On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>
> On Apr 26, 2011, at 8:32 AM, Nathan Vidican wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Ryan Coleman
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've got an OpenVPN connection working to my remote server, but I want
> to route the traffic to the local LAN.
> >>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Diego Arias wrote:
> Its actually a little bit harder than that, not impossible but you have to
> upgrade the base OS and then the ports (Packages). As we have now 8.2 i
> suggest to do a clean-installation
>
> From version 6 and newer you co
Hi:
FreeBSD 4.11 is juts too old you should Upgrade that machine.
Anyway check the named(bind) version to see if it supports srv records.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Ola Peters wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Thanks so much for placing this contact information in your header! I am
> trying to add
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 02:21 +0100, "n j" wrote:
>
> > If you know of any other FreeBSD VPS providers, please share.
>
> At the moment I am running a XEN/HVM VPS from:
>
> http://www.syscentral.de
>
> -Herbert
>
>
>
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Mark Moellering wrote:
> Hello All,
> My company needs a [new] e-mail solution for a product rollout. Rather
> than
> have a few e-mail domains with lots of addresses, the solution we need is
> for
> a very few (mostly one, very rarely more than 3) accounts on up
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "John D McDonnell" :
>
> > Sorry if this is a repost, had an error when sending the original e-mail
> > and after waiting a bit, I haven't seen the message show up on
> > Questions, so I'm guessing it didn't go through.
> >
> > In
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Leonardo Santagostini <
lsantagost...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have one freebsd 8.1 box with 3 3G mobile broadband connection.
>
> All connections works fine, but i want to do loadbalancing / fault tolerant
> with this 3 connections.
>
> I was reading ab
Hi:
Using gmirror you wont loose any data, just be carefully editing fstab to
point the right devices (triple check). Its actually quite easy.
Anyway if you can get console access its better just for precaution.
Diego Arias
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Jerrin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
2010/8/25 Mikhail Zatsepin
> I could not find out from the site and the release which proxy server is
> used in FreeBSD as a standard one.
> Where we can look for it?
>
> ---
> MZ
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd
ebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
Hi:
I use Virtualbox for my desktop and have 1 VM running on Vsphere 4
(FreeBSD 8). Only have problem once of data loss because i used ATA disk
instead of SCSI.
Diego Arias
--
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Andrew Gould wrote:
> I purchased an HP Pavilion p6510f. I cannot boot either FreeBSD 8.1
> (amd64) or OpenSUSE 11.3 Gnome Live CD unless I change the hard drive
> mode from RAID to IDE. Unfortunately, that damages my Windows 7
> installation. (The computer is c
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:30 PM, John Almberg wrote:
>
> If you have hardware controller with RAID capabilities, using native RAID
>> is better, otherwise look towards gvinum or maybe ccd; see also:
>>
>>
> I've just been reading up on RAID in my Absolute FreeBSD book, and it
> occurs to me that
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Lowell Gilbert <
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
> zaxis writes:
>
> > Now i use the following commands to maintain my freebsd box.
> >
> >>portsnap fetch update
> >>pkg_version -vIL=
> >>portupgrade -R xxx
> >
> > It works great for software insta
Thanks, i will provide anything info you need.
Diego Arias
--
mmm, interesante.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-uns
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rob wrote:
> I've seen the SYBA SY-PEX40008, but would prefer to have a PCI-e 4x
> connector for the bandwidth and avoid a port multiplier if possible. Since
> this will be in a ZFS pool, I'd prefer not to have 1 bad port take out more
> than 1 disk. :) I have se
15 matches
Mail list logo