Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 + FreeBSD + TCP/IP (Solved)

2005-06-14 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
> On Jun 14, 2005, at 4:46 PM, Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: >> >> I'm guessing that opening the port is part of what placing >> "postgresql_enable=YES" in the rc.conf file does, correct? If so, >> that's >> probably the problem as I have no

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 + FreeBSD + TCP/IP

2005-06-14 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
> On Tuesday 14 June 2005 03:14 pm, Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:05:05AM -0500, Joseph Koenig (jWeb) > wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm having a difficulty getting PostgreSQL to accept TCP/IP >>>&g

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 + FreeBSD + TCP/IP

2005-06-14 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:05:05AM -0500, Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm having a difficulty getting PostgreSQL to accept TCP/IP connections on >> FreeBSD 5.3. I have edited 'postgresql.conf' in my postgres data directory >> to set

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 + FreeBSD + TCP/IP

2005-06-14 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
>> Hi, >> >> I'm having a difficulty getting PostgreSQL to accept TCP/IP connections on >> FreeBSD 5.3. I have edited 'postgresql.conf' in my postgres data directory >> to set the listen_address (and uncommented it) and have the port line >> uncommented and set to the default 5432. I then restarte

PostgreSQL 8.0.3 + FreeBSD + TCP/IP

2005-06-14 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
Hi, I'm having a difficulty getting PostgreSQL to accept TCP/IP connections on FreeBSD 5.3. I have edited 'postgresql.conf' in my postgres data directory to set the listen_address (and uncommented it) and have the port line uncommented and set to the default 5432. I then restarted the postmaster a

FreeBSD + Apache2 + PHP + MySQL ?

2005-02-01 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
Hi, I'm getting ready to begin moving sites from an old web server to a new one. I've been reading about Apache 2 and it looks like it offers some great new features, but I'm concerned about the stability of it. I've seen a number of issues with memory leaks, etc, which concerns me because this se

Remote upgrade possible?

2005-01-06 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
I have a freebsd 4.9 system that I'd like to get upgraded to 4.10 and then soon to 4.11. However, the server is not physically in front of me, nor do I have physical access to it. Is it possible still to upgrade it, or do I need to physically get in front of the machine somehow? Thanks, Joe Koenig

Re: Hardware or OS problem? System Crashing...

2005-01-06 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
>> On 1/5/2005 at 09:14 Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The system >> is >>> FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the kicker) >>

Re: Hardware or OS problem?

2005-01-06 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
> On 1/5/2005 at 09:14 Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The system > is >> FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the kicker) > 73GB >> RAID 1 AT

Hardware or OS problem?

2005-01-05 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
Hi, We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The system is FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the kicker) 73GB RAID 1 ATA drives. The system serves as a web/database server dedicated to 1 site. Daily the system goes out and downloads real estate listings (v

SMP on 4.10

2004-08-20 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
So, what's the word with SMP on FreeBSD 4.10 these days? Is it stable (for production)? I have a DB server that will be running only MySQL and PostgreSQL. The box is a dual PIII 1.2 GHz and I'd love to make use of SMP if it's stable. Thanks, Joe Koenig Production Manager jWeb New Media Design [EMA

Anyone using FreeBSD 4.10 + Apache 2 + PHP 5 ?

2004-08-20 Thread Joseph Koenig (jWeb)
Is anyone using FreeBSD 4.10 + Apache 2 + PHP 5 + MySQL/PostgreSQL? I'm building a new web server and will be migrating a number of site from a machine with FreeBSD 4.2 + Apache 1.3 + PHP 4 + MySQL/PostgreSQL and was wondering if Apache 2 was stable enough at this point or if I should stick with th