Re: glibc vs BSD libc

2003-01-24 Thread Pavel Cahyna
Hello, > the compat packages exist to provide missing libraries. the netbsd > libc "soname" has never changed -- it was libc.so.12 when the first > ELF port arrived, and it is libc.so.12 today. of course you can not So the ABI for libc didn't change since the introduction of ELF and no compat l

Re: glibc vs BSD libc

2003-01-24 Thread Pavel Cahyna
> > when making such assertions it helps to be actually correct. while it > is true that *any* old binary may require COMPAT_XX options in the kernel, > netbsd supports binaries back to 386bsd for i386, with shorter periods > of backwards compat for the newer plaforms. i have personally run 386b

Re: glibc vs BSD libc

2003-01-23 Thread Pavel Cahyna
Hello, some notes about NetBSD libc: it supports nsswitch for a long time, see here: http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?nsswitch.conf++NetBSD-current Dynamically loaded NSS modules are not supported. To David Brownlee: I doubt NetBSD 1.0 binary could run against a NetBSD 1.6 libc. They don't