[Please include me in responses; I've set Reply-To as a hint. Thanks!]
A colleague had been running a program that makes use of IPCS message
queues in a 7.x/i386 environment.
He was moved to a 32-bit 7.x-based jail instantiated on an 8.x/amd64
host.
Within that jail, "ipcs -a" now fails to come
[I'm not subscribed to -questions, so please include me in responses.
I've provided a valid Reply-To as a hint to your MUA.]
For the last 14 years or so, my NIS server on the home network has
been a SPARCstation 5/170 running Solaris 2.6; I'm finally getting
around to decommissioning it.
Accordin
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:36:34PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> ...
> > Why not simply use bsdlabel -e da0s1?
>
> Because I didnt know about that? ;-)
>
> Thank you for the hint.
>
> However I still have the same doubt. Since basically its the same
> task, Is it safe do relabel this way?
I hav
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:24:41PM +0530, chandra reddy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the following error when i run tar on a directory.
>
> [chan...@home]$ tar zcf config-xsl.tar config-xsl/9.6
>
> tar: Cannot open directory
> config-xsl/9.6/configuration/protocols/mpls/label-switched-path/oa
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 06:29:03AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> ...
> You are right that feeding data to a looping construct through a pipe
> may run in a subshell. The ``Single UNIX Specification'' says
>
Ah; thanks for the confirmation.
>...
> What I usually do in similar shell scri
I am writing a (Bourne) shell script that is intended (among other
things) to obtain information from a command, such as:
netstat -nibd -f inet
by reading and parsing the output.
However, the "obvious" (to me) approach of piping the output of the
command to the standard input of a "while
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:29:13PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> ...
> [ ...redirected to freebsd-questions... ]
Thanks for doing that!
> ...
> You don't have a check-state rule anywhere, so you either need to add
> one or a rule to pass established traffic to and from port 22.
I thought che
Seems that I can't refer - explicitly -- to partition "a" of a
partitioned "vnode disk" if it's assigned /dev/vn0. If I assign it
/dev/vn1, no problem. If I change the name of the partition to "b", no
problem. I can even just refer to it as /dev/vn0, and /dev/vn0a gets
selected.
So I'm a tad pu