; Windows XP is the best that you can do for the
> desktop
Well, that's your opinion. For me, FreeBSD is a much better desktop than
Windows -- it runs solid and fast and enables me to be more productive
in my work. Of course, what is good for me might not be so good for
someone else, I gues
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 11:35 +, Miguel Saturnino wrote:
> My server reboots sporadically (once a day, maximum) and I hope someone
> can shed some light on why this is happening.
>
> I've upgraded to 6.0-RELEASE yesterday but the symptoms remain...
> Attached is the backtra
Hi!
My server reboots sporadically (once a day, maximum) and I hope someone
can shed some light on why this is happening.
I've upgraded to 6.0-RELEASE yesterday but the symptoms remain...
Attached is the backtrace of the crash dump and the relevant portion
of /var/log/messages.
My custom kernel
Hi Cris!
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 11:38 -0600, Chris wrote:
> > I have a FreeBSD 5.3 release system which was upgraded with CVSup to
> > RELENG_5. I have recently built a new kernel, but *have not* rebuilt
> > "world". The computer now says it's a "FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE" system.
> >
> > This can't be r
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 18:51 +0100, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> > I think I have two options:
> > * downgrade the sources to RELENG_5_3 with CVSup (replacing
> > RELENG_5 with RELENG_5_3 in the supfile) and build a new
> FreeBSD
> > 5.3 kernel
> > or
> > * rebuild
Hi!
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 release system which was upgraded with CVSup to
RELENG_5. I have recently built a new kernel, but *have not* rebuilt
"world". The computer now says it's a "FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE" system.
This can't be right, can it? :/
I think I have two options:
* downgrade the sour
