says which options it requested before it
blew up.
Martin
--
%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
Shameless advocate of FreeBSD. http://www.freebsd.org/
___
f
et of snapshots.
Am I out of luck after having started to snapshot at top level?
Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
_
Michel Talon wrote on Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:34:33AM +0200:
> Martin Cracauer wrote:
>
> > Right now I think there's a general lack of people building CMUCL
> > binaries, BTW.
>
> There are "recent" cmucl binaries built here:
> http://common-lisp.net
; libc.so.6 => not found (0x0)
> >
> > % pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lisp
> > /usr/local/bin/lisp was installed by package cmucl-19f_1
> >
> > I've reinstalled the port, but still the same problem.
> >
> > misc/compat4x (compat4x-i38
Pietro Cerutti wrote on Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:52:27PM +0200:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Martin Cracauer wrote:
> | I'll have to repartition my 6.3 notebook anyway. Can you remind me
> | which filesystems I can have background fsc
ecked?
Thanks
Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebs
d but I must be missing something.
I badly need background fsck. We are talking a 1.3 GHz, a 5400 rpm
P-ATA notebook harddrive with a 150 GB filesystem here :-/
Martin
--
%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://
e:
# session running, press detach key
[detached]
-en \033]0; grisu:ttype:~\007
Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today.
options
in the BIOSes are often broken.
Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
s to
run very specific code fast and gcc can't do much about it.
Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
_
and non-SMP kernel). In combination with other load it
becomes unpredictable. Any benchmark doing dd of=/dev/null is bogus
IMHO.
My cstream utility has a build-in disgard option which avoids this
problem.
Martin
--
%%%%%%%
Martin Cr
ications). Socket 939 systems can have faster
RAM (a little less useless) but are limited to 4 GB and there is some
BWCing to get ECC. CPUs are limited to 2.6 GHz with the FX-60.
Socket 940 single-core CPUs can be had up to 2.8 GHz.
Martin
--
%%%%
nment",
along with his "Unix Network Programming" are still classics and from
what I have seen best by far.
Martin
--
%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to g
Gary Kline wrote on Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 08:31:43PM -0800:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:20:40PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> > For hardware testing, the best is ports/math/mprime
> >
> > In combination with memtest86, because mprime doesn't sweep all RAM.
&g
artin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
has problems, but mostly on high CPU counts.
So it probably doesn't matter either way.
Martin
--
%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today
out first moving
the data somewhere.
Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
Here's PCIe speed:
x1 5 Gbps 4 Gbps (500 MB/sec)
x4 20 Gbps 16 Gbps (2 GB/sec)
x8 40 Gbps 32 Gbps (4 GB/sec)
x16 80 Gbps 64 Gbps (8 GB/sec)
Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, t
he
pid of a foreground process without reverting to `ps` which is not
sportish.
It's better to use a dedicated timeoput mechanism, e.g.:
http://cracauer-forum.cons.org/forum/cratimeout.html
Then you can do `cratimeout 6 lynx`
Martin
--
%
--
%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
but there was a reporting problem in
atacontrol.
You should easily be able to tell whether it is on or off by the write
performance. It should plummet by a factor of 4 or so.
cstream -i- -o/mnt/wherever/tmpfile -v1
Martin
--
%%%%%%%
21 matches
Mail list logo