Intel 810 and agpgart

2005-10-07 Thread David Syphers
I'm trying to install X.org on a new machine, and failing. I'm running 6-BETA5. When I try to run X (say with 'X -config /root/xorg.conf.new') it fails with (WW) I810: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:2:1) found (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or dire

Re: problems mounting a DVD

2005-08-20 Thread David Syphers
On Saturday 20 August 2005 06:32 pm, Garrett Cooper wrote: > David Syphers wrote: > >On Friday 19 August 2005 08:57 pm, Roshan wrote: > >>On 8/19/05, David Syphers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>I'm trying to mount a DVD+RW disc on my DVD-ROM driv

Re: problems mounting a DVD

2005-08-19 Thread David Syphers
On Friday 19 August 2005 08:57 pm, Roshan wrote: > On 8/19/05, David Syphers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm trying to mount a DVD+RW disc on my DVD-ROM drive, and not > > succeeding. Trying either 'mount_cd9660 /dev/acd1 /cdrom1' or 'mount -t > &

problems mounting a DVD

2005-08-19 Thread David Syphers
I'm trying to mount a DVD+RW disc on my DVD-ROM drive, and not succeeding. Trying either 'mount_cd9660 /dev/acd1 /cdrom1' or 'mount -t udf /dev/acd1 /cdrom1' results in an 'Input/output error'. I've never tried mounting DVDs on this drive before, but I play DVD movies on it all the time, so I a

Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions

2004-12-02 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:33:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote: > > On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote: > > > On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > W

Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions

2004-12-02 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote: > On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > What command-line are you using? > > Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving the -u option > to portupgrade, and I can understand wh

Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions

2004-12-02 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > What command-line are you using? Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving the -u option to portupgrade, and I can understand why it can't do that without building the port. Doing it without -u works fine. -David

portupgrade, packages, and same versions

2004-12-02 Thread David Syphers
I just upgraded to 5-STABLE from an older version of 5, and wanted to rebuild all my ports because of the ABI compatability breakage just before 5-RELEASE. I ran across behavior in portupgrade that I don't understand - if I force an upgrade because I already have the same version installed, port

Re: basic sendmail problem

2004-11-18 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 18 November 2004 05:58 pm, Gene wrote: > Check /etc/mail for >relay-domains > and >local-host-names > > I had to put my "host.domain.net" in each of these as well as access in > order > to get sendmail 8.13.1 to work. Thanks, everything works now. So it was either this,

Re: basic sendmail problem

2004-11-17 Thread David Syphers
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 10:26 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Yes, I got that. What I didn't understand was why is fixing the DNS > setup not a priority here? Well, that's not what you asked. It wasn't a priority because I didn't know this was a problem, and my "server" is a computer that

Re: basic sendmail problem

2004-11-17 Thread David Syphers
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 08:59 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2004-11-17 20:35, David Syphers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have sendmail_enable="YES" in rc.conf, I have my aliases and > > virtusertable files the way I want them, sendmail's r

basic sendmail problem

2004-11-17 Thread David Syphers
I've previously used sendmail in a very simple configuration - it just forwards my mail to another address. I now want to do that again, and find that it no longer works. I'm using Sendmail 8.13.1 on 6-CURRENT from 20040905 (i.e. pretty much FreeBSD 5, but with one crucial fix so it would boot o

Re: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 09 September 2004 01:57 pm, eric wrote: > On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 13:22:15 -0700, David Syphers proclaimed... > > > I disagree. I think a completely new user should start with 5.x - there's > > no reason to learn the details of how 4.x works, just to have significa

Re: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 09 September 2004 08:13 am, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > At this point, unless you have some critical application that needs the > > proven stability of 4.x, I don't see a good reason for a new user to > > start there. Given that you want it for learning, I would say the > > choice is be

Re: sysinstall problem

2004-09-08 Thread David Syphers
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:57 pm, Gene Bomgardner wrote: > I'm not sure how to use pkg_add directly to install the entire XFree86 > distribution. I suspect it's not a single package. Is there a list > somewhere? XFree86 is in ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.2.1-release/x1

Re: sysinstall problem

2004-09-08 Thread David Syphers
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:05 pm, Gene Bomgardner wrote: > Running 5.2.1. The package is found and downloaded before the error > occurrs. In this particular case, it's fonts for XFree86, but the same > occurrs for each package it tries to add. I wonder if I might be running up > against perm

Re: sysinstall problem

2004-09-08 Thread David Syphers
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 08:44 am, Gene Bomgardner wrote: > I've been trying to get the XFree86 distribution installed on my 5.2 box > using sysinstall over FTP from several sites. Each time I get the message Do you already have 5.2 installed and are going back into sysinstall, or are you i

Re: 5.3 & ipfilter

2004-09-07 Thread David Syphers
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 07:30 pm, JJB wrote: > Thanks for your reply. But you did not answer my first question. I > did not ask if ipfilter_enable="YES" was still valid in 5.3, but if > the ipfilter bootable module is still included in 5.3 and auto > loaded by the ipfilter_enable="YES" in rc.c

Re: port problem in AMD 64

2004-09-07 Thread David Syphers
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 07:18 pm, ann kok wrote: > Hi all > > I can't install cvsup-without-gui and said it > doesn't support amd64 > > How can I upgrade the /usr/ports without cvsup? First of all, you posted this question earlier today. Do not send multiple copies of the same message to the

Re: 5.3 & ipfilter

2004-09-07 Thread David Syphers
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 05:03 pm, fbsd_user wrote: > Is there still a loadable module that gets auto loaded at boot time > when rc.conf contains the ipfilter_enable="YES" statement like in > 4.10? ipfilter_enable is still an option in rc.conf. > Will the final stable version still need kerne

Re: Error when installing apr-svn from ports collection

2004-09-07 Thread David Syphers
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 01:32 pm, Carsten Gehling wrote: > I am trying to install "subversion" from the ports collection. I have > updated my ports tree. When I do "make install" in > /usr/ports/devel/subversion, the make fails on one of the dependencies > (apr-svn): > > checking for unistd.h.

