are correct that one needs to measure the voltage and use the RMS
cs> value, or DC series equivalent if you like that phrase, in order to
cs> figure out the power consumption accurately, but an {ammeter,
cs> amp-meter, DMM} which
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonathon McKitrick (jm) writes:
jm> I have my desktop configured to run as a server and app server for a thin
jm> client laptop. Will running it all day without suspend mode use a lot of
jm> power?
Turn the monitor off, especially if it is getting old. I have a 19
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph Gleason (jg) writes:
jg> I'm going to check into postfix and maybe qmail.
Haven't played with qmail, but we were handed postfix on some managed
linux servers. Years of experience with sendmail made me dread
learning another monsterous system.
Actually I jus
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Brownsea (pb) writes:
pb> ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting
pb> ata0: resetting devices ..
pb> And then it just hangs.
This one is getting popular.
There is at least one disk controller chipset out there which FBSD 4.X
doesn't understand. I
> Did you tried with another HDD ? Does the HDD work on another mobo ?
Don't really want to mess with the hardware too much. These are
supposed to be identical machines to deliver quickly to a customer as
a stop-gap. I'll try with a spare HD this evening, but basicly I just
want to get something g
> > The motherboard is an ASRock KS41
> > Chipset:SIS 741 + SIS 963L
> > Athalon 2400+
> HDD model and firmware version would be useful.
The HDD is a maxtor 6Y080P0 The BIOS is AMI and identifies itself as
K7S41 P1.10.
As a matter of interest, I have had a very si
I can't install 4.X on a couple of identical new machines. They both
exhibit the same problem, and it's consistant, so it's probably not
bad hardware, though perhaps weird hardware. Also, 5.2 does install,
but these are to be production machines at a remote location so I'd
really rather be running
17 matches
Mail list logo