any experiences noteworthy with Gigabyte GA-965P-S3 motherboard components?

2007-06-02 Thread John Reynolds
Hello all, I searched the archives for GA-965P-S3 and other permutations looking for information about the components that come on this Gigabyte motherboard. I didn't find much except stuff related to -current. Can people relate any experiences using this motherboard under -stable or -current? It

Re: nspluginwrapper + native firefox 2 + flash9?

2007-04-12 Thread John Reynolds
[ On Friday, April 13, Ghirai wrote: ] > Hello John, > > I'm using konqueror with flash, and i followed this howto > (http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/konqueror-flash.php). > > I know you were looking for a way to get FF to work, > but i gave up, and konqueror is working fine for me. > Well, I've

nspluginwrapper + native firefox 2 + flash9?

2007-04-12 Thread John Reynolds
Hi everybody, I've been struggling with this all night and the archives + google aren't coming up with much except for other people's success stories. I recently ditched using the linux-firefox port in favor of the native version when I read a post about nspluginwrapper. I've spent the last 2 days

losing the -z option to moused worked?

2006-03-07 Thread John Reynolds
Hello all, I recently upgraded my system from an ancient 5.1-CURRENT to 6.1-BETA2 and all was going fine until my trusty Logitech plain-jane 3-button mouse with scroll wheel wouldn't scroll with the wheel :) I grepped the list archives and googled quite a bit and it appears that in Xorg 6.9.0 they

Canterwood/Springdale platform support questions

2003-06-05 Thread John Reynolds
Hey all, after some googling, grepping, etc. I'm still at a loss to determine if the forthcoming 5.1-RELEASE (or 5.x-RELEASE for that matter) will have support for the recently released Canterwood/Springdale platforms--notably the S-ATA functionality of ICH5? I looked at the CVS repo and saw some

Re: is our printf(1) behavior correct w.r.t \0 escapes?

2003-01-28 Thread John Reynolds~
the -current sources tonight, compile under a fresh -STABLE and if things work and don't appear broken in any manner I will file a PR. Thanks for your help. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |John Reynolds Sr. Component Design Engineer

Re: is our printf(1) behavior correct w.r.t \0 escapes?

2003-01-28 Thread John Reynolds~
hile the latest on the RELENG_4 branch is still what I have--1.12.6.6. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |John Reynolds Sr. Component Design Engineer - ICG/EID/Si Engineering | |Intel Corporation MS: CH6-302 Phone: 480-554-9092

Re: is our printf(1) behavior correct w.r.t \0 escapes?

2003-01-28 Thread John Reynolds~
was Dec 26th of 2002 (4.7-STABLE). Maybe if it's not a libc problem but just a printf(1) src problem we could get an MFC done ... Thanks for the info. At least we know that -current acts like other OS's. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

is our printf(1) behavior correct w.r.t \0 escapes?

2003-01-28 Thread John Reynolds~
4 005 freebsd [~]<78>% printf "foo\0%d" 4 | od -c printf: missing format character 000f o o 003 This behavior has been checked on HP-UX and Solaris and those two systems are identical to the Linux one. It seems to me that our printf(1)'s beh