Re: IP Filter on FreeBSD 5.2.1

2004-09-07 Thread David Syphers
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 02:12 pm, Wayne Pascoe wrote: > On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:07:34PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > > I think you missed this option: > > > > options PFIL_HOOKS # pfil(9) framework > > > > in your kernel config file.. > > > > Try it and see it's magic ;

Re: KDE make package failure

2004-09-07 Thread David Syphers
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 05:42 am, Peter Ryan wrote: > I did not install KDE from packages. > As soon as I installed the bare system I > cvsup'd all the ports, then did a > make install kde3. > > This completed successfully, albeit in > 3 days. > > I then tried to "make package" for kde > so I

Re: AMD 64 and 4.10. will they work?

2004-09-06 Thread David Syphers
On Monday 06 September 2004 08:27 pm, Ara Avvali wrote: > I have checked on site and what I can see that 5 is the one which actually > supports athlon 64 processors. But what I am wondering if there is anyway > to run it under 4.10 since we are looking for stable series. 5 is almost -STABLE (it is

Re: Update Kde 3.x to 3.y

2004-09-06 Thread David Syphers
On Monday 06 September 2004 06:36 pm, Leandro Malaquias wrote: > I'm new to the list and I'm sure that this question has been asked before, > but I am using kde 3.1 and I've read heaps of stuff on the internet but > none really helped. How can I update my kde 3.1 to kde 3.2.3 using cvsup? You prob

Re: getting ssh to work

2004-09-03 Thread David Syphers
On Friday 03 September 2004 02:56 am, David Syphers wrote: [a lot of stuff about how ssh doesn't work] Oh my, I feel silly. See, I have no experience with LANs, and foolishly though that I had a real IP, that computers off the LAN could use to find me... Didn't even realize I was

Re: getting ssh to work

2004-09-03 Thread David Syphers
On Friday 03 September 2004 01:43 am, Matthew Seaman wrote: > One thing to check -- do you have the machine key for the remote > machine cached somewhere No. > Failing that, try running ssh and/or sshd in debug mode. On the > client side you can run: > > % ssh -v -v -v [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread David Syphers
On Friday 03 September 2004 01:45 am, Andy Holyer wrote: > The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit), and I > mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more. "Oh", > he said, "and then you've got to reboot it?". I explained that > generally some upgrade comes al

getting ssh to work

2004-09-03 Thread David Syphers
I recently tried to ssh into my desktop from another machine, and found that it doesn't work (it times out). I'm not sure what I need to do to make it work. I'm running 5-CURRENT from August 3 (back when 5 was still -CURRENT). I've confirmed that sshd is running (sshd_enable="YES" is in rc.conf)

Re: help with 'hello world'

2004-08-25 Thread David Syphers
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 07:46 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:40:07PM -0700, David Syphers wrote: > > This compiles fine on SunOS using egcs-2.91.66. However, it fails on > > FreeBSD (gcc 3.4.2) and RedHat (gcc 3.2.3) with the bizarre error "`

help with 'hello world'

2004-08-25 Thread David Syphers
It's been a while since I wrote anything in C++, but this is sad - I can't get hello world to compile. Could some kind person please tell me what, exactly, is wrong with: #include int main() { cout << "Hello World"; return 0; } This compiles fine on SunOS using egcs-2.91.66. However, it fails

Olympus D-400 camera on FreeBSD

2004-03-22 Thread David Syphers
Hi, I sent a couple messages to the gphoto list a few weeks ago, but they never showed up on the archives. So I'm trying again. I'm not sure if my problem is with gphoto or FreeBSD, though I'm leaning towards gphoto... I was just given an old Olympus D-400 Zoom camera (which I think gphoto2 s

olympus D-400 camera on FreeBSD

2004-02-26 Thread David Syphers
Hi, Sorry for the cross post, but I'm not sure whether my problem is with gphoto2 or FreeBSD. Please cc: me in reply. I was just given an old Olympus D-400 Zoom camera (which gphoto2 claims to support), and I'm trying to download pictures onto a computer running FreeBSD -CURRENT (from Feb. 26)

Re: Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE & named pipes

2003-03-10 Thread David Syphers
On Monday 10 March 2003 09:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote: > I worked on 4.7 & still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) ) > > This is NetBSD 1.6 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo "test" > f & > [1] 2383 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat < f > test > [1]+ Doneecho "test" >f > > > And

Re: disabling sendmail in 5.0

2003-02-07 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 06 February 2003 09:11 pm, Kevin Stevens wrote: > On Thursday, Feb 6, 2003, at 19:05 US/Pacific, David Syphers wrote: > >>> sendmail_enable="NO" > >> > >> make this NONE > > > > Unfortunately, this is only valid in 4-stable. It

Re: disabling sendmail in 5.0

2003-02-06 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 06 February 2003 07:25 pm, Larry Rosenman wrote: > --On Thursday, February 06, 2003 19:24:07 -0600 David Syphers > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm running 5.0-R, and can't seem to disable sendmail. I have > > > > sendmail_enable="NO&

disabling sendmail in 5.0

2003-02-06 Thread David Syphers
I'm running 5.0-R, and can't seem to disable sendmail. I have sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" in my rc.conf, but when I boot, I get the error Feb 6 19:16:31 Yggdrasil sm-msp-queue[415]: My unqualified host name (Yggdrasil) unknown; sleeping for r