I am really sorry i offend you! It was not my wish!
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
wrote:
> >>>>> "Friedrich" == Friedrich Locke writes:
>
> Friedrich> The http server is just an excuse, ok? Happy now?
>
> So why lie to us, then
Jesus Christ!
The http server is just an excuse, ok? Happy now?
I just need to know, for a tcp server which of those apporaches could
deliver best results!
That's really the question was all about !
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
wrote:
> >>>>> &
server) of small files,
> surely it can handle the load you're planning on throwing at it ?
>
>
>
> On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Friedrich Locke
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Mark for suggestion, but my doubt still remains.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
>
Thank you Mark for suggestion, but my doubt still remains.
Regards.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Mark Blackman wrote:
> On 13 Nov 2012, at 10:23, Friedrich Locke
> wrote:
>
> > Hi list members,
> >
> > i would like to be an http server for static content
Go for algr, i can't do wrong.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav
wrote:
> I have some boxes (about 40) that I was tasked with creating a
> centralized logging infrastructure for. I see in ports that we have
> several different versions of rsyslog, and syslog-ng.
>
> Is there any
Dear gentleman,
i would like to configure a FreeBSD installation as storage server
solution. Iwould like to use iSCSI.
Is it possible to configure a server running FreeBSD as a iSCSI server
(i.e., i mean as a target)?
Thanks a lot for your time and cooperation.
Best regards,
FL.
___
